Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

Afghanistan
Security Forces Did Not Raid Zaeef’s House: MoI
2019-03-18
[ToloNews] Close aides to Mullah Abdul Salam Zaeef, a former ambassador of Taliban
...the Pashtun equivalent of men...
for Pakistain during their regime in Kabul, said that security forces surrounded and raided Zaeef's residence in Kabul on Saturday night and that the siege continued until Sunday afternoon.

All ways connecting to Zaeef's house were closed by security forces, Zaeef's aides said, adding that the security forces raided Zaeef's residence at around 9am Kabul time. In a short faceoff with Zaeef's security guards, the sources said, one of them was slightly injured.

"Police vehicles came and were patrolling in the area and they had surrounded Salam Zaeef's house," said Azizullah, a resident of the area.
"I saw military vehicles when in the area when I woke up in the morning," said Nek Mohammad, a resident of the area.

Meanwhile,
...back at the shootout, Butch clutched at his other leg......
Salam Zaeef said that he had just returned from Kandahar when he witnessed the incident around his house.

"We heard sounds and we wondered what has happened. They (security forces) were trying to come inside the house. But they were not allowed by them (his security forces). After that, I made calls. I called to security (agencies), to Mr. (former President Hamid) Karzai and asked him that what has happened," Zaeef told TOLOnews.

Zaeef, who has been engaged in the peace talks, was Taliban’s ambassador to Pakistain before the US invasion of Afghanistan. He attended Moscow talks on Afghan peace in February and also he attended the Doha talks.

"I am cooperating in the grinding of the peace processor. This is my demand and my ambition that peace should come to Afghanistan. I have not done anything against anyone. I have no idea about it. Anyone who is doing this should find the motivation behind it."

He was detained in Pakistain in the fall of 2001 and held until 2005 in the Guantanamo Bay detainment camp. The United Nations
...aka the Oyster Bay Chowder and Marching Society...
removed Zaeef from its list of holy warriors in July 2010.

Following the US invasion, Zaeef was forced to end his news conferences, seized by Pak authorities, and handed over to American operatives.

Zaeef was released from Guantanamo in the summer of 2005. He has started a normal life in Kabul and also continued his political activities.

Nusrat Rahimi, a front man for Ministry of Interior, said rejected the news on raiding Mullah Zaeef’s house.

H said the Kabul Garrison forces conducted an operation to arrest Mullah Tokhi, a wanted criminal and a land grabber, whose house is located close to that of Mullah Zaeef.

He said Mullah Tokhi was placed in durance vile
Drop the gat, Rocky, or you're a dead 'un!
in the operation and that a number of weapons were confiscated from his house.
Link


Afghanistan
Ex-Taliban leader slams Pakistan for Torkham issue
2016-06-17
[Khaama (Afghanistan)] The former top Taliban leader Mullah Abdul Salam Zaeef has slammed Pakistain for the deadly issued in Torkham, warning that Islamabad is responsible for those killed in the clash in the past three days.

Zaeef who served as Taliban’s ambassador to Pakistain has in the meantime called on the Afghans to unite in a bid to protect the national illusory sovereignty and interests.

He has criticized Pakistain for the misuse of the ongoing crisis in Afghanistan and said Pakistain would be responsible for each drop of spilled due to Torkham clash.

In the meantime, the observers believe Pakistain has raised the issue Torkham to deviate attention from the growing international pressure on Islamabad mainly due to supporting the Afghan holy warrior groups.

The observers are saying that Islamabad is fearing isolation due to the latest upheavals, mainly due to the killing of the Taliban group leader Mullah Akhtar Mansoor in Pak soil, restriction of military aid by US, and the conclusion of Chabahar port.

In the meantime, Pakistain claims that the construction of the gate would help improve situation in Afghanistan as well as Pakistain by scanning those commuting between the two countries.

However,
corruption finds a dozen alibis for its evil deeds...
Pakistain has been harshly criticized by the leaders of the former and the present government for allowing the Afghan holy warrior groups, specifically the Taliban and the notorious Haqqani terrorist network to use the Pak soil to plan and coordinate attacks in Afghanistan.

Link


Afghanistan
What Will Happen After Foreign Troops Leave Afghanistan?
2012-07-09
In the eleven years since the US invasion of Afghanistan, Gulalai Jabbar, 28, has become a graduate from Kabul University and is now working as a computer engineer in an Afghanistan's leading telecommunication company. But like the ten thousand or so other young Afghan professionals, Jabbar is also worried about the future of his country, especially after the planned withdrawal of ISAF forces. He fears a civil war may start in Afghanistan again.

The withdrawal of NATO
...the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. A collection of multinational and multilingual and multicultural armed forces, all of differing capabilities, working toward a common goal by pulling in different directions...
-led ISAF forces, the transfer of security responsibilities back to Afghanistan, and the process of peace talks with the Taliban are a concern to most Afghans these days. In 2014, it is expected that the ISAF forces will no longer remain in a combat role in Afghanistan, handing over security responsibilities to the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF).

About 65,000 people were killed in infighting between Mujahideen groups between 1992 and 1996 in Kabul alone
Afghan government officials and some security analysts believe the ANSF is capable of handling the country's security alone. But many in Kabul disagree. The city was ravaged by civil war between 1992 and 1996, and its inhabitants are left with many bad memories. About 65,000 people were killed in infighting between Mujahideen groups during that period in Kabul alone.

In March 2011, Afghanistan's Caped President Hamid Maybe I'll join the Taliban Karzai
... A former Baltimore restaurateur, now 12th and current President of Afghanistan, displacing the legitimate president Rabbani in December 2004. He was installed as the dominant political figure after the removal of the Taliban regime in late 2001 in a vain attempt to put a Pashtun face on the successor state to the Taliban. After the 2004 presidential election, he was declared president regardless of what the actual vote count was. He won a second, even more dubious, five-year-term after the 2009 presidential election. His grip on reality has been slipping steadily since around 2007, probably from heavy drug use...
announced the first phase of the transfer of security responsibilities, in which the provinces of Panjsher, Bamyan, and Kabul (excluding Surobi district), and four cities, Herat
...a venerable old Persian-speaking city in western Afghanistan, populated mostly by Tadjiks, which is why it's not as blood-soaked as areas controlled by Pashtuns...
(capital of Herat province), Lashkar Gah (capital of Helmand
...an Afghan province populated mostly by Pashtuns, adjacent to Injun country in Pak Balochistan...
province), Mazar Sharif (capital of Balkh) and Metharlam (capital of Laghman province) would be handed over to ANSF.

In the second phase announced on November 26, security responsibilities in the provinces of Balkh, Daikundi, Kabul, Takhar, Samangan and Nimroz, and cities including Jalalabad (in Nangarhar
The unfortunate Afghan province located adjacent to Mohmand, Kurram, and Khyber Agencies. The capital is Jalalabad. The province was the fief of Younus Khalis after the Soviets departed and one of his sons is the current provincial Taliban commander. Nangarhar is Haqqani country..
province), Ghazni (in Ghazni province), Maydan Shahr (in Wardak province), Fayabad (in Badakhshan province), Chaghcharan (in Ghowr province), Shibirghan (in Jawzjan province) and Qalay-e-Naw (in Badghis province) were to be transferred to the local forces.

"In the third phase, the ANSF will take full control of Uruzgan, Kapisa and Parwan provinces," presidential front man Aimal Faizai told news hounds on May 14.

Investors are cautious and many Afghan citizens are considering leaving the country by 2014 because of concerns that the security situation would worsen
La Belle France, the fifth largest contributor to NATO's ISAF forces with nearly 3,300 soldiers, will begin withdrawing its troops from Kapisa province this month (July) and complete it by the end of the year. "Considering ANSF's capabilities, there will be no security gap as the French troops leave. The Afghan forces are capable of filling the vacuum when the French troops start withdrawing from Kapisa," said General Zahir Azimi, the front man of the Afghan Ministry of Defence. According to the ministry, its forces will number more than 350,000 by 2015.

A section of tribal elders and analysts have welcomed the withdrawal. "Pashtun communities do not approve of foreign troops operating in districts, especially when it comes to conducting night raids, violating privacy and disrespecting women and elders. Such controversial raids have triggered popular anger that compelled Karzai to strain his relationship with Washington," said Abdul Hadi, a tribal elder from Helmand province. As a result, both countries signed a deal in April, putting Afghans in charge of night raids by US Special Forces.
 
"Afghan cops were once among the world's top armies, before they broke down into regional militias during the fierce civil war in the 1990s," said Shukria Barakzai, an Afghan woman parliamentarian. "But now, they're all set to protect and stabilize their country again." They are well equipped, trained and "capable of launching special operations against anti-peace elements in the country," said Barakzai, who headed the parliamentary Defence committee for two years.

But General (r) Abdul Wahid Taqat, a former communist-era intelligence chief and a security analyst, thinks differently. He believes that the US and Britannia would not withdraw their troops from Afghanistan in 2014 as announced, because they have geo-political and strategic interests in the region.

Taliban bully boyz are waiting to exploit an imminent withdrawal and believe that the Afghan cops are not capable of fulfilling their security responsibilities. According to newsreports, investors are cautious and many Afghan citizens are considering leaving the country by 2014 because of concerns that the security situation would worsen.

"The key challenge is cleansing the army of anti-western and religious sentiment," Taqat says, adding that the affiliations of soldiers and officers with the Taliban, anti-Soviet Mujahideen and notorious warlords might undermine the efforts for a unified army, and may lead to a civil war again.

Taliban have meanwhile announced a 2012 spring offensive codenamed Al Farouq. But they also sent a representative to Japan to participate in a peace conference. A few months ago, the Taliban reversed a long-held position and agreed to open an office in Qatar from which they could negotiate, but they stopped the talks over a delayed prisoner swap that would see the US release five bad turban leaders imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

It is pertinent to mention that Hizb-e-Islami, the second largest bad turban group, has also suspended formal peace talks, but in June, they sent a representative to an informal meeting in Gay Paree for talks with members of the three main opposition political parties in Afghanistan and several members of the High Peace Council (HPC).Taliban claimed that they did not attend this meeting.

"A research conference is being organised in Doshisha University of Japan that will discuss Afghanistan among other issues. The Islamic Emirate has also been invited to the conference," Taliban front man Zabiullah Mujahed said in a statement. Former Taliban minister Qari Din Mohammad Hanif will "explain the policies of the Islamic Emirate" in the conference, he said.

Affiliations of soldiers and officers with the Taliban, anti-Soviet Mujahideen and notorious warlords might undermine the efforts for a unified army
"Hanif, who belongs to Yaftali plain district in Badakhshan province, is an important member of Taliban's political committee and was the minister of planning and the minister for higher education under the Taliban regime," said Ahmed Wali Mujib, a veteran journalist. The meeting in Japan was attended by Hanif, Dr Ghairat Baheer (in charge of Hizb-e-Islami's political affairs), Mullah Abdul Salam Zaeef (former Taliban ambassador to Pakistain) and Masoom Stanekzai, representative of the HPC. Hanif travelled from Qatar to Tokyo to attend the meeting, according to news reports.

Even in Afghanistan, some analysts and parliamentarians want their government to make peace with Taliban despite their growing dislike for insurgency.

"Our doors are always open for 'good Afghans' for peace negotiations, but not for the foreigners -especially Arabs and Punjabis. We have closed our doors for those who don't belong to us, who don't approve of the constitution of the country, and don't respect the Afghan people," said Barakzai. "Those who do not want to see Afghanistan prosper, whether they are called Taliban or anything else, we will kill them or throw them out." She said peace negotiations should not come in the form of a deal. They were a process, she said, that should begin from the grassroots. Barakzai is confident the Taliban cannot take over again, and will only carry out hit-and-run attacks.

Some call the ongoing peace talks hypocrisy. "On the one hand, Karzai and the US say that they are fighting against 'brutal and barbarian Taliban', calling it a 'war on terror', and on the other hand they are negotiating with the Taliban and appeasing them," said Hafizullah Rasekh, a leader of Solidarity Party of Afghanistan. He said the current Afghan parliament was full of Taliban and Mujahideen leaders who had been involved in war crimes or inhumane killings of thousands of people.

"The president's policy has emboldened the bad turbans. He calls them 'brothers' and stopped the night raids by ISAF that were the only effective operational tactic against the bad turbans," Daily Outlook Afghanistan, a leading Kabul-based English newspaper, said in its June 23 editorial. It said the attack on Qargha lake in Kabul should put an end to myth that the Taliban would soften and a political settlement was possible with beturbanned goons who wanted to impose their primitive worldview on the Afghans.
Link


Afghanistan
Ex-Taliban denies reports of Qatar office
2011-12-16
[Dawn] An ex-Taliban envoy said on Thursday that he had no knowledge of plans by the Afghan cut-throats to set up a political office in Qatar, even though media reports billed him as a potential chief of a possible Taliban mission in the tiny Gulf state.

By opening an office, the Taliban would indicate a willingness to talk peace after 10 years of war in Afghanistan and signal their intention to try and find a political solution to an insurgency that has cost the lives of thousands.

Abdul Salam Zaeef, the Taliban's former ambassador to Pakistain, said he was unaware of such an office being planned. A top member of the Afghanistan peace council, ex-Taliban official Arsala Rahmani, said he was also unaware that such an office was about to open.

Their remarks follow reports in an Indian newspaper, The Hindu, quoting unnamed Indian diplomatic sources that said work was being finalized on a Taliban office in Qatar that Zaeef may run.
Link


India-Pakistan
'Pakistan Still Supports Militant Groups'
2011-07-05
[Tolo News] The Pak military still support and train Islamic exemplar groups to use them as proxies against its neighbours and US troops in Afghanistan, The New York Times
...which still proudly displays Walter Duranty's Pulitzer prize...
reports.

A prominent former Islamic exemplar commander has told The New York Times on condition of anonymity that he was supported by the Pak military for 15 years as a fighter and trainer of forces of Evil until he quit a few years ago.

The former commander told the Times that bad boy groups, including Lashkar-e-Tayeba, Harakat-ul-Mujahedeen and Hizbul Mujahedeen are run by religious leaders with Pak military providing training, protection and planning.

He said that system is still the same.

Still Pakistain's military and intelligence establishment has not abandoned its policy of supporting the Islamic exemplar groups as tools in Pakistain's dispute with India and in Afghanistan to drive out American and NATO
...the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Originally it was a mutual defense pact directed against an expansionist Soviet Union. In later years it evolved into a mechanism for picking the American pocket while criticizing the style of the American pants...
forces, he has said.

"There are two bodies running these affairs: mullahs and retired generals," he said. "These people have a very big role still."

After the fall of the Taliban regime in Afghanistan in 2001 there were about 60 people at the Taliban meeting, including Pak Islamic exemplar leaders, the Taliban ambassador to Pakistain, Abdul Salam Zaeef, and Muhammad Haqqani, a member of the Haqqani bad boy network.

At the meeting the Islamic exemplar groups divided Afghanistan into separate areas of operations and discussed how to "trip up America," he said.

The Pak military still supports the Afghan Taliban in their fight to force out American and NATO forces from Afghanistan, he said.

"The (Pak) government is not interested in eliminating them permanently," he said. "The Pak military establishment has become habituated to using proxies."

Referring to former al-Qaeda leader the late Osama bin Laden
... who was potted in Pakistain...
he said: "The Taliban lost a whole government for one person."

The commander called on the US that only a true projection of Islam would stop them, otherwise, the Pak military will keep using them against its neighbours, especially US troops in Afghanistan.

"Pakistain, and especially America, needs to understand the true spirit of Islam, and they need to project the true spirit of Islam," he said. "That would be a good strategy to stop them."
Link


India-Pakistan
Imran Khan: from cricket hero to Pakistan leader?
2011-06-30
[Dawn] As an imperious all-rounder who dominated the cricket pitches he graced for more than two decades, Imran Khan
... who isn't your heaviest-duty thinker, maybe not even among the top five...
exhibited a self-belief that often made Pakistain's opponents crumble.

But that lordly demeanour may not serve him as well on the political wicket as a self-proclaimed saviour of the strife-torn country, despite his status as a national hero for leading Pakistain to its only World Cup title in 1992.

Khan brims with confidence that he can solve Pakistain's myriad and devastating problems.

Striding into an interview, kitted out in tiny running shorts and drenched in sweat after an afternoon workout in 80 percent humidity, he swats away any doubts about his prospects at the ballot box.

Nuclear-armed Pakistain returned to civilian rule in 2008 after nearly a decade under military dictator Pervez Perv Musharraf
... former dictator of Pakistain, who was less dictatorial and corrupt than any Pak civilian government to date ...
. Elections are due by 2013 at the latest.

Asked whether he would contest the next polls after boycotting the last vote, the 58-year-old was emphatic.

"Stand for election? We will sweep the election. What are you talking about -- 'stand'? The next party in power is going to be Tehreek-e-Insaf," Khan said, referring to the Movement for Justice party he founded.

"I'm taking bets with anyone. You know I played five World Cups, never did I ever tell anyone, except in the last World Cup, that we would win it," he added at his sprawling hilltop home overlooking the capital Islamabad.

Twenty-one years on the cricket pitch, he says, honed a "killer instinct" and with Pakistain lurching from political to economic to security crisis under the fragile People's Party coalition, he believes power is within his grasp.

But Khan's party has no seats in parliament and it is criticised for lacking grassroots support and the infrastructure needed to win an election.

While Khan was long a darling of the Western media, dazzled first by his "playboy" lifestyle and then celebrity marriage to -- and divorce from -- British heiress Jemima Goldsmith, his reputation at home is more circumspect.

Secular commentators, Western journalists and officials also express alarm at his policies -- in particular his call for an end to Pak military operations against the Taliban and his populist anti-Americanism.

Yet last week US pollsters Pew Research Center named Khan as the most popular politician in the country, with an approval rating of 68 percent. Pew gave President Asif Ali President Ten Percent Zardari
... sticky-fingered husband of the late Benazir Bhutto ...
a miserly rating of 11 percent.

Khan says Pew's findings were a vindication of his call for an independent judiciary, his anti-corruption drive and demands for an end to the "insane" war on terror conducted by the US-allied Pak leadership.

"The ruling elite, just for the sake of US support and dollars, is killing its own people, paid to kill its own people. It is the most shameful part of our history," he said.

The government, opposition and military have undoubtedly been discredited by rampant Taliban and al Qaeda-linked violence, economic meltdown, perennial political crises and the US raid against the late Osama bin Laden
... who has made the transition back to dust...
on May 2.

Khan rejects conspiracy theories that bin Laden was not killed in Abbottabad but describes his death at the hands of US Navy SEALs as "cold-blooded murder", comparing it unfavourably to the courtroom justice meted out to the Nazis.

Khan is a man of contradictions who straddles cultural divides; the elite world of his education at Oxford University, and that lived by the masses who are drawn to his cricketing appeal and calls to tax the rich.

His recommended reading is the "brilliant" "My Life with the Taliban" by Abdul Salam Zaeef, once the Islamists' ambassador to Pakistain and later an inmate at Guantanamo Bay.

Yet Khan rubbishes any prospect of Talibanisation in Pakistain, a country he says is dominated by the mystical Sufi strand of Islam.

His solution to the semi-autonomous tribal belt, where a homegrown Taliban insurgency is concentrated and foreign Islamic fascisti are based, is a peace agreement.

He compares his appeal to the popularity of prime minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, who was voted in on a socialist ticket in 1970 before being hanged nine years later following a military coup.

But few share his confidence.

Veteran political analyst Hasan Askari says Khan will struggle to translate crowds into votes and will suffer for his stance on the Taliban and his name-calling of opponents.

"People in Pakistain cast their votes with a lot of considerations, and Imran's problem is that he is calling every leader a thief," he said.
Link


Afghanistan
Taliban deny secret talks with Kabul
2010-10-23
Since clearly they aren't secret anymore...
[Iran Press TV] Talibs in Afghanistan say there is no hope for peace talks with the Afghan government, promising to continue the fight against US-led forces in the country.

Mullah Abdul Salam Zaeef, the former Taliban ambassador to Pakistain, said they have not been in contact with the Kabul administration despite recent reports.

The hard boy leader said the group will not enter into any dialog until all foreign troops leave the country.

"The fundamental problem, the basic problem is the ... occupation of Afghanistan. This is the real problem and the Americans want to ignore that," Rooters quoted Zaeef as saying.

"They are interested in peace on their own condition. To be safe, to be here ... and tell other countries 'do that' and they should do it," he added.

This is while NATO and Afghan officials say preliminary talks have been held between President Hamid Maybe I'll join the Taliban Karzai's government and the Taliban.

Karzai, who has been pushing for a negotiated settlement to the country's militancy, has set up a peace council tasked with brokering an end to the war with the Taliban.

Earlier in the week, Afghanistan's former president Burhanuddin Rabbani was elected chairman of the council.

Commander of the US-led NATO forces in Afghanistan General David Petraeus has recently confirmed the role of US-led foreign troops in taking Taliban leaders to Kabul for talks.

Meanwhile,
...back at the ranch...
some Afghan officials have said they doubt that contacts were taking place at senior levels of either the Afghan government or the Taliban.
Link


Afghanistan
45 Taliban, Qaeda members taken off UN terror list
2010-08-03
Ten Taliban members and 35 al Qaeda members and affiliates have been removed from a UN sanctions terror list after an exhaustive review of 488 names, Austria's UN ambassador announced on Monday.

"As a result of the review of 488 names, 45 were de-listed," chairman of the UN Security Council panel Thomas Mayr-Harting told the reporters. The council maintains a blacklist of individuals and entities linked to al Qaeda and the Taliban.

He said that those removed, following requests from governments, include 10 individuals associated with the Taliban as well as 14 individuals and 21 entities linked at some point to al Qaeda.

Amongst the 10 Taliban removed from the list was a former Afghan envoy to the UN, author of My Life with the Taliban, Abdul Salam Zaeef and two officials who are now deceased. A final decision for the 66 amongst them is still pending.

As part of his efforts to promote national reconciliation, Afghan President Hamid Karzai had asked the security council to remove names of some Taliban members who were not linked to al Qaeda, from the terrorism blacklist.
Link


Afghanistan
Five Taliban delisted by UN committee: diplomat
2010-07-31
[Al Arabiya Latest] Five Taliban have been struck off a U.N. Security Council list of people subject to sanctions -- a move sought by Kabul to ease reconciliation talks with bad boys, a U.N. diplomat said on Friday.

Two of the five were delisted because they were dead, the diplomat said.
The move followed a review of the list of Taliban and al-Qaeda members maintained by a Security Council committee. Two of the five were delisted because they were dead, the diplomat said.

Afghanistan had pressed the committee to take some names off the list as part of a scheduled update. A "peace Jirga" in Afghanistan last month recommended negotiations with moderate Taliban leaders and other bad boys to end a worsening nine-year war in the country.

Diplomats said Afghanistan's Caped President Hamid Karzai had been seeking the delisting of about a dozen Taliban, either because they had joined the government side or because they were dead.

But Russia, which sits on the committee along with other Security Council members, had been cautious about deleting names, they said.

The diplomat named the five delisted as Abdul Hakim Mujahid Mohammed Awrang, a former Afghan ambassador to the United Nations, Abdul Salam Zaeef and Abdul Satar Paktin, as well as Abdul Samad Khaksar and Mohammed Islam Mohammadi, who have both died.

Russia, diplomats said, has indicated reluctance to remove even the names of dead people from the U.N. blacklist, possibly because it would free up any frozen assets that could somehow be used to help fund the Taliban insurgency.

The committee has been reviewing all the more than 500 Taliban and al-Qaeda entries on the blacklist.

"The review of the Taliban and al-Qaeda sanctions list will continue," a diplomat said. "There may be more names coming off the list in the weeks and months ahead."

Five years ago Karzai's office had asked the Security Council committee that oversees implementation of resolution 1267, approved in 1999, to remove some 20 names from the roughly 140 on the list at the time. Some have already been removed.

Resolution 1267 freezes assets and bans travel of senior Taliban and al-Qaeda figures and firms associated with them.
Link


Afghanistan
Book review: My Life with the Taliban
2010-04-10
Mullah Abdul Salam Zaeef has all the credentials to write a book titled My Life with the Taliban. He was 11 years old when the Soviets invaded Afghanistan. He became a refugee in Pakistan and went to a madrassa. He was intimately involved in the movement that came to be known as the Taliban. He was in the same room as Mullah Omar when the latter lost his eye in a firefight with the Soviet forces. Zaeef was among those who proposed Mullah Omar's name for leadership of the Taliban movement when it was formally launched in the autumn of 1994. Mullah Omar agreed, without too much fuss, but demanded total loyalty to him. Zaeef later occupied important positions in the Taliban government in Kabul, rising to the high posts of deputy and acting defence minister. Mullah Omar appointed him the Taliban regime's ambassador to Pakistan, which he resisted but had to accept; no one could defy Mullah Omar once he had made up his mind. His stint in Islamabad provides the most interesting insights on Taliban rule, coinciding as it did with 9/11, the negotiations over handing over Osama bin Laden, the destruction of the Bamiyan Buddhas, isi's repeated efforts to win or buy over the author, etc. Surprisingly, Mullah Zaeef does not seem to have met, even once, Osama. He spent four years in Guantanamo, and now lives in Kabul.

Indian and Western as well as Pakistani readers would be surprised to learn from this book that relations between the Taliban and Pakistan were not always harmonious. In the weeks leading up to the American attack on Afghanistan in October 2001, Zaeef was accused by the isi chief of planning to assassinate Gen Musharraf. Zaeef invariably refused to go to the isi offices, insisting instead that they visit him at his official residence. Once the Russian ambassador asked the director in the foreign office to arrange a meeting with Zaeef, but Zaeef offered to meet him at a neutral place; the meeting never materialised. Tripartite talks between Afghanistan, US and Pakistan were sabotaged by Pakistan, he says. He told the American ambassador more than once that he should contact him directly. "Pakistan is never an honest mediator and will control and manipulate any talk they mediate or participate in," Zaeef told him. Elsewhere, he writes: "Pakistan, which plays a key role in Asia, is so famous for treachery that it is said they can get milk from a bull. They have two tongues in one mouth, and two faces on one head so they can speak everybody's language; they use everybody, deceive everybody. They deceive the Arabs under the guise of Islamic nuclear power, they milk America and Europe in the alliance against terrorism, and they have been deceiving Pakistani and other Muslims around the world in the name of the Kashmiri jihad." As for imprisonment in Pakistani jails, he concluded that Afghan and American jails were much better than Pakistani jails. He is understandably bitter about the way he was treated by Pakistan and handed over to the Americans in Peshawar.

Zaeef held four meetings with the US ambassador in Islamabad to discuss Osama bin Laden before 9/11. America had only one demand: hand over Osama. Zaeef told him that was the one thing they could not do. He made alternative proposals. If America provided enough evidence of Osama's involvement in the Kenya and Tanzania bombings, Afghanistan would try him. Or, he could be tried in an Islamic country in a special court consisting of attorney generals of three Islamic countries. Finally, he offered to curb any and all activities of Osama, who would also be stripped of all communications equipment so as to limit his outreach. Eventually, he even suggested that Osama could be tried in The Hague. He met US state department official Christina Rocca, well known in India, and writes: "Every word she uttered was a threat, hidden or open".
Link


India-Pakistan
Pakistain's brutal beneficiaries betray their refuge
2008-03-27
Despite a long history of using Pakistan as a safe haven, Taliban on the front lines of the insurgency say they have no loyalty to their neighbouring country. A survey of 42 insurgents in Kandahar found most were critical about Pakistan, where they are reported to have headquarters and supply lines, and most were critical of Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, often using the harshest language to describe him.

Some insurgents claimed they want to fight for the seizure of vast swaths of Pakistan's territory in the name of expanding Afghanistan to include the major cities of Quetta and Peshawar. Every fighter asked said those two cities belong inside Afghanistan, and all of them rejected the existing border as a legitimate boundary between the countries.

The Globe and Mail's modest sample of Taliban opinion may only reflect an effort by the insurgents to hide their sources of support in Pakistan, analysts say, or it may point to something more troubling: the growing indications that parts of the insurgency are no longer controlled by anybody. "If they are supported by ISI [Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence agency], why are they attacking Pakistan?" said Mullah Abdul Salam Zaeef, the former Taliban ambassador to Pakistan, after reviewing The Globe's raw video footage. "Why would the ISI want these kinds of activities in Pakistan? It's out of control. Nobody is able to control it. This is Afghan government propaganda, about the Pakistan government controlling the Taliban."

Few historians dispute that Pakistan's intelligence services played a decisive role in establishing the Taliban movement in 1994, and Islamabad appeared to retain a strong influence over the regime that seized Kabul two years later. President Musharraf formally cut ties with the Taliban in 2001, but in recent years a growing number of observers have accused Pakistan's agents, or former agents, of continuing their assistance for the radical movement.
Link


Afghanistan
Tribal animosity drawing Taliban recruits
2008-03-26
Stuff we knew all along, almost without thinking about it...
Canadian troops and their allies have been drawn into an ancient tribal feud that simmers beneath the conflict in southern Afghanistan. In a sample of ordinary insurgents, 42 fighters in Kandahar province were asked by The Globe and Mail to identify their own tribe, and the results point to a divide within the Taliban ranks: Only five named themselves as members of the three major tribes most closely associated with the government, suggesting that tribal animosity has become a factor that drives the recruitment of insurgents.
Five out of 42 is a smidge over 12 percent of a tiny sample size, isn't it?
"This government is a family business," said a prominent Afghan aid worker in Kandahar. "The other tribes get angry when a few tribes have all the power."

Afghan tribes often share the same ethnicity, religion, language and culture, but they're divided along ancestral lines that resemble the branches of a huge family tree. Little except bloodlines distinguishes most tribes from each other, but struggles for power among the tribes have been a source of bloodshed for centuries in this harsh land.

The small survey did not include enough interviews to draw firm conclusions about the tribal makeup of the Taliban, and the results may be biased by the tribal identity of the researcher who conducted the interviews since it would have been easier for him to find his fellow tribesmen in Taliban-controlled districts. But the findings appear to support the impression of many analysts that the Kandahar insurgency draws fighters most heavily from the tribes outside of the Zirak Durrani tribal federation, which dominates the local government.

The Taliban interviewed claimed origins from 19 different tribes, all of them part of the Pashtun ethnic group that occupies most of southern Afghanistan. The largest numbers came from the Noorzai and Eshaqzai tribes, which accounted for 16 of the 42 surveyed. Many members of those two tribes live in the most dangerous parts of the Panjwai valley, where Canadian troops have been fighting for the past two years, and they often complain about being alienated from Kandahar's government, with little representation in the administration.

The Popalzai tribe of President Hamid Karzai, by contrast, had relatively few members in the sample of insurgents. Only two Taliban identified themselves as Popalzai, and they appeared to have personal reasons for participating in the insurgency: One said his family had been bombed by foreign troops and the other said the government repeatedly eradicated his opium fields. There was a similar lack of insurgents from other tribes usually aligned with the government. "Currently there is war between the tribes," said a former Afghan intelligence officer, whose experience in Kandahar spans three decades.

But another observer said the friction between tribes still hasn't reached that point. "We don't have a true tribal war here, yet," said Neamat Arghandabi, head of the National Islamic Society of Afghan Youth, who said he remembers such feuding during the period of chaos in the early 1990s that followed the withdrawal of Soviet forces. "It's the worst," he said. "It has no borders, everybody fights each other and you have to hide your roots. But for now, it's like competition among political parties."

The fact that certain tribes are more heavily represented than others within the Taliban appears to be a touchy point with the insurgent leadership, which prefers to describe religion as the group's unifying force. The Globe and Mail's researcher was sharply criticized by Taliban when they learned he had been surveying the tribal background of insurgents.

Mullah Abdul Salam Zaeef, the former Taliban ambassador to Pakistan, scoffed at the idea of a tribally motivated insurgency as he watched The Globe's videos at his home in Kabul. "Among the Taliban, there is no difference between the tribes," Mr. Zaeef said. "The tribe issue among Taliban is not important."

But academics who monitor Afghanistan are paying increasing attention to the issue. Thomas Johnson, director of the Culture and Conflict Studies program at the Naval Postgraduate School in California, was among the first academics to describe the tribal underpinnings of the war. Three tribes that dominated Kandahar in the years after the Soviet withdrawal, the Popalzai, Barakzai and Alokozai, all from the Zirak Durrani group, lost significant power when the Taliban swept the country from 1994 to 1996, Mr. Johnson said. In their place, the tribal groups aligned with Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar installed themselves in the seats of government. The Taliban leader's own tribe, the Hotak branch of the Ghilzai federation, occupied seven of the senior positions in Mullah Omar's regime, according to Mr. Johnson's analysis.

The latest government in Kandahar has largely returned the Zirak Durranis to power, Mr. Johnson said, which reflects a tribal struggle that goes back hundreds of years.
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-12 More