Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg
Sameeh Hammoudeh Sameeh Hammoudeh Islamic Academy of Florida Home Front 20030220  
  Sameeh Hammoudeh Palestinian Islamic Jihad Home Front: WoT In Jug 20030220  
    charged with racketeering, conspiracy, and providing material support to a terrorist organization.

Home Front: WoT
Palestinian deported after Florida Jihad trial
2006-05-25
TAMPA, Florida (Reuters) - A co-defendant who was acquitted of all charges in the Florida terrorism trial of ex-college professor Sami al-Arian has been deported to the Palestinian territories, a U.S. official said on Wednesday.

Federal agents took Sameeh Hammoudeh from a prison near Tampa on Monday and escorted him to Ramallah in the West Bank. He had agreed to be deported after pleading guilty to a separate tax fraud charge. Hammoudeh's wife and six children were taken to Ramallah in February. "The order of deportation has been carried out. Sameeh Hammoudeh is in Palestinian territory," said Barbara Gonzalez, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
So long, loser, enjoy your stay in Ramallah. Say 'hi' to the IDF for us.
Link


Fifth Column
CAIR and Islamic Jihad
2006-05-23
H/T Jihad Watch.
By Joe Kaufman

Last week, I attended the funeral for Daniel Wultz, the young boy from Weston, Florida, who was the unfortunate victim of a suicide bombing that took place in Tel Aviv, Israel, one month ago. I stood there, amongst hundreds of people, to pay my respects to the friends and family of this beautiful boy. Sadness and anger welled up inside me – sadness for what Daniel’s loved ones had to go through and anger for the event that took this 16-year-old’s life and for the powerful who allow those responsible – both directly and indirectly – to walk free on this earth, including within the United States. One organization, in particular, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), demands attention for its past and current history connecting it to the main group involved in the attack – Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ).

Two Sundays ago, an e-mail was sent out by CAIR denouncing the website, Little Green Footballs (LGF), for what CAIR said were two threats aimed at Muslims found in the comments section of a blog entry on the site. One of the comments was no doubt a threat. It stated, “The next time someone in a truckstop or a Starbucks or a library or any public place says ANYTHING even resembling support for the Muslim ‘cause’ WILL be sent to either the hospital or worse. . .just waiting to bash someones face in. no more games.” To the website’s credit, the dangerous comment was removed. The other quote, which was a strongly worded statement against the religion of Islam and those the author referred to as “Muslim savages,” was allowed to stay and was later debated.

While CAIR proudly displayed the offending quotes and, at the same time, unjustly and irresponsibly labeled LGF an “internet hate site,” a vital piece of information was missing from the e-mail. The blog entry, from where the quotes came, was an announcement of the death of Daniel Wultz, who had passed soon after waking out of a nine-day coma. The entry was titled, ‘US Teen Murdered by Palestinians.’

Many of the blog comments offered prayers to the Wultz family. Others dealt with the terrorist groups’ reactions to Wultz’s injuries. In an interview with Aaron Klein from World Net Daily, Abu Ayman, a PIJ leader, said, “Our hero believed in Allah and died while fighting for Allah but your pig was killed in a restaurant in an area full of prostitution.” And Abu Nasser, a leader of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, the other group responsible for the attack, stated, “This is a gift from Allah. We wish this young dog will go directly with no transit to hell.” With comments such as these and others made before them, posters on LGF were understandably upset.

CAIR strangely left all of that out. Why?

CAIR’s parent organization, the Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP) was incorporated in Chicago, Illinois, in November of 1981. [CAIR would later be created in 1994.] One of the IAP’s founders, Sami Al-Arian, was, at the time, a doctoral student at North Carolina State University. According to a news report from the Palestine Chronicle, “Dr. Al-Arian was the primary advocate for IAP's work to be the focus of efforts for the Palestinian cause… Under the IAP he developed the Arabic magazine Tareeq Filistine (Road to Palestine)…”

In addition, Al-Arian had, a couple years prior, been involved with a group of Palestinian students in Cairo that had formed a violent breakaway faction from the Islamic Society (a.k.a. Muslim Brotherhood Palestine) called Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ). In 1981, the same year Al-Arian helped found the IAP, PIJ was expelled from Egypt, due to the group’s close relationship with those that assassinated Egyptian President Anwar Sadat.

After the onset of the Intifada in 1987, Al Arian created an entire infrastructure for PIJ, within a house, an office complex and a children’s school, all based in Tampa Bay, Florida. During a 1991 Cleveland fundraiser, one of these PIJ fronts, Al-Arian’s Islamic Committee for Palestine (a.k.a. Islamic Concern Project), was labeled “the active arm of the Islamic Jihad movement in Palestine.”

Over a decade later, when Al-Arian would be taken into custody by the U.S. government, Ahmed Bedier, the Communications Director for CAIR-Florida and the Director of CAIR’s Tampa office, would act as Al-Arian’s chief spokesperson in the media, which has been the case to this day. As evidence of this, last April, when Al-Arian agreed to a plea agreement and eventual deportation, Bedier called a press conference to discuss Al-Arian’s family’s situation and how Al-Arian “has stayed true to his convictions.”

As spokesman, Bedier has used his position to advocate moving Al-Arian’s trial out of Tampa and to lament to the media about the treatment of Al-Arian by the U.S. government and the judge that was presiding over Al-Arian’s case, James Moody. Concerning Judge Moody’s courtroom remarks a few weeks ago, during which time Al-Arian was sentenced to 57 months in prison, Bedier described the judge’s words as a “political speech” and said Moody’s comments were “biased and unfair.”

On his radio show, True Talk, Bedier has used his forum as a mouthpiece for Al-Arian and his PIJ colleagues. Since November of 2005, he has had on his show: Al-Arian’s co-defendant, Ghassan Ballut; co-defendant, Sameeh Hammoudeh (interviewed from his Bradenton, Florida prison); Hammoudeh’s daughter, Weeam; Al-Arian’s wife, Nahla; Al-Arian’s daughter, Leila; Al-Arian’s son, Abdullah; and numerous other Al-Arian supporters and shills.

Besides Bedier, Sami Al-Arian has received much support from CAIR’s Executive Director, Nihad Awad. Last February, Awad, along with Eric Vickers, a man that had called the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster “an act of divine retribution against Israel,” spoke at a fundraiser for Al-Arian’s release. The event was held at Masjid Al-Qassam (a.k.a. Islamic Community of Tampa), the mosque Al-Arian helped found, which was named after the infamous PIJ mosque in Gaza. The next day, Awad and Vickers were listed as speakers at a vigil for Al-Arian, outside the Hillsborough County Orient Road Jail, where Al-Arian was being detained. Pictures from the vigil were found on the website belonging to Bedier’s assistant in the Tampa-CAIR office, Danya Shakfeh.

There is a feeling, within those in CAIR and its well traveled circles, that what Al-Arian and his cohorts have done amounts to nothing more than legitimate political expression – that they are being persecuted for merely being Palestinian activists. As stated by Nihad Awad, on Ahmed Bedier’s January 6, 2006 radio program, “We’re talking about Free Speech in America, and Sami Al-Arian, now, is being punished and penalized for his association and for his views on politics in the Middle East... Sami Al-Arian should not be the victim of political misunderstanding…”

This delusional attitude towards PIJ from CAIR was even more blatant, in December of 2005, when Ahmed Bedier appeared on a local Tampa television show, ‘Your Turn with Kathy Fountain.’ After being asked by the host if he believed there was anything immoral about Al-Arian’s connection to PIJ, Bedier said that, “before 1995, there was nothing immoral about it.”

But Mr. Bedier is wrong. There was and always will be something immoral about it. The fact is that, prior to 1995, PIJ had taken credit for five terrorist attacks, including one suicide bombing, which resulted in the deaths of eight innocent people. Only those with no capacity for emotion would believe otherwise.

And with regard to Mr. Awad’s statement that Al-Arian is being punished for his political views, Sami Al-Arian was a founder and leader of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, an organization responsible for hundreds of murders, usually via the most cruel and inhuman means possible. [A list of these murders can be found on the website of the Jewish Virtual Library. The last name on the list, as of this writing, is that of Daniel Wultz.] Murder, unbeknownst to Nihad Awad, does not equal Free Speech.

In 1991, Sami Al-Arian had sponsored the visa of a man named Ramadan Abdullah Shallah to enter the United States. Soon, Shallah would get involved in one of the PIJ fronts Al-Arian created, the World Islam Studies Enterprise (WISE). In the Spring of 1994, Al-Arian had successfully convinced the University of South Florida (USF), where Al-Arian was teaching, to hire Shallah. In the Summer of 1995, Shallah suddenly left town in Tampa, soon to reemerge as the new head (Secretary General) of PIJ. [The previous head, Fathi Shiqaqi, had been executed, in Malta.]

According to former federal prosecutor, John Loftus, Al-Arian barely missed becoming Secretary General of PIJ, himself. Because of this, a question must be asked: What would CAIR and groups like it have said about Al-Arian, if the roles were reversed, if Shallah had stayed home and Al-Arian had left for Gaza or Damascus to become the head of PIJ? And instead of Shallah orchestrating the suicide bombing, in Tel Aviv, that ended Daniel Wultz’s life, it was Al-Arian. Would CAIR then say that Al-Arian was practicing “Free Speech” or was the subject of a “political misunderstanding?”

Of course, these questions don’t have any real bearing, because the given scenario never occurred. However, there is one question that does need to be answered, and that is this: If it were not for Sami Al-Arian, or PIJ for that matter, would CAIR even exist?

“He loved life, and those were his last words to the doctor who took him in, ‘I want to live.’” - Tuly Wultz, about his son Daniel Wultz (1990-2006)
Link


Home Front: WoT
Al-Arian may avoid new terror trial
2006-01-08
Attorneys for Sami Al-Arian and a co-defendant on Friday revealed they are negotiating with federal prosecutors to avert a new trial after jurors last month deadlocked on some terrorism-related counts while acquitting them of most charges.

"We're discussing matters to resolve it," said Assistant Federal Public Defender Kevin Beck, moments after representing defendant Hatem Fariz, 32, in federal court. "There is certainly a benefit to both parties to avoid the costs, the risks of another trial."

In court, a prosecutor said the government had not reached a final decision on whether to retry the men.

A new trial could take up to two months, and the government would need until August to prepare, said Executive Assistant U.S. Attorney Terry Zitek.

Al-Arian, who was fired as a University of South Florida professor after his arrest in February 2003, is accused of running a Palestinian Islamic Jihad terrorist cell and using the university and nonprofits as cover to help foment and finance suicide bombings in Israel and the Palestinian territories.

The computer-science instructor, a permanent U.S. resident, remains jailed without bail awaiting the government's next move. Jurors acquitted Al-Arian, 47, on eight charges, including conspiracy to maim or kill civilians abroad, and deadlocked on nine others.

Fariz, a Spring Hill office manager and former Chicago-area Muslim community leader, has been free on bail and was acquitted of 25 charges while jurors deadlocked on seven counts.

A month ago, after a six-month trial, jurors also cleared two fellow Palestinians, Chicago-area businessman Ghassan Ballut, 43, and former USF graduate student Sameeh Hammoudeh, 45, on all charges.

The failure to net a single verdict is considered a setback for prosecutors and the Department of Justice, which billed it as one of its marquee terrorism-finance prosecutions after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

The case also exemplified the controversial USA Patriot Act, which allowed prosecutors to introduce intelligence and wiretaps collected by FBI agents on Al-Arian since 1991.

Outside the courthouse, dozens of supporters as well as Muslim and Christian activists braved the cold, blustery winds to demand that he be freed. They waved an American flag on a pole and held an 8-foot effigy of a white-draped Lady Justice and chanted, "What do we want? Justice. And when do we want it? Now."

Like other Muslim-American leaders who flew in from around the country to speak on Al-Arian's behalf, Nihad Awad said Al-Arian was the victim of a politically charged environment three years ago that resulted in the persecution of Muslims.

"Is this about what we did or what we are?" said Awad, executive director of the Council on American Islamic Relations civil rights group in Washington. "Most of these cases are done for political reasons. . . . I think the government is abusing the system."

Signs in the crowd included "Liberty and Justice For All," "Free Al-Arian," "All Religions Believe in Justice," and "The Patriot Act is Watching You."

Speaking outside the courthouse, Al-Arian's attorney William Moffitt also confirmed discussions with prosecutors on several fronts, but he did not elaborate.

"There are things that we can't talk about," Moffitt said when asked about possible negotiations.

Earlier, in a status conference hearing before U.S. District Judge James Moody Jr., Moffitt asked for a closed hearing that lasted seven minutes.

Talks between government and defense attorneys could mean a possible plea deal or collaboration in exchange for lighter sentences.

However, Beck was adamant his client, Fariz, would not testify against Al-Arian or anyone else. Five other indicted co-defendants, including Al-Arian's brother-in-law Mazen Al-Najjar, remain at large overseas.

"There will be no cooperation. I can tell you that unabashedly," he said.

Government attorneys are not speaking publicly. "We are not going to comment beyond what was said in court," said Steve Cole, a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's Office.

During the brief public portion of the status hearing, prosecutor Zitek told Moody the government still is weighing its options. "We are inclined, at this point, to continue proceedings but we haven't made a final decision," Zitek said.

Prosecutors have until Friday to answer motions by defense attorneys seeking acquittal and dismissal of the case.

Even if the government declines to retry Al-Arian and he is released on the criminal charges, the U.S. Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement will hold him without bail to face deportation proceedings in immigration court.

"We have to be very careful at this moment about how we approach the bond issue," Moffit said. "Because we don't want Dr. Al-Arian whisked away to some immigration facility where we have difficulty in communicating with him."

The prospect of continued incarceration is just not acceptable, say his family and supporters.

"Respect for human rights, not in some other country . . . but right here in our own community . . . demands that the court release Dr. Al-Arian immediately," said the Rev. Warren Clark, pastor of First United Church of Tampa and a spokesman for the group Tampa Bay Friends of Human Rights.

Nahla Al-Arian, the professor's wife, said she remains hopeful and optimistic that prosecutors will not seek another trial.

"In the end, I feel comfortable that we are going to win, with or without a trial," she said on the courthouse steps.
Link


Fifth Column
Acquitting a Terrorist
2005-12-07
By Joe Kaufman

“Today, the United States Department of Justice is announcing the indictment of Sami al-Arian and seven co-conspirators.” That’s how United States Attorney General John Ascroft began his press conference, back in February of 2003. It was a momentous day in the war on terrorism, a triumph of the Patriot Act. We caught a leader of a terrorist ring based in Tampa, Florida, and he and at least some of his compatriots were going to be brought to justice. Now, it appears justice may not have been served.

Yesterday, al-Arian and his three friends were acquitted after five months of hearing testimony that seemed to point to the contrary. Of the 17 counts al-Arian was charged with, he was acquitted on eight of them, including “conspiracy to murder and maim people abroad,” the most serious charge. The remaining nine were considered a mistrial, as the jury was deadlocked on them. Two of his co-defendants, Sameeh Hammoudeh and Ghassan Zayed Ballut, were acquitted of all charges against them. The other, Hatem Naji Fariz, was found not guilty of 24 counts, and jurors deadlocked on the remaining eight.

Until we hear from the jurors, it’s hard to say how this could possibly have happened. The judge in the trial, James S. Moody, had stipulated to the jury that the prosecution needed to prove that the money allegedly going from Tampa to the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) was sent for the purpose of violence. Is it possible that anything related to PIJ can be disassociated with violence? It is a terrorist organization. Did the defense convince the jurors that this was all one big political demonstration against the “Zionists” based on the Israeli-Palestinian situation?

I cannot envision either of the above occurring, because I attended the trial. Along with the jurors, I watched the video of the 1991 Cleveland fundraiser, in which al-Arian begged his audience to create a Palestine “from the river to the sea,” concluding:

Thus is the way of jihad. Thus is the way of martyrdom. Thus is the way of blood, because this is the path to heaven.

Along with the jurors, I watched Fawaz Mohammed “Abu” Damra – the individual that founded al-Qaeda’s main American headquarters in Brooklyn – call al-Arian’s Islamic Committee for Palestine the “active arm of the Islamic Jihad movement in Palestine.” Sami al-Arian was present in the video. Did he disagree? Absolutely not.
Rest at link.
Link


Home Front: WoT
Sami al-Arian walks
2005-12-06
Ratz. Double plus un-good.
federal jury on Tuesday found a former Florida professor not guilty of funding a banned Islamist group in a verdict likely to be seen as a stiff blow to the U.S. government in its attempts to prosecute terror suspects.

The jury in Tampa, Florida, took 13 days to deliver its verdict against Sami al-Arian, who along with three co-defendants was accused of raising money for Palestinian group Islamic Jihad.

The panel, delivering verdicts six months to the day after the trial started, found al-Arian not guilty of conspiracy to murder, providing material support to a terrorist group and obstruction of justice.

The other men, Sameeh Hammoudeh, Hatem Fariz and Ghassan Ballut, were also cleared of most of the charges against them.

The jury was deadlocked on several other charges and U.S. District Judge James Moody declared a mistrial on those counts.

Prosecutors will have to decide whether to retry the men on the undecided charges.

The four were arrested in February 2003 and accused of providing money and support to Islamic Jihad, a Palestinian group the United States designated as a terrorist organization in 1997.

The U.S. government blames Islamic Jihad for killing more than 100 people in Israel, including three Americans.

When the defendants were arrested, then-U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft said al-Arian was Islamic Jihad's North American leader. The defendants denied the charges and said any money they sent to the group was for charitable activities.

The prosecutors' case during the five-month trial in Tampa was based mostly on thousands of hours of wiretapped telephone calls, intercepted e-mails and faxes and bank records gathered over a decade.
Link


Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Florida Professor Acquitted on Some Charges
2005-12-06
Just in from Fox
TAMPA, Fla. — A former Florida professor was acquitted on a key charge Tuesday that he helped lead a Palestinian terrorist group that has carried out suicide bombings against Israel.

In one of the biggest courtroom tests yet of the Patriot Act's expanded search and surveillance powers, the jury acquitted Sami Al-Arian of eight of the 17 counts against him, including a charge of conspiring to maim and murder people overseas.

The jury deadlocked on the others including charges he aided terrorists.

Al-Arian, a former University of South Florida computer engineering professor, wept after the verdicts and his attorney, Linda Moreno hugged him. He will go back to jail until prosecutors decide whether retry him on the deadlocked counts.

Co-defendants Sameeh Hammoudeh and Ghassan Zayed Ballut were acquitted of all charges against them.

Another, Hatem Naji Fariz, was found not guilty of 24 counts and jurors deadlocked on the remaining eight.
Link


Home Front: WoT
Al-Arian Jury Gets Instructions
2005-11-14
The fate of former University of South Florida professor Sami Al-Arian and three other men accused of running an American cell for a Palestinian terrorist group should be in jurors' hands this afternoon. U.S. District Judge James Moody was about a fourth of the way through reading the nearly 100-page jury instructions when the trial broke for lunch Monday. Al-Arian, Ghassan Ballut, Hatim Fariz and Sameeh Hammoudeh are charged with four conspiracy counts alleging racketeering, conspiring to commit murder abroad and to provide material support to the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. They could face life in prison if convicted.
Link


Home Front: WoT
Five-month Florida Jihad trial nears end
2005-11-08
TAMPA, Fla., Nov 7 (Reuters) - A fired Florida university professor and three other Palestinians sent money to a group that they knew had killed Israelis and Americans, a prosecutor said on Monday in closing arguments. The prosecutor's statement came at the end of a five-month trial in one of the most important cases to go before a U.S. court since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington.

Palestinian academic Sami al-Arian was arrested in February 2003, along with Sameeh Hammoudeh, Hatem Fariz and Ghassan Ballut on charges they helped the Palestinian group Islamic Jihad, named by Washington as a terrorist organization. Assistant U.S. Attorney Cherie Krigsman told jurors that evidence indicated the four men raised and sent money to the Palestinian Islamic Jihad "when they knew the PIJ murdered people."
"The evidence has shown time and time again that the defendants acted to further the goals of the PIJ," she said.

Al-Arian, a former professor at the University of South Florida, and the others were charged in a 53-count indictment with conspiracy to commit murder, racketeering, money laundering, immigration fraud and obstruction of justice. If convicted, they could be sentenced to life in prison. The defendants have said any funds they sent to the Islamic Jihad was for charitable activities. Al-Arian said he was being persecuted for his outspoken support of Palestinian causes.

At the time of the indictment, then-U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft said Al-Arian was the Islamic Jihad's North American leader. The United States designated the Islamic Jihad a terrorist organization in 1997 and said it was responsible for killing more than 100 people in Israel, including three Americans. But Krigsman disagreed. "When you support a terrorist group, you support a terrorist group," she said.

Krigsman said there was no direct evidence that the defendants committed any murders. But she told jurors they could use circumstantial evidence and their common sense to find that the defendants were acting to further the goals of the Islamic Jihad.
None of the defendants testified at the trial. Al-Arian and Ballut did not call any witnesses.

Most of the government's evidence was based on thousands of hours of wiretapped telephone calls along with intercepted e-mails and faxes and bank records. Al-Arian founded the Tampa-based Islamic Committee for Palestine and the World and Islam Studies Enterprise. Attorneys for the defendants will make their closing arguments on Tuesday and Wednesday before the case goes to the jury.
Link


Home Front: WoT
Fired Professor Presents No Defense at His Terrorism-Support Trial in Florida
2005-10-27
TAMPA, Fla. (AP) - An attorney defending a fired college professor against federal charges of aiding Palestinian terrorists rested his case Thursday without calling a single witness to refute nearly five months of prosecution testimony. Defense attorney William Moffitt called the prosecution an "all-out assault on the First Amendment" and the right to free speech, and then rested his case for Sami Al-Arian.
Attorneys for three co-defendants began presenting their cases, which could take weeks more. Because the trial was continuing, neither side was immediately available for comment.

Al-Arian, 47, who was fired from the University of South Florida, and his co-defendants - Sameeh Hammoudeh, Ghassan Zayed Ballut and Hatem Naji Fariz - are accused of using Palestinian charities and educational entities as fundraising fronts for the Palestinian Islamic Jihad to support suicide bombings that killed hundreds. The men deny they supported violent acts and say they are being persecuted for views that are unpopular in the United States. Five other men have been indicted but have not been arrested. They are out of the country.

Moffitt's announcement that he was resting his case came the same morning that federal prosecutors wrapped up a case that included testimony from more than 70 witnesses and hundreds of pages of transcripts of wiretapped phone calls and faxes. The communications, intercepted by the FBI from the mid-1990s to about 2003, included discussions about the direction and financing of the PIJ. Other times, the participants appear to celebrate suicide attacks that killed Israelis and speak glowingly of the Palestinian "martyrs" who carried them out.

U.S. District Judge James S. Moody Jr. said he will instruct jurors that prosecutors must have proved that each defendant did something illegal with the "specific intent to further the illegal activities" of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. However, Moody said he also tell them that they can find defendants guilty if prosecutors showed that they sent money to the group knowing that it would or could be used for terrorist acts.
Link


Home Front: WoT
Al-Arian Update: Dismissal requests denied
2005-10-26
The court is back in session and the prosecution is putting on its final witness today. Yesterday, the judge sent the jury out and allowed the defense attorneys to make their case for dismissal. He was not moved by their arguments:
A day before prosecutors finish presenting their case against Sami Al-Arian and three other defendants, the federal judge sent the jury home early Tuesday and asked defense attorneys to make their arguments for dismissing counts.

As a result, spectators got a preview of what may well be the closing arguments for and against Al-Arian, who is charged with conspiring to raise money for the terrorist acts of Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

"In the United States, we punish actors not speakers," said Al-Arian's attorney Bill Moffitt, insisting that "insulting and outrageous speech" was protected under the First Amendment and that "there was not one act associating Dr. Al-Arian with the military wing (of the PIJ)." Moffitt said that Al-Arian affiliated with the PIJ "to feed hungry people" in the occupied territories. "He hasn't persecuted anybody. He has taken an opposite position to our government," said Moffitt.

But federal prosecutor Terry Furr said that the case wasn't about free speech or charity but about the former "USF-professor-by-day spending his nights trying to keep the PIJ alive." Furr characterized the charitable contributions to the occupied territories this way: "Giving that money ... doesn't amount to a hill of spit. The money goes to help people die." The prosecutor did not elaborate on how Al-Arian kept the PIJ alive, or how money raised in Tampa went for violence.

But U.S. District Judge James S. Moody Jr. said he had heard enough, and denied the motions for dismissal.

Earlier, defense attorney Stephen Bernstein told the court that evidence didn't show that his client, Sameeh Hammoudeh, was ever part of Palestinian Islamic Jihad or any agreement having to do with it. "Not one in 80 witnesses testified about Mr. Hammoudeh's knowledge of conspiracy," said Bernstein, who asked that the conspiracy counts be dismissed. But, without hearing counter arguments from prosecutors, the judge denied Bernstein's request.
Link


Home Front: WoT
Al-Arian banked for terror group
2005-09-02
About $2 million from across the globe, including money from a terror group, landed in U.S. bank accounts controlled by former professor Sami Al-Arian and his associates, according to testimony and documents presented Thursday during the former professor's terrorism conspiracy trial.

The money found its way into dozens of bank accounts from places like Switzerland, the Republic of Sudan, the United Arab Emirates and Jordan, according to FBI agent Michael Wysocki, a certified public accountant who specializes in financial crime.

Large sums were sent by top leaders of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, a terror group that Al-Arian and three co-defendants are accused of supporting, financial records presented in court showed.

Prosecutors allege in a 53-count indictment that the men used charitable and educational entities as fronts for laundering money to finance terrorist attacks. The group is blamed for more than 100 killings in Israel, the West Bank and Gaza.

Fathi Shiqaqi, the top leader of the terror group, sent $19,985 to Sameeh Hammoudeh, an Al-Arian co-defendant, in 1994; its treasurer, Muhammed Tasir Hassan Al-Khatib, sent Al-Arian $59,900 in 1990, documents indicated.

In 1992 alone, $875,964 went into accounts controlled by the former university professor and associates, Wysocki said.

However, most of money arrived before 1995, the year President Clinton designated the Palestinian Islamic Jihad a terrorist organization. Thus, William Moffitt, Al-Arian's attorney, suggested such financial transactions were legal when they occurred.

The defendants say they never supported or engaged in violent acts, and are being persecuted for unpopular beliefs.
Link


Home Front: WoT
al-Arian Trial Depicts Islamic Jihad Infighting
2005-07-20
TAMPA - Internal fighting among Palestinian Islamic Jihad members had reached a boiling point and the movement was in financial trouble in 1994.

Sami Al-Arian, then a University of South Florida professor, distributed a proposed resolution, called ``an internal reform project,'' to members of the Islamic Jihad's majlis shura, or governing board.

In it, he proposed creating a committee to control Islamic Jihad money. It would include himself, his brother-in-law Mazen Al-Najjar and Islamic Jihad founder Fathi Shikaki.

A translation of that proposal was among more than 80 exhibits entered into evidence Tuesday during Al-Arian's trial on charges of racketeering and providing material support to terrorists. The exhibits include translations of secretly intercepted telephone calls involving Al-Arian, Shikaki and others. The faxes contain repeated references to the majlis shura, and Al-Arian often refers to himself as ``the secretary.''

FBI agents were able to listen in on the calls and obtain copies of the faxes through warrants obtained under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which authorizes monitoring of people suspected of being agents of a foreign power or terrorist group.

The documents are pivotal to the prosecution's case because they show Al-Arian helping to keep Jihad together when it almost fractured. Assistant U.S. Attorney Walter E. Furr III repeatedly has said that ``for a time, [Al-Arian] was the most powerful man in the world in this organization.''

In a Jan. 22, 1994, call with Shikaki, Al-Arian expresses frustration that the internal power struggle ``is very embarrassing. It's embarrassing in front of the people and embarrassing in the interior and embarrassing everywhere.''

Al-Arian criticized Shikaki's proposal and encouraged him to work toward a consensus.

``When the majority is against it,'' Shikaki responded, ``then I will think about what I will do.''

Other members were upset, Al-Arian said. ``If they didn't have a level of commitment, they would all have left, frankly, among them our brother Ahmed.''

Bashir Nafi, a defendant from England who has not been arrested, used to write under the name Ahmed Sadiq. It is not clear if this reference is to Nafi.

In a handwritten note about two weeks later, Shikaki tells Al-Arian that ``the essential or practical matter is the position of the North, which is more complicated than you imagine.''

Prosecutors say ``the North'' is a coded reference to Iran, which has been the Islamic Jihad's primary financial benefactor.

``What's important,'' Shikaki wrote, ``is that the official communication come from you.''

According to the indictment, other calls deal with Islamic Jihad payments for defendant Sameeh Hammoudeh, Al-Najjar and Ramadan Shallah. Shallah assumed command of the Islamic Jihad in 1995 after Shikaki was gunned down in Malta.

Jurors did not learn details of the transcripts or other translations but are expected to soon. Two FBI contract translators testified Tuesday about how they created English versions of the communications and determined the speaker's identities.

Those details were required to provide a sufficient legal foundation to get the exhibits into evidence. The second translator, Camille Ghorra, continues testifying this morning. Defense attorneys have not had a chance to cross- examine him to challenge any of his speaker identifications.

Al-Arian long has denied any connection to the Islamic Jihad. In his opening statement, defense attorney William Moffitt indicated Al-Arian left the organization after the internal feud. Al-Arian also suggested creating a nonpolitical, nonviolent branch, Moffitt said, and left when he could not make that happen.

Prosecutors also entered into evidence a series of telephone calls involving defendant Hatim Fariz and his brother, in addition to conversations with fellow defendant Ghassan Ballut. Many of those calls involve efforts to solicit donations, including conversations about securing receipts to gain donors' trust and financing the purchase of an ambulance in Palestine.

In a September 2002 call, Fariz tells Ballut he is worried about Shallah's well-being. ``It's been a month since he has appeared anywhere, not after the assassinations, not after the operations, not after everything,'' Fariz said.

Fariz does not name Shallah but refers to him as Abu Abdallah. Prosecutors say that is a reference to Shallah's oldest son, a pseudonym common among Muslim men. They also claim Fariz later called Shallah in Damascus, Syria, to check on his health.
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-12 More