You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Tech
Military close to replacing the M-16
2004-08-10
Actual Article includes pics and a video.
NEW YORK — U.S. soldiers have been waiting for a long time for weapons to replace current ones that rely on Vietnam-era technology. And the new weapons are right around the corner.

One of these weapons is the XM-8 (search), a rifle with chameleon-like qualities that allows soldiers to interchange parts, outfitting it for urban warfare or long-range sniping. Military and civilian weapons experts are still working out the kinks in the XM-8, which will replace the M-16.

"The ability to reconfigure the weapon to the mission was very, very important. ... It grew out of soldiers telling us they need these kinds of capabilities," said Col. Michael J. Smith, project manager for Soldier Weapons.

The XM-8 is designed to be lighter and more user-friendly than current weapons. It is part of a new family of weapons, including machine-gun type weapons like the XM-307 and XM-312 that are lethal at more than a mile away.

In addition to being lighter, the new technology in the XM-8 makes hitting targets extremely easy. The rifle could be in soldiers' hands as early as next summer.
Posted by:2%

#20  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Phil Fraering   2004-09-01 9:23:59 PM  

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2004-09-01 9:13:34 PM  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anonymous5089   2004-08-11 09:16  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Edward Yee   2004-08-10 23:16  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Phil Fraering   2004-08-10 21:37  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: whitecollar redneck   2004-08-10 19:37  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Oldspook   2004-08-10 18:49  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Shipman   2004-08-10 18:13  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: spiffo   2004-08-10 18:13  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Silentbrick   2004-08-10 18:03  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: snellenr   2004-08-10 17:42  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anonymous4021   2004-08-10 17:41  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: ed   2004-08-10 17:24  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: badanov   2004-08-10 16:55  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Shep UK   2004-08-10 16:49  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anonymous4021   2004-08-10 16:48  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: DCD   2004-08-10 16:46  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2004-08-10 16:34  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: eLarson   2004-08-10 16:27  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anonymous4021   2004-08-10 15:44  

00:00