You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Archaeologists find ‘temple’ remains at Babri mosque site
2003-08-26
A 574-page report of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) unveiled in court on Monday said that excavations at the site of the destroyed Babri mosque in Ayodhya had found features of a 10th century structure that resemble a temple. Buoyed by the report, Hindu organisations asked for a quick judicial verdict. Muslim groups rejected the report, saying it was “concocted, vague, contradictory and aimed at reaping a political harvest”. However, the ASI report does not specifically call the construction a temple.
It just walks like a duck. It quacks sometimes. It has webbed feet. Could be something else. Good Muslims will reject it.
The report said there was “archaeological evidence of a massive structure just below the disputed structure (Babri mosque) and evidence of continuity in structural activities from the 10th century onwards up to the construction of the disputed structure”. Among the excavation yields it mentioned were stone and decorated bricks as well as a mutilated sculpture of a divine couple; 50 pillar bases with carvings including foliage patterns, amalaka, kapotapali; a doorjamb with a semi-circular shrine pilaster; a broken octagonal shaft of black schist pillar and lotus motifs; and a circular shrine with a waterchute. These features were “indicative of remains which are distinctive features found associated with the temples of the north,” said the report.
Uhuh. Probably a bath house or a beer joint or something...
Posted by:Fred Pruitt

#11  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Slappy   2003-8-27 12:43:02 AM  

#10  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2003-8-26 5:07:08 PM  

#9  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Steve   2003-8-26 3:03:38 PM  

#8  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2003-8-26 2:32:17 PM  

#7  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Tom   2003-8-26 2:30:50 PM  

#6  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Old Patriot   2003-8-26 12:52:44 PM  

#5  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Lucky   2003-8-26 12:48:19 PM  

#4  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Steve   2003-8-26 11:55:49 AM  

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: mojo   2003-8-26 11:20:48 AM  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: snellenr   2003-8-26 9:20:46 AM  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anonymous   2003-8-26 9:19:17 AM  

00:00