You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caribbean
Going, going, gone
2004-01-05
EFL:
Navy ships are vanishing from Roosevelt Roads Naval Station, ending an era when defense spending boosted Puerto Rico’s economy and the U.S. territory was seen as a strategic asset. The military has used the base for six decades to keep watch over the Caribbean, and as the outpost closes, with thousands of troops and civilians to leave by March 31, Puerto Rico is losing an economic powerhouse that employed more than 6,000 people and brought an estimated $300 million a year to the island. Some islanders who see the base as a relic of colonialism are applauding its demise, but others fear for the future now that the United States needs Puerto Rico less for military purposes.
Thank you, Reverend Al...
When Roosevelt Roads closes, Guantanamo Bay in Cuba will be the only U.S. naval base left in the Caribbean. No ships had their home port at Roosevelt Roads, but destroyers, cruisers and aircraft carriers passed through constantly for maneuvers or refueling. It was a support base for U.S. invasions of the Dominican Republic in 1965, Grenada in 1983 and Haiti in 1994. But its main purpose was to oversee bombing exercises on Vieques. Tensions between the Navy and locals heightened when two errant bombs in 1999 killed a civilian guard on Vieques, leading the Navy to close the range this year. Opponents said the bombing harmed the environment, the health of Vieques’ 9,100 residents and its sole industries of fishing and tourism.
They wanted to grab Vieques and build condos and hotels. Bush outflanked them and turned it into a wildlife refuge.
Some Puerto Ricans say the departure could mark a realignment in U.S. relations with the territory of 4 million people, which was seized from Spain in 1898. President Bush recently named a 16-member panel to re-evaluate Puerto Rico’s status, under which islanders pay no U.S. income taxes but receive $14 billion yearly in federal funds. Martes said she fears the U.S. government has decided "if they don’t want us, then we don’t need them."
It’s that Cause/Efect thing again.
Supporters of the small independence movement, meanwhile, say the Navy’s departure is a death knell for what they call U.S. colonialism. Other politicians who support statehood or the status quo disagree, saying the territory of 4 million people retains close ties to the United States. The Army still has Fort Buchanan near San Juan, and officials say more than 1,000 troops from Puerto Rico are in the Middle East. Gov. Sila Calderon, who favors the current commonwealth status, initially sought to persuade the Navy to stay. But her delegate to Congress, Anibal Acevedo Vila, says he helped negotiate a "good deal" for Puerto Rico to get lands unclaimed by the U.S. government. "There are going to be a lot of companies interested in investing," said Acevedo Vila, a gubernatorial candidate who cites building a theme park among possibilities.
Guess we know where his campaign contributions are coming from.
A decade ago, Roosevelt Roads was the biggest American naval installation in land area outside the U.S. mainland, with more than 30,000 acres including Vieques lands. As it closes, Puerto Rico faces 12 percent unemployment island-wide, with higher jobless rates near the base. The Navy hasn’t allowed journalists to visit, but employees say the airstrip and port are vacant, and housing complexes are clearing out. One officer called it a "ghost town." The number of troops and civilians is down to 2,200, and some 1,200 contractors are to lose base jobs. Others already have. "It’s sad," said Hipolito Robles, 44, a Navy veteran who lost his contract job as a maintenance supervisor a year ago. "People in Puerto Rico still don’t realize the impact it’s going to have."
This has been a real low-profile closing, Army South HQ is also moving out of Fort Buchahan to Fort Sam Houston. One of the unspoken reasons was that they couldn’t find enough local people willing to work for them.
Posted by:Steve

#37  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: War46   2004-1-5 11:03:48 PM  

#36  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Pedantic Carl in NH   2004-1-5 9:57:05 PM  

#35  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Super Hose   2004-1-5 9:54:17 PM  

#34  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Fred   2004-1-5 9:37:59 PM  

#33  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Super Hose   2004-1-5 6:18:48 PM  

#32  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2004-1-5 6:17:49 PM  

#31  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2004-1-5 5:55:19 PM  

#30  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: buwaya   2004-1-5 5:51:35 PM  

#29  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Shipman   2004-1-5 4:55:57 PM  

#28  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: CrazyFool   2004-1-5 4:33:13 PM  

#27  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anonymous   2004-1-5 4:08:35 PM  

#26  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Pete Stanley   2004-1-5 4:06:16 PM  

#25  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Shipman   2004-1-5 3:15:31 PM  

#24  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: .com   2004-1-5 3:14:05 PM  

#23  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Emperor Misha I   2004-1-5 2:38:22 PM  

#22  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Tresho   2004-1-5 2:35:54 PM  

#21  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: buwaya   2004-1-5 2:24:21 PM  

#20  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: buwaya   2004-1-5 2:20:30 PM  

#19  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anonymous   2004-1-5 2:19:42 PM  

#18  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Ed Becerra   2004-1-5 2:15:28 PM  

#17  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Old Patriot   2004-1-5 1:31:13 PM  

#16  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Mike   2004-1-5 1:30:31 PM  

#15  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JFM   2004-1-5 12:55:47 PM  

#14  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Super Hose   2004-1-5 12:54:56 PM  

#13  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Super Hose   2004-1-5 12:46:46 PM  

#12  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anonymous2U   2004-1-5 12:36:34 PM  

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: buwaya   2004-1-5 12:29:59 PM  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: buwaya   2004-1-5 12:27:53 PM  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2004-1-5 12:24:02 PM  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: mojo   2004-1-5 12:12:21 PM  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: VAMark   2004-1-5 11:28:06 AM  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anonymous2U   2004-1-5 10:31:56 AM  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Kentar   2004-1-5 10:31:29 AM  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: flash91   2004-1-5 10:07:06 AM  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Ptah   2004-1-5 9:57:06 AM  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2004-1-5 9:56:10 AM  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Lizzel   2004-1-5 9:53:09 AM  

00:00