Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg
Kamran Atif Kamran Atif Harkatul Mujahedeen Al-Aalmi Afghanistan/South Asia 20040520 Link
  Kamran Atif Harkat-ul Mujahideen al-Alami Afghanistan/South Asia 20040526 Link
  Kamran Atif Harkatul Mujahideen al-Aalmi Afghanistan-Pak-India 20051114 Link
Kamran Butt Kamran Butt Jamaat-e-Islami India-Pakistan 20020824  
  Kamran Butt Jaish-e-Mohammed India-Pakistan 20020824  
Kamran Mir Kamran Mir Jaish-e-Mohammed India-Pakistan 20020811  

The Grand Turk
They tried to overthrow Erdogan again. Who was preparing the coup this time?
2024-05-18
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Kamran Hasanov

[REGNUM] On May 15, media reports appeared about the prevention of a conspiracy in Turkey. The purpose of the conspiracy is declared to be the overthrow of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. But very few details of this event are known. So what really happened there?
I ran a quick internet search on Turkey, as well as looking through the Daily Mail, the New York Post, Breitbart, the Times of Israel, the Jerusalem Post’s breaking news feed., and Rudaw. I found nothing about a plot against the Erdogan government. While this does not mean nothing happened, Hurriyet became a government mouthpiece during the Gulen nonsense back in 2015 or so.
Link


India-Pakistan
Police arrest several lawyers protesting outside Lahore High Court
2024-05-09
[GEO.TV] Police arrested several lawyers as their protest at the GPO Chowk near Lahore High Court intensified on Wednesday.

The lawyers are demonstrating against the division of civil courts and terrorism cases against their colleagues.

The Lahore High Court Bar Association has denied conducting negotiations with the police.

On the other hand, lawyers have kicked out petitioners from the courtroom of Justice Anwar-ul-Haq Pannu.

Speaking with Geo News, Deputy Inspector General (DIG) Operations Faisal Kamran said the police will continue to show restraint, but will take action according to the law if there is a violation from the lawyers.

"The police are showing maximum patience and restraint," he said, adding that the police only used tear gas after lawyers pelted stones at them.

"One of our SHO and one constable has been injured," he said.

The DIG Operations said there are at least 2,000 personnel for the security of the high court.
Related:
Lahore: 2024-05-01 Rana Sanaullah appointed PM Shehbaz's adviser on political affairs
Lahore: 2024-04-24 Iranian president threatens Israel's annihilation if major attack occurs
Lahore: 2024-04-22 CJP seeks explanation over unnecessary use of public resources on govt officers' residences
Related:
Lahore High Court Bar Association: 2017-08-04 Lawyers barge into court, shout slogans against LHC chief
Lahore High Court Bar Association: 2017-05-23 Ruckus by lawyers
Lahore High Court Bar Association: 2017-05-21 Lawyers threaten countrywide movement if 'PM does not step down in 7 days'

Related:
Faisal Kamran 04/18/2021 Over 50 TLP members rounded up in Pindi
Faisal Kamran 03/15/2014 Suicide blast in Peshawar: Death toll rises to 11

Link


The Grand Turk
Erdogan lost for the first time in 20 years. To preserve his legacy, he needs peace
2024-04-02
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Kamran Hasanov
More on this story from yesterday. The odds are high his legacy will not last beyond his lifetime, if that long.
[REGNUM] There have been many crises during Erdogan's administration. They tried to overthrow him twice. Once he lost in the city of which he was mayor. Nevertheless, the fourth and, probably, one of the most unpleasant blows could not be avoided.

The first time they tried to throw Erdogan over the Maidan was in 2013 due to the cutting down of trees in Gezi Park. The second time was in 2016 through a military coup. Everyone remembers his phrase: “Whoever controls Istanbul controls Turkey,” but in 2019 Erdogan lost in Istanbul - opposition candidate Ekrem Imamoglu was not stopped even by the second round, where he gained even more votes. However, having lost Istanbul in 2023, Erdogan still managed to win the presidential election.

On March 31, for the first time since 2002, Turkey's ruling Justice and Development Party lost regional elections. The opposition Republican People's Party not only received more votes throughout the country - 37% versus 35% for the AKP, but also won in key cities - Istanbul (accounting for a third of the country's GDP), Ankara (the capital), Izmir (the industrial center), Bursa (former capital of the Ottoman Empire) and Antalya (resort center).
They beat the margin of cheating in so many cities? Wow.
The defeat of Erdogan's party, on the one hand, is surprising.

After all, about a year ago, in the parliamentary elections, the government “People's Alliance”, the backbone of which is the AKP-MHP alliance, won a landslide victory, receiving 336 seats out of 600 mandates. Erdogan himself, albeit in the second round, defeated the opposition leader Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu .

Why is it that, a year later, the results of the party in power are so different, and why is the opposition gaining the upper hand?

There are two explanations here.

The first factor is subjective. As we remember, last year the power-hungry Kılıçdaroğlu prevented the popular mayor of Istanbul Imamoglu from running as the main opposition candidate in the presidential elections. He also interfered with the no less popular mayor of Ankara, Mansur Yavas .

Each of the two candidates was toxic in their own way. Legal proceedings began against Imamoglu for insulting the Central Election Commission; Yavaş is a nationalist. Nevertheless, due to the absence of a bright candidate, Erdogan easily beat the opposition.

The same personal factor affected the results of the parliamentary elections.

Kılıçdaroğlu, as the head of the CHP party and the opposition National Alliance coalition, dragged his own people to the bottom in parliament.

In addition, the reputation of the opposition was affected by scandals. Three days before the elections, due to discrediting photos and videos on social networks, the chairman of the Fatherland Party, Muharrem Ince, withdrew his candidacy . In addition, a scandal broke out in the National Alliance due to the fact that the head of the Good Party, Meral Akşener, refused to support Kılıçdaroğlu, considering the candidacies of Imamoglu and Yavaş more successful.

On the other hand, the parallel holding of presidential elections helped Erdogan get additional votes for his coalition.

The objective factor in the defeat of the AKP is the economy.

Immediately after his victory last year, Erdogan began to move closer to the West and implement the IMF's recommendations to raise the key rate. For the first time since 2021, inflation in Turkey has slowed, but remains at a very high level of 85%. Turkish Finance Minister Nureddin Nebati stated that the peak of inflation has passed and the country is moving downward. GDP also looks decent, growing by 4.5% in 2023. The unemployment rate fell to its lowest level (9.4%) over the past 10 years.

Yet, despite relative progress, the economic crisis dealt a serious blow to the well-being of citizens.

Everything is becoming more expensive: food, cars and apartments. Many Turks go abroad not because there is no work, but because they can earn much more abroad.

If the economy is the main problem, then a number of other minor issues could also play against the authorities. The fate of almost 5 million refugees, mainly from Syria, has not been decided. Migrants dump and create social conflicts. Neutral voters may also be annoyed by the strengthening of the vertical power structure, the arrests of opposition politicians and journalists, as well as the 20-year tenure of the same person in power.

If last year's elections, in which Erdogan barely retained his post in the second round, and the municipal elections of 2019, when he lost Istanbul, were a wake-up call, then yesterday's vote is a ringing alarm bell.

This time the bell is ringing for both Erdogan and his party.

There is still a lot of time until 2028. But if nothing changes, the president's heir could miserably lose the next presidential election, and the AKP-led alliance could lose parliament. Inspired by the victory, the opposition already wants early presidential elections, but presidential adviser Mehmet Uçum rejected such an idea.

Erdogan will not participate in the next elections. He has already announced that the current elections will be his last.

However, as a leader who built not only a new system, but also a new country, he must take care to preserve his legacy. After admitting defeat, Erdogan promised to “objectively and self-critically” analyze the message conveyed by citizens who cast ballots in the ballot boxes. The president committed himself and his administration to “work tirelessly” to improve the welfare and safety of the population and rebuild the earthquake-damaged regions. Presidential aide Uchum made it clear that the authorities will spend the next four years implementing reforms.

Erdogan has not yet decided on a successor.
How can he? The minute he makes his choice known, even privately, that man will start plotting against him, or he will fear that the man plots. It’s the Byzantine and the Ottoman way,
They call different names. Some talk about the experienced Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan , others about the successful businessman and UAV manufacturer Seljuk Bayraktar . The role of the individual will be of fundamental importance. But charisma alone won't get you far.

In 2028, Turks will judge the AKP candidate and the party itself by deeds. Time will tell whether the Turkish authorities will cope with the economy and migrants.

In principle, municipal elections should not affect foreign policy.

In 2019, Republicans became mayors of Istanbul and Ankara, but international policy was strictly subject to the will of the president. Erdogan carried out Operation Peace Spring in Syria, fought against Assad’s troops in Idlib in 2020, and at the same time helped the al-Sarraj government in Libya fight off General Haftar. At the same time, as we remember, against the backdrop of the peak of the economic crisis, aggravated by the earthquake, Erdogan softened towards the EU and the United States and approved Sweden’s membership in NATO.

To further improve the investment climate, Erdogan will have to continue to take measures to improve relations with the West. At the same time, he will take active steps to diversify trade and financial ties in favor of the east.

It is not for nothing that Turkey and the Cooperation Council of the Arab States of the Persian Gulf recently began negotiations on a free trade zone. Russia remains a key and energy partner for Turkey, so rapprochement with the West will not come at the expense of joint projects with Moscow, even if the risk of tertiary sanctions becomes real.

The ideal geopolitical scenario for Erdogan is normal relations with both Russia and the West. To skillfully play on both boards, Turkey needs to reduce the degree of confrontation between Moscow and Washington.

Therefore, in the coming years, Erdogan will continue efforts to resolve or at least freeze the conflict in Ukraine. A possible change of administration in the White House this fall could become a “tailwind” for him.
The Times of Israel is more interested in statistics:
With more than 90% of ballot boxes counted, incumbent Istanbul Mayor Ekrem Imamoglu, of the Republican People’s Party, or CHP, was leading by a wide margin in The Sick Man of Europe Turkey
...just another cheapjack Moslem dictatorship, brought to you by the Moslem Brüderbund...
’s largest city and economic hub, according to the state-run Anadolu Agency. Mansur Yavas, the mayor of the capital, Ankara, retained his seat with a stunning 25-point difference over his challenger, the results indicated.

In all, the CHP won the municipalities of 36 of Turkey’s 81 provinces, according to Anadolu, making inroads into many strongholds of Erdogan’s party. It gained 37% of the votes nationwide, compared to 36% for the president’s party, marking the CHP’s greatest electoral victory since Erdogan came to power two decades ago.

Sinan Ulgen, director of the Istanbul-based Edam think tank, said "the surprising outcome" was due to voters wanting to punish the ruling party over the "depth of an economic malaise." Skyrocketing inflation has left many Ottoman Turkish households struggling to afford basic goods.

AKP supporters opted to stay away from the ballot stations or voted for other parties, Ulgen said.

"Turnout was relatively low compared to past elections," he said. "There were cross-party shifts in the vote, which did not happen in the nationals elections because of stronger ideological attachments. This time around the economy prevailed over identity."

Some 61 million people, including more than a million first-time voters, were eligible to cast ballots for all metropolitan municipalities, town and district mayorships as well as neighborhood administrations.

Turnout was around 76%, according to the state-run Anadolu Agency, compared to 87% last year.

Some 594,000 security personnel were on duty across the country to ensure the vote goes smoothly. Nevertheless, one person was killed and 11 others hurt in the city of Diyarbakir where a dispute over the election of a neighborhood administrator turned violent mostly peaceful, the state-run Anadolu Agency reported. At least six people were also injured in fighting that erupted in the nearby province of Sanliurfa.


Analysts said a strong showing for Erdogan’s party would have hardened his resolve to usher in a new constitution — one that would reflect his conservative values and allow him to rule beyond 2028 when his current term ends.

Erdogan, who has presided over Turkey for more than two decades — as prime minister since 2003 and president since 2014 — has been advocating for a new constitution that would put family values at the forefront.

Link


International-UN-NGOs
Desire for revenge: NATO and the EU want to push Russia out of the South Caucasus
2024-03-22
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Kamran Hasanov

[REGNUM] In the context of confrontation between the West and Russia, the visit of major Western figures to the countries of the post-Soviet space is of great interest. As long as the conflict in Ukraine continues, the United States and its allies will try to fill the vacuum in Russia’s traditional areas of interest.

After the start of the CWO, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken was already touring the countries of Central Asia, trying to turn them against Russia and asking them to join anti-Russian sanctions. Last year, French President Emmanuel Macron came to Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan with the same initiatives. However, neither one nor the other was able to achieve their goals.

The next visitor was NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, who made a tour to Azerbaijan, Georgia and Armenia on March 17–19.

WHY SOUTH CAUCASUS
One of the goals of such trips is to compensate for the exclusion of Western and NATO states from developing countries. Against the backdrop of the transformation of the international system towards greater multipolarity, France is being squeezed out of Africa, and the United States is being squeezed in the Middle East. Therefore, they need new partners to pump out minerals, uranium, gas and oil.

Central Asia remains a tasty morsel, but inaccessible to the West. The majority of countries in the region are in a military and economic alliance with Russia and do not intend to leave the CSTO and the EAEU. Turkmenistan is neutral, but does not fit into the Western model for political reasons. Uzbekistan is pursuing a multi-vector policy.

Meeting of the CSTO Collective Security Council in Yerevan. 2022
An additional headache is created here by China with its powerful trade and investment presence, and the West faces competition with Beijing in a whole range of areas.

Since the 90s, the Baltic states have moved into the orbit of influence of NATO and the United States; in Ukraine, the West established its protectorate since Euromaidan. In Belarus, the Maidan scenario failed in 2020, and after the start of the Northern Military District, Minsk became completely hostile to the West. Of the post-Soviet regions, only the South Caucasus remains.

Competition here is still high, but there are opportunities to expand influence and promote Western interests. That is why the NATO Secretary General honored the region with his attention.

AZERBAIJANI CAUTION
Of the three countries, NATO has the least chance in Azerbaijan, and that is why Stoltenberg stayed here for almost two days. Over the past year, Baku's relations with the West have deteriorated sharply. And this happened not only because of the pro-Armenian position of France, the visits of French politicians to Yerevan and the anti-Azerbaijani resolutions of the Senate.

At the end of last year, the State Department also distinguished itself by threatening to freeze summit meetings due to Azerbaijan’s taking full control of Nagorno-Karabakh and the exodus of Armenians from the region, which the US leadership called “ethnic cleansing.” The resolutions of the European Parliament and the suspension of Azerbaijan’s membership in PACE due to the same exodus of Armenians, as well as the presidential elections and the victory of Ilham Aliyev, added fuel to the fire.

The actions of European and American officials in Azerbaijan are considered in the context of general relations with the West. Therefore, Stoltenberg, as a representative of the Western military alliance, needed to normalize ties with Baku. At the meeting with Aliyev, he did not skimp on compliments. He thanked Azerbaijan for its participation in peacekeeping missions in Kosovo and Afghanistan, recalling that the Azerbaijani military was the last to leave Kabul airport.

He also pointed to Azerbaijan's contribution to European energy security, referring to gas supplies through the TANAP and TAP pipelines. In his speech, Stoltenberg went so far as to thank Baku even for the “necessary support for Ukraine” - Baku supplied humanitarian aid to Kiev.

Although the West has pretty much frayed the nerves of the Azerbaijani leadership, Baku is not going to break with it. Energy is too important for the republic's economy. In addition, Azerbaijan has a military alliance with NATO Turkey, which also normalized relations with Euro-American partners in the last year.

Aliyev showed solidarity with Stoltenberg on all topics - from energy to peacekeeping, but did not emphasize the topic of Ukraine in the context in which the NATO Secretary General, who accused Russia of “military aggression,” wanted it.

Since 2022, Azerbaijan has an allied status of relations with Russia. Moscow remains an important economic partner of Baku. And this reality was again confirmed during Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin’s recent visit to the Azerbaijani capital, where the parties agreed to expand economic projects.

GEORGIAN PRAGMATISM
In Georgia the situation is somewhat different. Since the time of Mikheil Saakashvili and especially after the war in South Ossetia, Tbilisi has made NATO membership a foreign policy priority.

Although, under the rule of the Georgian Dream, the country has taken a pragmatic course towards Russia and has recently achieved the opening of air traffic and the removal of visas from Russia for Georgian citizens, its position on Euro-Atlantic integration remains unchanged.

Georgia is waiting to join the European Union, offended that it was not given candidate status for a long time, and Brussels has already launched accession negotiations with Moldova and Ukraine. Foreign Minister Ilya Darchiashvili recalled that joining NATO remains “the cornerstone of the country’s foreign policy.”

The similarity between Georgia and Azerbaijan for NATO is that both countries do not join anti-Russian sanctions and do not adequately support Ukraine. Relations with both Baku and Tbilisi have deteriorated in recent years. With Baku - because of Karabakh and Armenia, with Tbilisi - because of the Northern Military District and sanctions.

But Stoltenberg wants to improve ties with each of the republics. There are more chances with Georgia, since there remains a territorial dispute between it and Russia in Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

Granting EU candidate status should make NATO's task easier. And it was no coincidence that Stoltenberg said that candidate status “will strengthen the aspirations for prosperity and the spirit in this direction in the country, we will go side by side in the direction of NATO.”

In fact, he confirmed that integration with the EU and NATO are synchronous things. The only difficulty is that the Secretary General cannot outline clear prospects and name dates for joining the North Atlantic Alliance, which is what the members of the Georgian Dream expected from him.

Stoltenberg recalled the reforms that both Charles Michel and Ursula von der Leyen spoke about during their visits to Tbilisi. Part of these reforms is coordination with the EU and NATO on foreign policy issues, read - the adoption of anti-Russian decisions on sanctions and Ukraine.

ARMENIAN NEW COURSE
The greatest intrigue is created by Stoltenberg’s visit to Armenia.

If Azerbaijan is closely connected with the NATO country Turkey, and Georgia directly speaks of its desire to join there, then Armenia is a member of the CSTO. For Moscow, the appearance of the chairman of a hostile organization in a country where a Russian military base is located is not just a challenge, but a threat to its geopolitical interests.

Brussels understands this and that is why they are taking steps in this direction. They also understand that the current visit of the NATO Secretary General - the second since 2020 - lies on fertile soil.

Just on the eve of Stoltenberg’s trip, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan questioned his country’s continued presence in the CSTO, first announcing a freeze of membership, and then completely allowing exit from the bloc.

The very fact of Pashinyan’s arrival as a result of the “velvet revolution” already sowed doubts about further partnership with Russia, but for a long time Yerevan masked its Western aspirations.

The masks were dropped after 2020 and the subsequent events: aggravations on the border of Azerbaijan and Armenia, Baku’s establishment of control over the Lachin corridor, and most importantly, Aliyev’s counter-terrorism operation in Karabakh.

Pashinyan blamed all these troubles on the Armenians on the CSTO, which did not come to the aid of his country. Pashinyan began to take steps towards rapprochement with the West. Invited EU observers to the border with Azerbaijan, joined the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which issued an arrest warrant for Vladimir Putin, sent his wife to Kiev and declared that Armenia is not an ally of Russia in Ukraine.

After the Russian Foreign Ministry issued a note of protest to the Armenian ambassador for the first time in the history of bilateral relations, the chances of the United States, France and NATO for rapprochement with Armenia increased sharply. Armenia’s entry into the Alliance is still a long way off, and Yerevan prefers not to talk about it officially, but steps are being taken in this direction. If Pashinyan is ready to integrate with the EU to the extent that the Union wants, the same principles can work with NATO.

At talks with Stoltenberg, Pashinyan said that his country was “interested in continuing to develop political dialogue with NATO and expanding partnerships both with NATO and with individual member countries.” In addition, the Armenian prime minister counts on NATO as a guarantor of security and tells Stoltenberg about the importance of “strengthening the level of resistance and developing appropriate defensive potential.”

What is this if not an invitation to the NATO army to guard the Zvartnots airport, from where Russian border guards are being expelled, and in the future, quartering in Gyumri, where the Russian 102nd military base is located?

If the presence of the Russian military in Gyumri is a deterrent for NATO, then the political transformations in Armenia are working in favor of strengthening the partnership. Stoltenberg supported Pashinyan's commitment to democracy. The Secretary General did not speak out loud about NATO prospects, but the words “NATO promotes the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Armenia” provide food for thought.

And it seems that Stoltenberg is preparing the ground for sending NATO troops to the Transcaucasian republic, which doubts security guarantees from Russia, but hopes for help from NATO France. Moscow’s relations with Paris are worsening in light of Emmanuel Macron’s statements about his readiness to send an army to Ukraine, and France may act as a conductor of NATO interests in Armenia.

By the way, regarding Ukraine, according to Stoltenberg, Armenia and NATO also have common principles. “I welcome the solidarity of Armenia with Ukraine,” he said. And here, according to NATO estimates, Armenia is not on Russia’s side.

VICTORY IN UKRAINE WILL DECIDE EVERYTHING
To summarize, we can say that Stoltenberg was partly able to level out the West’s shaken relations with Azerbaijan and Georgia and contributed his own brick to the foundation of the process of squeezing Russia out of Armenia. Whether the NATO Secretary General's visit will be successful in the long run depends on several factors.

In the case of Baku, we can say with confidence that improving ties will not undermine Russia’s position. Azerbaijan does not strive either to join NATO - and Stoltenberg openly said this, or to the EU - Aliyev spoke about this recently. Azerbaijan will continue its multi-vector policy in its national interests, cooperating with both the EU and the USA, as well as Russia and Turkey.

In Georgia, NATO will not achieve serious changes until the government changes. In Armenia, the potential for deepening ties is much greater due to the policies pursued by the Pashinyan government. But, as in the case of Georgia and Armenia, NATO's success depends on what results Russia achieves in Ukraine.

For the West, the ideal option is the defeat of Russia, which will increase the chances of squeezing it out of the South Caucasus. A Russian victory could reverse the relative successes of the West not only in Georgia, but also in Armenia. And the prolongation of the Ukrainian conflict will preserve a scenario in which NATO will continue to impose a fight on Moscow in the region.

Link


The Grand Turk
Heir to Erdogan. Who will replace the leader of Turkey, who celebrated his 70th birthday?
2024-02-27
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Kamran Hasanov

On February 26, 2024, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan celebrated his anniversary. He is 70 years old. Erdogan received his first serious political position in 1994, when he became mayor of Istanbul. At that time he said: “Whoever takes Istanbul will take all of Turkey!” The words turned out to be prophetic.
Link


Europe
'Anti-Semites' and 'agent of the Kremlin' are preparing to stir up the German parliament
2024-02-26
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Kamran Hasanov

[REGNUM] Germany, suffering from an economic crisis, is also experiencing a political crisis. Its beginnings were observed back in 2017, when the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party burst into the Bundestag, taking away points from the ruling SPD and CDU. Then Chancellor Angela Merkel needed five months to put together a coalition. This was the longest government formation in the history of Germany.

Now the crisis has become even more pronounced. Society is becoming increasingly polarized; traditional parties do not fully reflect the opinions and interests of voters. Some echoes of this crisis can be seen in local elections.

For example, Olaf Scholz’s “traffic light coalition” lost the elections in Hesse and Bavaria miserably last year. The stakes are higher now because parliamentary elections are approaching. Moreover, the majority of citizens (59%), according to Bild polls, want them to be held ahead of schedule - this year.

Oddly enough, it would even be beneficial for Scholz, with his record low rating, to agree to early elections. After all, every day he loses, perhaps, the only trump card of any politician in Germany - success in the economy. Finance Minister Christian Lindner said bluntly: “We are becoming poorer and less competitive.”

His skepticism is confirmed by statistics. The OECD cut its forecast for GDP growth this year by half - from 0.6% to 0.3%, and the IMF - from 0.9% to 0.5%. German media are hinting at an imminent recession; of the major economies, only Argentina, with its crazy inflation, is doing worse.

In 2025, Scholz may lose his second trump card - Ukraine. The counteroffensive has failed, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are surrendering territories, and the EU is having problems with the allocation of funding and weapons. The Chancellor is trying to get other member countries to increase spending, but no one is in a hurry to do this. Scholz had difficulty accepting the responsibility of arming Ukraine, starting with helmets and ending with tanks. Now he was left virtually alone. Further support for Kyiv may turn out to be not only pointless, but also dangerous.

Recently, the Bundestag out of harm's way blocked the CDU/CSU proposal to transfer Taurus missiles capable of hitting targets at a distance of up to 500 km. Everyone understands that strikes deep into Russia could lead Germany to war.

In the wake of the economic crisis and the failure of the Ukrainian “case,” new parties began to form in Germany. In the past three months, it became known about the emergence of at least three major players. The pioneer was Sarah Wagenknecht : having split off with ten politicians from the Left faction, she formed the party “For Sanity and Justice”.

Its supporters could be millions of Germans who oppose the transfer of weapons to Ukraine, anti-Russian sanctions and the “green concentration camp” where Scholz wants to drive the energy sector. Immediately after the creation of the party, its rating was 7% - this is enough to enter parliament.

Wagenknecht was a consistent supporter of normal relations with Russia and criticized sanctions. And now she warns against dragging Germany into a direct war, which, in her opinion, is inevitable in the case of Taurus deliveries.

At the beginning of the year, the former head of the Federal Service for the Protection of the Constitution, Hans-Georg Maasen, made his presence felt by creating his own “Union for Values.” Maasen is a former head of counterintelligence who was fired from his post in scandal in 2018. Then, in the city of Chemnitz, a refugee killed a German citizen, and Maasen was dismissed for his sympathy for right-wing extremists. Now he has gathered in his new party the dissatisfied from among the “Merkel” faction of the CDU/CSU, who are haunted by the same economic crisis and the war in Ukraine.

Although Maasen condemns the SVO, he also wants peace through negotiations, and considers Vladimir Putin a “skillful politician.” The former head of counterintelligence has long been among the most active critics of the transfer of German weapons and missiles to Ukraine.

“If we deliver weapons rather than first aid kits, we obviously risk becoming participants in the war. You have to imagine this: we are now a warring party against Russia... Because of the supply of weapons, we can now become the target of Russian attacks. This means that Germany will be drawn into the war, and we will not have our own military goals,” he warned a year ago.

Maasen considers his former colleagues insufficiently right-wing and conservative and hopes to win elections in the eastern states, where the AfD’s position is traditionally strong. Sarah Wagenknecht, who, by the way, like Maasen, opposes uncontrolled migration, also wants to achieve victory in the Landtags (local parliaments) of the three East German states in the near future.

The third challenge to the German political mainstream was Dava.
…we call it dawa, literally outreach. But jihadis and other traditionalists mean it as an offer to peaceably convert rather than be conquered.
In Arabic, the word means "converting non-Muslims to Islam." But the party’s leaders do not pursue such a goal, and its electoral base is Muslims and Germans with a migration background, mainly Turks. The group's leaders, ethnic Turks Mustafa Yoldas, Fatih Zingal and Ihsan Unlu, are well-known representatives of the Turkish-Muslim community in Germany.
It sounds like Dava is, or wants to be, the Muslim Brotherhood of Germany.
Most German media accuse Dava and their leaders of having ties to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, calling the party the German wing of Erdogan's Justice and Development Party.
…which considers itself the Muslim Brotherhood of Turkey, even though they aren’t Arabs.
The heads of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Brandenburg and Bavaria want to ban it altogether.
That would be prudent, yes.
Besides “Erdogan’s party,” Dava’s second “nickname” is “Turkish AfD.” Like the Alternative for Germany, it is accused of extremist methods and views, anti-Semitism and a desire to “undermine democracy.” The alarm in the media and among legislators of traditional parties says a lot about Dava's prospects. For now, she aims to get into the European Parliament after the 2024 elections, but in the future, participation in voting in the elections to the Bundestag cannot be ruled out.

The three new parties differ in their ideology and programs, but they are united by the degree of hatred that “traditional” political forces feel towards them. The Maas party is accused of right-wing extremism, Wagenknecht of working for the Kremlin, and Dava of anti-Semitism.
Don’t be silly. I’m sure Dava is anti-Christian and anti-atheist as well.
But each of these newcomers has a chance to enter the Bundestag next year.

In certain cases, we can talk about the prospects for a coalition of new forces. It is difficult to imagine an alliance between the “migration” Dava and the anti-migration Wagenknecht and Maasen. However, a coalition of the latter two is quite possible precisely on the basis of control over migration and unity of views on freezing the Ukrainian conflict.

Theoretically, AfD could also join them. It will be easy for them to find a common language with the former head of counterintelligence Maasen, and with the Wagenknecht party, according to AfD co-chairman Tino Hrupalla, they are also ready for coordination and cooperation.
Related:
Alternative for Germany: 2024-02-03 Ukrainian Perspective: Invasion of Ukraine: February 2, 2024
Alternative for Germany: 2024-01-31 Germany’s AfD sets up talks with France’s Le Pen to clarify immigrant expulsion spat
Alternative for Germany: 2024-01-29 Germany’s far-right AfD party suffers regional electoral defeat after mass protests
Related:
Hans-Georg Maasen: 2015-11-28 German official says some migrants IS radicals
Link


India-Pakistan
Senate throws out bill seeking public hanging of rape convicts
2024-02-20
[GEO.TV] Senate rejected a bill seeking to publicly execute those convicted of rape with a majority vote on Monday, with parliamentarians strongly opposing the idea as a "counter-effective measure in deterring sexual crimes".

The upper house of parliament rejected the move to amend the Pakistain Penal Code,1860, and Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, through the Criminal Laws (Amendment) Bill 2023 with a 24:14 vote.

The bill presented by Jamaat-e-Islami
...The Islamic Society, founded in 1941 in Lahore by Maulana Sayyid Abul Ala Maududi, aka The Great Apostosizer. The Jamaat opposed the independence of Bangladesh but has operated an independent branch there since 1975. It maintains close ties with international Mohammedan groups such as the Moslem Brotherhood. the Taliban, and al-Qaeda. The Jamaat's objectives are the establishment of a pure Islamic state, governed by Sharia law. It is distinguished by its xenophobia, and its opposition to Westernization, capitalism, socialism, secularism, and liberalist social mores...
’s (JI) Senator Mushtaq Ahmed was supported by Senators Mehr Taj Roghani, Kamran Murtaza, Maulana Faiz Muhammad, Hafiz Abdul Kareem, Kamal Ali Agha, Abdul Qadir, and others.

The senators who had voted against the bill called for improved prosecutions, investigations for combating sexual crimes, and a better jail environment to ensure that such heinous crimes are averted in the future.

Defending his proposal after it had been defeated, JI’s Mushtaq said the senators did not talk about the "basic issue" and noted that the politicians spoke about "brutality" becoming rife due to public executions, but it’s already rife.

"I want to halt brutality through public executions. Did the motorway rape case woman and Zainab have no respect? [How] does a rapist have respect?" he wondered, claiming that publicly hanging such criminals would act as a "deterrence".

Jamaat Ulema-e-Islam
...the political wing of the Pak Taliban...
-Fazl’s (JUI-F) Faiz Muhammad, backing Mushtaq, said that culprits who commit such heinous crimes should be hanged publicly.

Voicing concerns, Pakistain Peoples Party’s (PPP) Senator Sherry Rehman strongly opposed the proposal, calling it a counter-effective measure in deterring sexual crimes, and urged improved prosecutions and investigations to address the matter.

Speaking during the session of the Senate, she said: "The Peoples Party has always had a principled stance against the death penalty
, whether public or private."

"While the PPP staunchly condemns rape as a heinous and grave crime, calling for the death penalty or public executions, as seen in various countries, have not proven to be effective in deterring sexual crimes. We must prioritise enhancing prosecutions and investigations rather than resorting to barbarism and violence within society."

Link


The Grand Turk
Visit to Erdogan: what will Putin be offered in Ankara
2024-02-07
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Kamran Hasanov

[REGNUM] Vladimir Putin's visit to Turkey, planned for February, became one of the key events in international politics even before it began.

Until recently, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan was hardly behind Alexander Lukashenko in the frequency of meetings with the Russian leader. This is despite the fact that Turkey is a NATO country, and Belarus is in a military-political and economic union with Russia.

After the start of the SVO, the Turkish leader began to lag behind “Batka”. The reasons are clear. On the one hand, in wartime conditions the already high security requirements increased by an order of magnitude. On the other hand, it is not easy for Ankara to choose between the West and Ukraine on the one hand and Russia on the other.

But what still unites Erdogan and Lukashenko is that it was Minsk and Istanbul that became the first platforms for attempts to resolve the Ukrainian crisis.

Despite his difficult situation related to NATO membership and economic dependence on the West, Recep Erdogan found opportunities to meet with the Russian president.

Last September he himself came to Sochi.

Then he was unable to agree on the “grain deal”; mediation on Ukraine was also frozen due to the hype around the “counter-offensive”. But decisions were made on the gas hub and alternatives to the “grain deal” were discussed. And joint projects in trade and energy not only remained intact, but also increased in volume. Trade turnover amounted to over $60 billion, and the prospect of construction by Russian forces of another Turkish nuclear power plant in Sinop loomed ahead.

Even if Turkey tries to adhere to “multi-vector”, relations between our countries are often influenced by the totality of events and their context.

We remember the tense negotiations on Syria in March 2020, when the “Crossing the Balkans” figurine flaunted behind the presidents’ backs, reminiscent of the defeat of the Ottoman Empire, the memory of which is sacred to Erdogan. One can also recall the lateness of one or the other president to negotiations. There were also funny moments - probably the most memorable was how Putin treated his colleague to ice cream at the MAKS-2019 air show.

The specificity of our countries is that they both have historical and geopolitical ambitions in the adjacent regions of the Caucasus, Balkans, Middle East, Mediterranean and Black Sea. This alone can cause conflicts, which countries have felt most clearly in Syria. And on top of these ambitions is another important variable—Turkey’s relations with its NATO partners.

As during the Sochi meeting, the Western factor can bring some negativity. Two months before Sochi, Erdogan gave the go-ahead for Sweden to join NATO, lobbied for Ukraine to join NATO and extradited to the latter militants of Azov, which is banned in Russia (an organization whose activities are banned in the Russian Federation).

This time, “gifts” also arrived from the Turkish side.

Turkey's ruling party ratified Sweden's entry into NATO, and a certain rapprochement with the West immediately emerged. Last week, the EU took two steps forward - it invited Turkey to the transport corridor from Central Asia and, at the level of foreign ministers, outlined its intention to improve relations with Ankara.

Dependent on Western investment and trade, Turkey needs normal relations with European and American political elites: they create a favorable investment climate. International rating agencies Standard & Poor's (S&P) and Moody's have upgraded Turkey's credit rating from stable to positive and expect inflation to slow from 65% to 45% by the end of the year.

The Americans are also giving positive signals, promising not today or tomorrow to hand over F-16 fighters and, under certain conditions, to return Turkey to the F-35 development program.

Positive relations with the EU and the US are certainly important for crisis-ridden Turkey. However, as practice has shown, the drift towards the West does not result in a “turn to the West”, and various “unpleasant things” turn out to be unable to upset the positive balance between Dolmabahce and the Kremlin.

At the Sochi meeting, the two leaders, according to Russian Presidential Press Secretary Dmitry Peskov, did not even discuss the “sensitive topic” of the transfer of Ukrainian militants to Kiev. The presidents focused on positive topics such as nuclear power plants, gas pipes and the supply of 1 million tons of grain to be milled in Turkey and sent from there to poor countries in Africa. On the controversial topic of the grain corridor, which is of great concern to Turkey, Erdogan even expressed an understanding of the reasons for Russia’s withdrawal from the deal.

The topics outlined at the last face-to-face meeting remain relevant today.

Erdogan will again try to raise the topic of the “grain deal”, seeking the implementation of at least an alternative plan for the export of Russian products with financing from Qatar. Specific details are possible regarding the construction of a new nuclear power plant in Sinop. On the issue of trade, it is important to develop mechanisms to overcome Western sanctions and establish mutual payments, including using rubles and liras.

Nowhere without geopolitics.

Putin and Erdogan will not ignore the topic of Armenia and Azerbaijan. Both Russia and Turkey want normalization on their borders and do not intend to let NATO in. The topic of the Middle East is also very relevant. Both Turkey and Russia support the creation of a Palestinian state and are alarmed by the expansion of hostilities involving the Houthis, Iran, the United States and Britain.

Ukraine remains the most important and interesting topic for Russia.

Erdogan, through the media, has already tested the ground several times for Ankara’s return to the mediation mission. Turkish journalists wrote about their leader's new proposal. And this is really more than rumors. A month ago, Erdogan himself offered Zelensky mediation, and after that he said that Putin intended to complete the special operation “as soon as possible.” Assistant to the Russian President Yuri Ushakov confirmed that Ukraine will become one of the main topics of negotiations.

Thus, we can say with confidence that the upcoming meeting of the presidents is not just a return guest visit, although any trip by Putin abroad, especially to a NATO country, is a sensation. Putin and Erdogan have a lot to discuss and decide.

Judging by how the West is putting pressure on Turkey and how poorly things are going for the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the theater of operations, the results of the negotiations are of great intrigue.

Erdogan will most likely cope with Western pressure.

Winking at Europe and the United States, he gets closer to their opponents. He recently met with his Iranian counterpart Ibrahim Raisi and agreed to fight terrorism, hinting at Kurdish separatism. Contacts with the Gulf countries are being actively promoted. There are even hints of recognition of Bashar al-Assad in Syria.

But with the mediation mission everything is much more complicated.

The Turkish leader's desire alone is not enough. The West does not stop stuffing Ukraine with weapons and is moving on a “war footing.” Nevertheless, in any case, Erdogan will present the meeting with Putin as a new step in Turkey’s efforts to end the war. Moscow, even if it does not have illusions about a settlement, still considers Turkey’s actions useful. It is no coincidence that Putin called the Istanbul negotiations a “breakthrough.”

Link


International-UN-NGOs
'Racism and Islamophobia'. Azerbaijan breaks off relations with PACE
2024-01-27
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Kamran Hasanov

[REGNUM] The Azerbaijani delegation suspended work in the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) due to disputes over its powers.
Link


Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
South Caucasus in 2023: Russia has regained its strategic initiative
2024-01-03
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Kamran Hasanov

[REGNUM] The past year turned out to be sensational for the South Caucasus. It would seem that after the 44-day Karabakh war in 2020 there was nothing to surprise. Until September, few people believed that after the deployment of Russian peacekeepers to Karabakh, the status quo could change.

However, Ilham Aliyev managed to surprise not only his neighbors, but the whole world.

AZERBAIJAN: PLUS KARABAKH, MINUS MULTI-VECTOR
The Azerbaijani leader finally decided to send troops into Karabakh and took full control of it.

Not only Baku, but also Yerevan surprised with its behavior. Armenian President Nikol Pashinyan did not enter into an armed conflict. Moreover, the authorities of the former Nagorno-Karabakh Republic announced self-liquidation.

There are very few examples in modern history of a country that lost its territory regaining it 30 years later. The only one that comes to mind is Sinai, taken by Israel from Egypt after the Six-Day War and returned in 1979 in exchange for Egyptian recognition of the Jewish state.

Part of Baku's success can be attributed to the determination of its leader, but geopolitical alignments played a significant role in it. Nikol Pashinyan’s administration has done everything to alienate Russia as far as possible.

The loudest anti-Russian steps of Yerevan took place precisely this year. The Prime Minister's wife Anna Hakobyan's trip to Kiev with promises to provide humanitarian assistance. Signing of the Rome Statute and joining the International Criminal Court, which issued an arrest warrant for Vladimir Putin. And finally, Armenian-American military exercises.

Such steps by a CSTO ally forced the Russian Foreign Ministry to hand over a note of protest to the Armenian ambassador for the first time in the history of relations. The sequence of the two events listed above should not cause surprise - first a note of protest, then Azerbaijan’s operation in Karabakh.

Victory was not easy for Aliyev. If previously Azerbaijan traditionally boasted of the multi-vector nature of its foreign policy, it has lost one vector. The United States, through its Deputy Secretary of State James O'Brien, made it clear that Washington is ending high-level contacts with Azerbaijan and suspending aid until it sees progress in negotiations with Armenia.

After Aliyev’s harsh reaction, the State Department backed down and sent that same O’Brien to Baku to normalize relations. But the Azerbaijani side still holds a grudge against America and is not going to hold peace negotiations with their Armenian colleagues in Washington.

THE EU REMAINS ON THE SIDELINES
Some European countries are equally, or perhaps more, unhappy about geopolitical changes in the South Caucasus. Especially France. During the presidential race, a number of French politicians, such as Valérie Pecres, visited both Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh.

In 2023, the mayor of Paris wanted to visit Karabakh at the head of a humanitarian aid convoy, but could not, since Azerbaijan had already taken control of the Lachin road.

France and Azerbaijan exchanged formal accusations, and the process culminated in the declaration of two employees of the French embassy in Baku as persona non grata.

The USA and France are no longer mediators for Aliyev. This is a blow to the prestige and influence of the entire NATO and partly the European Union in the region.

Since 2021, the European Union has seized the initiative in the Karabakh issue from Russia, Aliyev and Pashinyan periodically met in Brussels and discussed peace terms. But the deepening crisis in Azerbaijani-French relations and its emergence in Azerbaijani-American relations creates a window of opportunity for Moscow.

The “3+3” platform promoted by Russia has reached a new level. In November, a meeting was held with the participation of the foreign ministers of Russia, Iran, Turkey, Azerbaijan and Armenia.

At the end of the year, Putin gathered the leaders of the CIS countries in St. Petersburg and created the opportunity for a one-on-one meeting between Aliyev and Pashinyan.

Unlike the United States and the EU, which are trying to conduct negotiations exclusively on Euro-Atlantic platforms, Moscow advocates a regional solution to regional problems.

This approach pleases Iran, which fears isolation, and suits anti-Western Turkey and Azerbaijan, which is becoming one.

Pashinyan feels more comfortable in Brussels and Paris, but cannot negotiate with himself.

GEORGIA KEEPS TO ITSELF
Meetings in the 3+3 format are still ignored by Georgia, although it has normal relations with all other participants. The problem rests on formalities - the existence of territorial claims to South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

At the same time, Tbilisi manages to sail between Scylla and Charybdis. The government of Irakli Garibashvili took a bold step by not joining the anti-Russian sanctions. Georgia resumed flights with Russia; in response, Russia canceled visas for Georgian citizens.

From this point of view, it can be stated that Russian positions in Georgia have strengthened.

At the same time, Tbilisi does not abandon its course towards European integration, even receiving slaps in the face from its Western partners.

At every opportunity, as with the adoption of the law on foreign agents in March, demonstrations of thousands take to the streets of Tbilisi.

The EU constantly reminds Garibashvili about human rights and the release of ex-president Mikheil Saakashvili.

Georgian authorities are demanding clarification about US Agency for International Development (USAID) funding of unrest in the country, but it is extremely difficult to resist pressure from the US, NATO and the EU. Since you yourself have hooked yourself on the European bait, you have to reckon with the demands of Brussels.

Last year, Tbilisi was upset that Georgia was not given EU candidate status. This year, Brussels corrected itself and granted the desired status.

But the price is still the same - during a visit to the Georgian capital, the head of European diplomacy, Josep Borrell, explained that the EU expects anti-Russian steps from Georgia, condemnation of the “war in Ukraine” and joining the sanctions.

RUSSIA IS STRENGTHENING ITS POSITION
Is it possible to observe the formation of some kind of sustainable trend, taking into account all the above events in the South Caucasus? On the one hand, no. The struggle for the region has been and continues to be, and there are no winners yet.

The loser of the Second Karabakh War, squeezed out by Russia and Turkey, managed to take revenge, strengthening itself in Armenia and dragging the blanket of Armenian-Azerbaijani negotiations to Brussels.

Even if Washington and Paris are dissatisfied with something, neither Aliyev, nor even more so Pashinyan, refused to participate in European platforms. Aliyev recently opened an interconnector from Bulgaria to Serbia, through which Azerbaijani gas will flow. European authorities welcome the diversification of gas supplies and the reduction of Russia's role in providing Europe with energy resources.

Moscow increased its chances of mediation by holding the first meeting between Aliyev and Pashinyan after the September conflict. But to maintain this advantage, you need to increase your efforts.

As for Georgia, here the initiative also remained with Russia. The European Union gave candidate status to Tbilisi not for progress in reforms, but despite its pragmatic course towards Moscow.

A further tightening of Brussels’ positions over Ukraine and sanctions could lead to the loss of EU-oriented Georgia.

At the same time, the status of a candidate country may turn out to be a trap for Garibashvili. And Brussels will have more political and legal grounds to shake the authorities and strengthen the opposition.

In the future, extra-regional processes will continue to influence the South Caucasus. The main events, as before, are unfolding in Ukraine. And here the initiative belongs to Russia.

While the US and EU were thinking about how to help Israel clear out the Augean stables in Gaza and where to find money for financing and ammunition for Kyiv, Russia confidently went on the offensive and took Mar,inka.

If American President Joe Biden is greeted in Saudi Arabia and other Arab countries with hidden hatred, then Putin is greeted with fireworks and parades.

In a word, the stronger Russia is on other fronts, the easier it will be for it to push its agenda in the South Caucasus.

Link


The Grand Turk
'Against all odds.' Erdogan emerged victorious from all battles in 2023
2024-01-02
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Kamran Hasanov

[REGNUM] If we talk about the history of Turkey as a whole, then, probably, none of the events that happened in 2023 will compare with the fact that the country celebrated its 100th anniversary. This is a long time. Considering that the very preservation of the current borders was in doubt due to the Treaty of Sèvres , even supporters of Pan-Osmanism should be satisfied with 780 thousand square kilometers.

The outgoing year for Turkey was largely built around three pillars: presidential and parliamentary elections, the financial crisis and the stabilization of relations with the outside world.

RELATIONS WITH THE WEST ARE STABLE
Unlike previous ones, the 2023 elections have proven to be very difficult for President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his Justice and Development Party (AKP). After all, not only traditional oppositionists from the Republican People's Party (CHP), but also former comrades Ahmet Davutoglu and Ali Babacan spoke out against him in May .

In parliament, the AKP and its junior partner, the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP), were opposed by a coalition of six parties. But Erdogan survived, although victory was given to him only in the second round. The success of his party coalition was even more confident.

Erdogan's triumph was achieved against all odds. Despite the financial crisis, the fall of the lira and double-digit inflation. Despite the largest earthquake in the 21st century in the east, which claimed the lives of 30 thousand citizens. And, of course, despite foreign pressure.

Western media and politicians did not hide the fact that they wished the victory of the secular opposition, which would save the West from Erdogan’s constant blackmail on issues of migration and NATO expansion. What can I say, even Joe Biden, back in his election campaign, announced the goal of removing the Turkish president through elections.

Türkiye is too strong to ignore, much less isolate.

Having understood these realities, the West was forced to accept and recognize Erdogan’s victory. American credit institutions upgraded Turkey's rating, and the economy began to breathe again. Turkey's GDP looked quite decent due to export growth. Its rise in the third quarter accelerated to 5.9% and turned out to be better than forecast.

Partly, there is a role for the West in this.

After all, at the July NATO summit, Erdogan unexpectedly supported Sweden’s membership in NATO and even invited Ukraine there - even Biden and Olaf Scholz did not dare to do the latter .

Well-known journalist Seymour Hersh
...forever chasing the feeling of getting a prestigious award for whatever it was he got right that first time, except ever since he’s been neglecting the getting right part. But he hates America, which is all that matters for some people...
reported that Biden promised Turkey $11-13 billion “for Sweden.” The information is confidential, but what is known for sure is Biden’s agreement to transfer F-16 fighter jets to Ankara. However, both issues - the transfer of the F-16 and Sweden's entry into NATO - are still blocked by the American and Turkish parliaments.

For the sake of the economy, Erdogan made another concession to the globalists - he allowed his Central Bank to raise the key rate. As a result, inflation in the country fell from 80 percent to less than 40 percent.

RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA ON THE RISE
Turkey’s relations with Russia this year were as pragmatic as in all recent years. Trade turnover grew and reached a record $60 billion. The Akkuyu NPP project is being successfully implemented - the first reactor is already ready for launch.

On September 5, the long-awaited meeting between Vladimir Putin and Erdogan took place in Sochi - an important moment given that Putin has seen few foreign leaders in the past two years. Erdogan showed understanding and came to Russia himself.

A certain chill in relations appeared after the NATO summit. In addition, in addition to agreeing to expand the alliance, Turkey gave the “Azovites” to Ukraine (“Azov” is an organization whose activities are prohibited in the Russian Federation).

But joint projects - trade, a new nuclear power plant in Snopa, a gas hub, “synchronizing watches” in Transcaucasia and the Middle East - maintain a partnership level of relations.

True, Russia refused to extend the grain deal, which Erdogan strongly insisted on. But at the same time, in March, for the sake of his victory in the elections, Russia already extended the deal by 60 days.

Due to the focus on internal problems, post-earthquake recovery and efforts to rehabilitate the economy, Turkey had less and less energy for an active foreign policy this year.

If at the initial stage of the NWO it was Ankara that seized the initiative from everyone in mediation, now it has serious competitors.

The Saudis held their summit in Jeddah, Xi Jinping proposed a 12-point formula, and African countries, India and Brazil are coming forward with peace initiatives.

RELATIONS IN THE REGION ARE SUCCESSFUL
Where Erdogan's success is most convincing is in the Middle East.

This year, relations with the UAE and Saudi Arabia, which had been shaken due to the events in Syria and Libya, were finally restored. Immediately after winning the elections, Erdogan went to Abu Dhabi. UAE President Emir Mohammed bin Zayed warmly received his colleague and concluded a deal with him worth more than $50 billion. As part of that tour, the Turkish president visited Saudi Arabia, which contributed $5 billion to the Turkish Central Bank.

Relations with Egypt are also being restored. In November, amid events in Gaza, Erdoğan met again with President Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi . Erdogan’s relations with Egypt were even more strained than with the UAE and KSA, since the Turkish leader supported Al-Sisi’s direct opponents in the person of the Muslim Brotherhood (an organization whose activities are banned in the Russian Federation).

The attitude towards Hamas in the KSA, UAE and Egypt, although not as positive as that of Erdogan’s party, still the tragedy and death of thousands of Palestinians creates a kind of Muslim unity, which brings Turkey even closer to its former rivals.

The return to the “zero problems” policy with neighbors was also taking place on other fronts.

Erdogan recently visited Athens, the second visit by a Turkish president to Greece in 70 years. The two countries have been on the brink of war in recent years over disputed islands in the Aegean Sea, exploration in the Mediterranean and Cyprus. But the leaders found the strength to go to peace.

A certain positivity can be observed this year in relations with Iran. Tehran has softened its tone towards Ankara's ally Baku. Although at the beginning of 2023, there was a hint of conflict on Iran’s northern borders after an attack on the Azerbaijani embassy in Tehran.

Iran has come to terms with the defeat of Armenia and the complete transfer of control over Karabakh to Azerbaijan. Tehran and Baku agreed to create their own “Zangezur Corridor”. In October, a meeting was held in Tehran at the level of the foreign ministers of Iran, Turkey, Russia, Azerbaijan and Armenia. After the creation of the 3+3 format, fears of Iran's isolation in the region were dispelled.

Iran also did not like the fact that Turkey was restoring ties with Damascus through the mediation of Moscow. But there is progress here too.

In May, Moscow hosted the foreign ministers of four countries, including Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Abdollahian . Against the backdrop of the Gaza crisis, Turkey and Iran have become closer, as they are more active in supporting Hamas than others. However, Iranian President Ibrahim Raisi still canceled his visit to Ankara. According to rumors, due to its demands on the Turkish side to more actively support Palestine.

The resolution of the Karabakh issue contributes to the rapprochement between Turkey and Armenia. In June, Erdogan confirmed that he would continue efforts to normalize bilateral relations.

If it were not for the war in Gaza, there would not be a single country with which Turkey would not have found a common language this year. However, Erdogan could not look indifferently at the death of more than 20 thousand Palestinians in Gaza and the defeat of his ideological ally Hamas.

He canceled his visit to Israel, declared Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a war criminal and assembled an army of international lawyers to bring the leaders of the Jewish state to justice.
How’s that going?
Thus, based on the results of the past year, the economic crisis in Turkey has been partially brought under control. At the same time, Turkey needs to spend half of its GDP to eliminate the consequences of the earthquake and other natural disasters. Relations with the West have stabilized somewhat, with Russia they are progressing, and neighboring countries, with the exception of Israel, no longer sharpen their grudge against Erdogan.

The main domestic political result of the year is Erdogan’s confident retention of power.
Of course. All his possible rivals are in prison or fled, and his people aren’t having babies because who would want to in that totalitarian society he created?
Related:
Seymour Hersh : 2023-12-23 Journalist Hersh reveals new details about the Nord Stream explosion
Seymour Hersh : 2023-12-03 The version of the negotiations between Zaluzhny and Gerasimov called considered a conspiracy theory
Seymour Hersh : 2023-11-16 Arrest warrant for Assad considered a sign of French helplessness in Africa
Link


The Grand Turk
Erdogan turned the helm: will rapprochement with the EU lead to distance from Russia?
2023-12-09
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Kamran Hasanov

[REGNUM] On December 7, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan flew to Greece for talks with Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis . The visit is truly historic: this is the second visit of a Turkish leader to Greek soil in 70 years.
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-12 More