You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
International-UN-NGOs
U.N. panel to frame guidelines on legality of pre-emptive strike
2004-10-07
EFL - Global test?
Members of an international panel studying United Nations' operations say the group hopes to lay down clear rules declaring when it is legal for a nation to use pre-emptive military force in its own defense. The issue grows out of the international controversy over the Bush administration's decision to invade Iraq without a final U.N. Security Council resolution explicitly authorizing the war, said panel member Gareth Evans, a former foreign minister of Australia. "I expect the panel to be giving close consideration to what those rules are and how they should be applied and whether an effort should be made to identify generally agreed criteria for the legitimate use of force, whatever the context," Mr. Evans said during a recent appearance at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington.

He made his remarks before last week's presidential debate in which Democratic nominee Sen. John Kerry's call for a "global test" on when pre-emptive action is justified became a campaign issue. U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan established the 16-member High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change in November to study ways to reform the 59-year-old organization so it can better address 21st-century threats to security and peace. But Mr. Evans, currently president of the International Crisis Group think tank, said much of the panel's work has focused on establishing detailed guidelines for the use of military force. "A central reason for our appointment was concern that the U.N., and indeed the whole multilateral security system, was really at a crossroads with the resurgence of unilateralism from you know whom, and increasing willingness to bypass the Security Council," Mr. Evans said in a clear reference to the Bush administration.
Posted by:Super Hose

#39  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anonymous6176   2004-10-07 5:32:51 PM  

#38  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Poison Reverse   2004-10-07 4:50:08 PM  

#37  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: John (Q. Citizen)   2004-10-07 4:17:00 PM  

#36  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: jules 187   2004-10-07 3:50:21 PM  

#35  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: John (Q. Citizen)   2004-10-07 3:48:04 PM  

#34  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: jules 187   2004-10-07 2:59:05 PM  

#33  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: John (Q. Citizen)   2004-10-07 1:06:28 PM  

#32  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: rkb   2004-10-07 12:56:22 PM  

#31  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: John (Q. Citizen)   2004-10-07 12:18:00 PM  

#30  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-10-07 11:40:33 AM  

#29  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-10-07 11:32:17 AM  

#28  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: mojo   2004-10-07 11:16:52 AM  

#27  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2004-10-07 10:59:19 AM  

#26  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Steve from Relto   2004-10-07 10:55:16 AM  

#25  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Pappy   2004-10-07 10:55:10 AM  

#24  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Dave D.   2004-10-07 10:54:42 AM  

#23  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: jules 187   2004-10-07 10:49:38 AM  

#22  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-10-07 10:44:55 AM  

#21  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: RWV   2004-10-07 10:39:59 AM  

#20  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-10-07 10:35:08 AM  

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-10-07 10:31:44 AM  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: badanov   2004-10-07 10:30:10 AM  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Poison Reverse   2004-10-07 10:29:47 AM  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-10-07 10:28:59 AM  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-10-07 10:26:42 AM  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-10-07 10:26:41 AM  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-10-07 10:24:26 AM  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: jules 187   2004-10-07 10:17:38 AM  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: jules 187   2004-10-07 10:16:32 AM  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: PlanetDan   2004-10-07 10:16:30 AM  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-10-07 10:09:16 AM  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2004-10-07 10:07:23 AM  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2004-10-07 9:59:13 AM  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Dave D.   2004-10-07 9:48:48 AM  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ed   2004-10-07 9:33:49 AM  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: RN   2004-10-07 9:32:02 AM  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: CrazyFool   2004-10-07 9:27:24 AM  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: RN   2004-10-07 9:24:24 AM  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: John (Q. Citizen)   2004-10-07 9:19:35 AM  

00:00