| Submit your comments on this article |
| -Short Attention Span Theater- |
| Nuclear answer |
| 2004-06-07 |
| Forgive the bandwidth, Fred, but I was busy and did not get to respond to the Nukes debate of a few days ago. People were ignorant of nuclear accidents, and the costs of the nuclear industry, mistakenly believing that Chernobyl is about the only Nuke accident ever. Here are some facts and resources for people. Bear in mind this is brief: what I found in 5 mins on the internet. I once had far more resources at my disposal once but at present I am far from home. HEALTH EFFECTS of exposure to radiation: âRadiation exposure, like exposure to the sun, is cumulative.â Source: CDC CUMULATIVE means that the harmful effects build up over time they donât go away. Every small bit of radiation you are exposed to increases your chances of getting cancer or passing on genetic defects to your children. There is NO SAFE DOSE OF RADIATION. It is a lottery as to whether the radiation strikes out a gene in your DNA that is harmless or one that causes the cell to malfunction and become cancerous. SOURCE: greenie site but medical doctors agree and despite controversy evidence is good. People already suffer cancers simply as a result of the background radiation that everyone is exposed to from the Sun and radioactive particles in the air and water. This is unavoidable. But even small leaks of radioactivity from nuclear power plants increase the background level of radiation. As it is CUMULATIVE, this increases the rates of cancer and birth defects in populations exposed to it. You cannot get it out of the environment either once itâs out there in the food chain. Hereâs a brief discussion of some of the health effects of radiation written about the Hanford accident: Link NUCLEAR REACTORS HAVE PLENTY OF ACCIDENTS NOT JUST CHERNOBYL: In response to the poster who made the claim that France relies on N-power and has no accidents: The froggies have never been ones to admit when they make mistakes. Theyâd much rather cover it up. But in case you think the French are so superior that unlike the other developed nations that use N-power and have had thousands of accidents, they have had none, here are a selection (ie: not all just some): 22-09-1980: Pump failure causes accidental release of radioactive water at La Hague reprocessing plant (France)SOURCE: Note: this is sourced from Greenpeace who I disagree with on many issues (eg: global warming), but this is a simple list of facts that are easily independently checkable: Link EXPENSIVE INEFFICIENCY OF REACTORS: Unlike conventional power plants, nuclear plants have a relatively short life-span -- 30 years -- before critical reactor components become irreparably radioactive. At that point the plant must be decommissioned (`mothballedâ) at a cost of over $100 million, or else its entire reactor core replaced. [oh, so cheap, so efficient!] Compounding the storage problem is an accumulation of spent radioactive fuel rods, which have a life-span of only three years. [Oh but theyâre so small, they hardly take up any space!!!! Just a little problem, easily solvable⊠just not in my backyard, thanks!] SOURCE: as below. PARTIAL LIST OF ACCIDENTS AT US REACTORS (there have been thousands of minor and mid-level accidents but for brevity and laziness here are just a few.) SOURCE: Link
HEREâS A LIST OF MORE ACCIDENTS FROM THE 1990s Link including that of Hanford, Washington, where wildfires burnt the reactor. GIVE UP on the nuclear fantasy, it isnât the great powersource of the future that itâs cracked up to be. The other alternatives may not ALL be applicable in EVERY situation. They may not be cheap â in fact they are expensive. But they come without the social cost of Nukes. This fantasy is a dead-end path. Forget it, itâs over. Nobody wants the waste, it cannot be safely stored and even if you can guarantee that you can store it for a thousand years you cannot guarantee that human beings will remember where it is or understand that they cannot go digging there. As Gandalf said (loosely paraphrased) in Lord of the Rings: âyou think only of yourselves, and this time. But there are people yet to be born and time still to be. They are also my concern.â You cannot guarantee against human error. You cannot guarantee against outside events such as the fire that caused the Hanford disaster: sabotage, flooding, earthquake, terrorist strikes. You cannot guarantee the stability of civic society beyond the next 100 years let alone the next 10,000. This means that you cannot guarantee the safety and efficiency of Nuclear reactors as a source of power. They are too expensive and Iâm not willing to pay the price! Find another way. |
| Posted by:Anon1 |
| #12 |
| Posted by: Anon1 2004-06-09 9:14:01 AM |
| #11 |
| Posted by: .com 2004-06-09 9:08:12 AM |
| #10 |
| Posted by: Anon1 2004-06-09 9:03:39 AM |
| #9 |
| Posted by: .com 2004-06-08 4:13:41 AM |
| #8 |
| Posted by: Anon1 2004-06-08 4:04:42 AM |
| #7 |
| Posted by: Phil B 2004-06-08 3:31:28 AM |
| #6 |
| Posted by: Anon1 2004-06-07 11:59:21 PM |
| #5 |
| Posted by: Frank G 2004-06-07 11:42:14 PM |
| #4 |
| Posted by: Phil B 2004-06-07 11:37:44 PM |
| #3 |
| Posted by: Anon1 2004-06-07 11:24:42 PM |
| #2 |
| Posted by: davemac 2004-06-07 11:12:40 PM |
| #1 |
| Posted by: Phil B 2004-06-07 10:52:01 PM |