You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Terror Networks
Bin Laden Capture Rumor
2004-01-23
Here’s another take on the rumor circulating yesterday. I’ve been following this site for about a month. They’re a little alarmist, but also useful. They do not have permalinks on individual entries. Scroll down. EFL
22 January 2004; 1905 EST: UPDATE: We are aware of the denials issued by the United States Department of State and the reports of US denials carried by various news outlets such as Reuters that Osama bin Laden has not been captured. We became aware of the initial rumor of his capture at the time it began circulating earlier today, and we were fully aware of the official denial. We do have verifiable intelligence, however, of "unusual movements and activities" of special US forces in certain areas where bin Laden and al Zawahiri have reportedly been seen - however we will NOT disclose this information to avoid compromising the safety, welfare and special operations of our men and women of the military. According to two highly placed and credible human sources within the intelligence community, these movements are indeed related to a "HVT" (High Value Target) within al Qaeda. Our sources are firm in their assertions that there is a "significant advancement" in the ongoing war on terror.
Posted by:Pete Stanley

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: tu3031   2004-1-23 8:50:45 PM  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Gasse Katze   2004-1-23 4:17:31 PM  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Matt   2004-1-23 2:39:08 PM  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Frank Martin   2004-1-23 1:57:53 PM  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Jarhead   2004-1-23 1:06:58 PM  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: whitecollar redneck   2004-1-23 12:44:23 PM  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: El Id   2004-1-23 12:38:28 PM  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: whitecollar redneck   2004-1-23 12:34:16 PM  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: 4thInfVet   2004-1-23 10:49:15 AM  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anonymous   2004-1-23 9:40:02 AM  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Pete Stanley   2004-1-23 3:39:55 AM  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Igs   2004-1-23 2:14:42 AM  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Dan Darling   2004-1-23 1:38:20 AM  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Lucky   2004-1-23 1:31:33 AM  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: OldSpook   2004-1-23 1:11:54 AM  

00:00