Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

India-Pakistan
Karachi blasts investigation directionless: Naek
2007-10-27
Former premier Benazir Bhutto’s lawyer Farooq Naek said on Friday the investigation into the October 18 blasts in Karachi was directionless and the investigators hadn’t questioned any of the suspects that her client had mentioned in a letter sent to the president, a private channel reported. According to Geo television, Naek said it was a duty of the investigators to question the suspects irrespective of their status. Naek said foreign investigators should be asked for assistance, much like Bhutto had done for the probe into her brother Murtaza Bhutto’s murder during her tenure as prime minister. Naek said Punjab Chief Minister Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi should be investigated, since Bhutto mentioned his name in her list of suspects. Meanwhile, Federal Railways Minister Sheikh Rashid Ahmad told Geo television that the Pakistan People’s Party workers that died in the Karachi blasts were martyrs and Bhutto should pay the affected families Rs 10 million each, instead of just Rs 5,000. He said many people had returned the Rs 5,000.
Link


India-Pakistan
Imperialism's cronies will face attacks, says Sheikh Rashid
2007-10-24
Federal Railways Minister Sheikh Rashid said on Tuesday that the people working under the flag of imperialism would face more suicide attacks, as there was a strong reaction to US policies in Pakistan.

Addressing a press conference at a local hotel here, he said Benazir Bhutto’s talk of discussions with extremists had come too late. “She should have given this statement before coming to Pakistan. She was told that her life was in danger,” he added. However, the minister declined to respond to a question on whether President Pervez Musharraf was also a target for suicide attacks, as he supported several US policies.

Sheikh said the president had agreed to remove the bar on third-time premiership in his and Bhutto’s first meeting, but had not been willing to withdraw the cases against her. He expressed disapproval over a statement by Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain that implied that the Pakistan People’s Party was involved in the Karachi blasts. He said a working relationship between the political parties was very important for democracy.

He also demanded that Benazir, as “she is rich”, should announce at least Rs 10 million for each person that died on October 18. “The time of politicking on dead bodies is over — the electronic media conducts a postmortem for everyone from the government to the opposition. Nobody can gag the judiciary or media,” he added.
Is it just me, or is that statement pure blither?
Country polarised: He said the country was facing a polarisation similar to what it faced in 1990. “This was started by Benazir Bhutto’s side when she blamed three individuals for the bomb blast. Because of this, the National Reconciliation Ordinance has come under threat and the next two weeks are crucial,” he added.

Responding to a question on how Bhutto could rule a country after she had expressed a lack of confidence in its security agencies, he said, “The highest agency in Pakistan supported talks between the government and Benazir Bhutto. The head of that agency was on the team. If the agencies had not agreed to allow Benazir Bhutto to return, she would not have been able to return.”

Caretaker announcements: He said the name of a caretaker prime minister and chief ministers would be announced in the last week of October. “According to the Constitution, if the assemblies are dissolved on November 14, there will be an election campaign for 90 days and if the assemblies are dissolved on November 15, the election will be held within 60 days.” He rejected a PPP claim that three million people had welcomed Benazir, claiming there were only 100,000 to 200,000 people there.

Responding to a question, he said the PPP had a role in the country’s politics, but he did not see Benazir Bhutto becoming prime minister again. He said Maulana Fazlur Rehman would play an important role in future politics and should not be underestimated. He said there was a good working relationship between President General Musharraf and Benazir Bhutto, but the relationship between the PPP and PML was not good enough. He said the MQM would have a role in the future and their seats would not be reduced. “I foresee a hung parliament,” he predicted. He said as of October 23, there were no plans to allow Nawaz Sharif to return to Pakistan.
Link


India-Pakistan
Deal with Benazir finalised: Rashid
2007-08-14
Federal Railways Minister Sheikh Rashid Ahmed said on Monday that the Musharraf-Benazir deal had been finalised. He told reporters at a news conference that following the presidential elections, the general elections could be held in this year. He said he was not involved with "the idiots" who had advised the president to impose an emergency. About the reported deal between the Sharif brothers and the government, he said Malik Rafique and the late Ezaj Batwali brokered the deal.
Link


India-Pakistan
Attempt to bomb Lal Haveli foiled
2007-08-14
Security agencies have foiled a suicide-bombing attempt at an Independence Day public gathering to be held at Lal Haveli, which is the residence of Federal Railways Minister Sheikh Rashid Ahmad. Sources said that security agencies had sped up their search for suicide bombers, and on Monday they arrested two alleged suicide bombers and recovered suicide jackets and explosive from them. The suicide bombers told police that they were a group of five. On the information grilled from them, police conducted a raid at Dhok Khabba but could not arrest any other alleged suicide bomber.
Link


India-Pakistan
Force no solution to Afghan problems
2006-12-06
I hesitate to point this out, but force is one of Afghanistan's problems.
NWFP Governor Ali Mohammad Jan Orakzai said on Tuesday that the use of military force was not the solution to problems in Afghanistan, and hoped that the proposed jirgas on both sides of the Pak-Afghan border would help restore peace in the region.
How is it that the use of military force by the Talibs isn't a problem, but the use of military force against them is?
“The foreign offices of both countries have been working on the modalities for the jirgas, and Foreign Minister Khurshid Kasuri will visit Afghanistan tomorrow to discuss arrangements with his Afghan counterpart,” said Orakzai at press conference at the Peshawar Cantt Railways Station, after the inauguration of the Peshawar Express that will run between Peshawar and Rawalpindi. “A chance should be given for negotiations because peace cannot be restored by the use of military force in the troubled region,” he said. Federal Railways Minister Sheikh Rashid Ahmad, who attended the inauguration, said that Pashtuns could not be defeated by force, and “their hearts can only be won by love and jirgas”.
Sure the Pashtuns can be defeated by force. The way to do it would be to select one subtribe of Pashtuns and demand their surrender. If they didn't, then they would be wiped out. Move on to the next subtribe and repeat. If necessary, repeat a third time, but it probably won'e be necessary.
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-5 More