You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Who Will Answer Bill Maher's Good Question?
2004-08-30
via Townhall (h/t Lucianne) - EFL
Jay Bryant - August 30, 2004
Friday night, Bill Maher had John O'Neill on his HBO television program. O'Neill, of course, is the principal author of Unfit for Command, the book version of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth campaign to challenge John Kerry's military record. The interview itself was almost unbearably anger-provoking, as Maher snidely attempted to skewer O'Neill over and over again, while a studio audience laughed and applauded the host's every word. At least, unlike Chris "Motormouth" Matthews, he didn't interrupt O'Neill's every sentence.

In the face of this hostility, O'Neill was calm and respectful, not giving an inch, but always unflappably reasoned. I can only suppose he manages to stifle the urge to trade invective with a wiseacre like Maher by basking in the secure knowledge that he and his compatriots among the Swift Boat Veterans are an astonishing political success, the surest measure of which is the hateful reaction they have provoked among the Kerry-worshipping news media.

In the process of the interview, Maher asked at least (and perhaps only) one interesting question: if all that O'Neill says is true, why is it that other Swift Boat veterans are backing Kerry? O'Neill didn't rise to the bait, and contented himself with pointing out that Kerry has in fact the support of fewer than twenty Swift Boat veterans, whereas well over 200 had signed up with the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth. But it is a good question, nonetheless, much better than Maher imagines, because it leads - or at least should lead - to some follow-up questions that, so far as I know, no news organization has undertaken.
...more...

Thoughtful, factual, article which goes where no others have gone before... and further both challenges and illuminates the craven duplicity and connivance of the media. MSM is committing suicide - and the blogosphere will carry the obit.
Posted by:.com

#25  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: AF Lady   2004-08-30 6:13:50 PM  

#24  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: CrazyFool   2004-08-30 5:56:49 PM  

#23  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: GreatestJeneration   2004-08-30 5:51:29 PM  

#22  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2004-08-30 5:29:27 PM  

#21  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: mojo   2004-08-30 3:00:56 PM  

#20  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Matt   2004-08-30 2:45:09 PM  

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: RN   2004-08-30 2:42:47 PM  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: jules 187   2004-08-30 2:36:58 PM  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Ptah   2004-08-30 2:32:09 PM  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Lucky   2004-08-30 2:28:50 PM  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: eLarson   2004-08-30 1:49:36 PM  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Jarhead   2004-08-30 1:48:56 PM  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: CrazyFool   2004-08-30 1:06:10 PM  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Rex Mundi   2004-08-30 12:37:44 PM  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: remote man   2004-08-30 12:30:05 PM  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Rex Mundi   2004-08-30 12:24:09 PM  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Matt   2004-08-30 11:27:59 AM  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2004-08-30 9:32:31 AM  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: eLarson   2004-08-30 9:01:47 AM  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mitch H.   2004-08-30 8:55:51 AM  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bill Nelson   2004-08-30 8:39:42 AM  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Dave D.   2004-08-30 6:43:28 AM  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2004-08-30 6:38:00 AM  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2004-08-30 6:35:31 AM  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2004-08-30 6:29:33 AM  

00:00