You have commented 375 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International
Muslim alliance derails UN’s gay rights resolution
2003-04-25
A UN vote on homosexual human rights was yesterday derailed at the last minute by an alliance of disapproving Muslim countries. The UN had been due to vote on the matter for the first time, but five Muslim countries delayed the vote until today and introduced amendments designed to kill it off. The amendments remove all references to discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, and render the resolution meaningless. UN sources said Pakistan, Egypt, Libya, Saudi Arabia and Malaysia were doing everything they could to stop the resolution. "I suspect they want to stall as much as possible and lobby other countries to win support for their amendments," said a source.

The historic resolution on "human rights and sexual orientation" was originally tabled by Brazil at the UN commission on human rights, in Geneva, with the support of 19 other countries including Britain. It calls on all UN member states to promote and protect the human rights "of all persons regardless of their sexual orientation". But the sentiments are anathema to many UN states; almost half outlaw gay sexual relations and more than 70 countries keep a total ban on homosexuality — in some cases it is punished by death. The British gay rights campaigner, Peter Tatchell, said: "The vote has been derailed and delayed by Islamic fundamentalist states where gay people are either jailed, flogged or beheaded." He said those countries' records of gay human rights abuses showed why the resolution was urgently needed.
I'm sure Hollywood's reaction to this action will be deafening, right? Hello? (crickets chirping) Hello? Paging Tim Robbins!
Posted by:Steve

#3  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: Anonymous   2003-04-25 11:22:39  

#2  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: JTE   2003-04-25 10:55:44  

#1  comments); ?>werwer
Posted by: rg117   2003-04-25 10:50:54  

00:00