You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Israel-Palestine
Israel’s Fence Encloses Less Than 1% of West Bank’s Palestinians
2004-05-22
David Makovsky has just completed a monograph for the Washington Institute for Near East Policy in which he analyzes the fence as it is actually being constructed. He’s found that the fence is generally following the route Bill Clinton had proposed as a possible border between Israel and a future Palestinian state. Makovsky counted the populations of all the villages and settlements on each side of the fence. He found that "fewer than 13,000 Palestinians — that is, less than 1 percent of the West Bank total — will actually be stranded on the Israeli side of the barrier." About 54,000 Israeli settlers, a quarter of the settler population, will be on the Palestinian side.

In other words, the fence leaves 99 percent of the West Bank Palestinians on a contiguous 87.5 percent chunk of West Bank land. That is a reasonably fair provisional border, which the two sides can modify if they ever get around to cooperating. The Israelis initially planned a much more intrusive fence. But skillful diplomacy by Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice, Stephen Hadley, Elliot Abrams and other U.S. officials led to modifications. For example, the Israelis initially wanted to build a series of secondary fences that would have enclosed Palestinians. One of those deeper fences would have encircled 65,000 Arabs just east of the Tel Aviv airport. The U.S. prevailed on Israel to abandon those plans.
Posted by:Mike Sylwester

#24  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Antiwar   2004-05-22 12:59:26 PM  

#23  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Antiwar   2004-05-22 12:08:03 PM  

#22  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Antiwar   2004-05-22 11:26:53 AM  

#21  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: docob   2004-05-22 8:34:42 PM  

#20  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Dave D.   2004-05-22 8:07:06 PM  

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Curious   2004-05-22 8:02:25 PM  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: AntiPasto   2004-05-22 7:42:26 PM  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2004-05-22 6:18:40 PM  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: AzCat   2004-05-22 3:34:40 PM  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2004-05-22 3:07:27 PM  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mike Sylwester   2004-05-22 2:12:18 PM  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: AzCat   2004-05-22 1:59:50 PM  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank G   2004-05-22 1:23:29 PM  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: whitecollar redneck   2004-05-22 1:00:01 PM  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anonymoose   2004-05-22 12:59:45 PM  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Antiwar TROLL   2004-05-22 12:59:26 PM  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Phil B   2004-05-22 12:23:10 PM  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Raptor   2004-05-22 12:20:07 PM  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: RWV   2004-05-22 12:19:56 PM  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Antiwar TROLL   2004-05-22 12:08:03 PM  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2004-05-22 11:56:07 AM  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Phil B   2004-05-22 11:51:00 AM  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Antiwar TROLL   2004-05-22 11:26:53 AM  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2004-05-22 10:28:56 AM  

00:00