Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

Down Under
Australia says considering Guantanamo prison intake
2009-01-02
CANBERRA, Jan 2 (Reuters) - Australia is considering a U.S. request to re-settleinmates from the Guantanamo Bay military prison camp, but would apply strict security screening before accepting an unspecified number.

Acting Prime Minister Julia Gillard said on Friday the government had been approached along with Britain to accept inmates to help U.S. President-elect Barack Obama meet a promise to close the camp in a U.S. enclave on Cuba. "For anyone to be accepted they would have to meet Australia's strict legal requirement and go through normal rigorous assessment processes," Gillard said in a statement.

Gillard's office said it had not been decided who would be considered for intake and under what conditions.

About 255 men are still held at the Guantanamo naval base, including 60 the United States has cleared for release but cannot repatriate for fear they will be tortured or persecuted in their home countries.

Australian media said the government would accept no "wholesale intake" from Guantanamo and conservative opposition leader Malcolm Turnbull said Prime Minister Kevin Rudd should immediately rule out support for the plan. Rudd is currently on Christmas holiday. "What (Rudd) has agreed to, with the Americans, is to accept Guantanamo Bay inmates for resettlement in Australia, in our community, as migrants, and that is completely and utterly unacceptable to the Australian people," Turnbull told local radio.

Involvement in a Guantanamo re-settlement could threaten the government's record popularity, as surveys show security consistently ranks among the top concerns of Australians.

Keith Suter, a foreign affairs and politics expert at Macquarie University in Sydney, said former U.S. Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had effectively painted all Guantanamo inmates as extremists before resigning in 2006. But most, Suter said, had faced no proper charges under the U.S military court system used at Guantanamo and would likely have to be considered by Australia as ordinary refugees. "They'd be granted refugee status and they'd be settled into the community, and hopefully no fuss would be made about it," he said.
Just simple refugees. Heavily-armed, simple refugees.
Link


Iraq
Secret Iraq talks a failure
2006-12-11
SECRET talks in which senior US officials came face to face with some of their most bitter enemies in the Iraqi insurgency broke down after two months of meetings, rebel commanders have disclosed. The meetings, hosted by Iyad Allawi, Iraq's former prime minister, brought the country's insurgent commanders and the US ambassador to Iraq, Zalmay Khalilzad, together for the first time.

After months of delicate negotiations Dr Allawi, a former Baathist and a secular Shi'ite, persuaded three rebel leaders to travel to his villa in Amman, the Jordanian capital, to meet Mr Khalilzad for talks in January. "The meetings came about after persistent requests from the Americans. It wasn't because they loved us but because they didn't have a choice," said a rebel leader who took part in the talks.

The revelations came as a US Defence Department spokesman confirmed Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld flew to Iraq over the weekend in a surprise trip to thank troops for their service just days before he steps down from his post. Mr Rumsfeld resigned in November, the day after President George W. Bush's Republicans lost control of the US Congress with voter frustration over the Iraq war dominating the election.
Link


Caribbean-Latin America
Chavez says Bush should resign like Rumsfeld
2006-11-10
Anti-American Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez greeted the resignation of US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld on Wednesday with a suggestion that President George W Bush should follow him. “Heads have started to roll. The president should resign on moral grounds,” he told a news conference after an aide passed him a note with word of the resignation. “Rumsfeld should go to jail.” Chavez has a running feud with Bush, whom he calls the devil. He said the Democrats’ victory in mid-term elections on Tuesday was a vote against Bush’s Iraq war policy, which he hoped meant the United States would rein in its “imperialism.” Senior US officials say the leftist Venezuelan president is a threat to regional stability.
Link


Down Under
Howard slams Pentagon spy delays
2006-10-03
JOHN Howard has attacked the Pentagon for ignoring an order from George W. Bush to share top-level intelligence on Iraq with Australia's military planners, forcing the Prime Minister to complain to the US President.

Mr Howard confirmed yesterday he was angry at the Pentagon's decision to restrict Australia's access to its intelligence network on Iraq, and said he had complained directly to Mr Bush twice to clear the military veto.

"Some of these agencies operate like a law unto themselves," he said yesterday. "I wasn't very happy with those delays."

In an extraordinary attack on the defence chiefs of Australia's closest military ally, Mr Howard said he had protested to Mr Bush to ensure Australia had unfettered access to the network.

In July 2004, Mr Bush signed a directive supported by Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and acting Central Intelligence Agency director John McLaughlin stipulating that laws preventing foreign powers seeing highly classified intelligence would no longer apply to Australia and Britain when they were planning for combat operations, training with the Americans or engaged in counter-terrorism activities.

But Mr Howard was forced to intervene a second time some months later when it became clear the US military headquarters was still delaying, despite the White House request.

"The point I made was that the commitment the President gave to me had to be delivered," Mr Howard said. "That's why I intervened, and I am now advised the flows are occurring that are meant to occur.

"Bear in mind Australia and Britain are given specially privileged access to American intelligence assessments.

"There is always a degree of inter-agency jealousy about anybody having access to these things, even very close allies, and it did take a lot of pushing. Even the President doesn't always get what he wants straight away."

In September last year, The Australian revealed that Mr Bush had issued a decree upgrading Australia to the highest rank of intelligence partner the US has in the world - with resistance from US intelligence agencies.

This rendition of events concurs with the latest revelations from Washington Post journalist Bob Woodward in his book State of Denial, which chronicles the internal battles of the Bush administration and how these hampered the war effort.

The book reveals that Franklin C. Miller, appointed by Condoleezza Rice in 2001 as special assistant to the President and senior director of defence policy, felt the treatment of Australia and Britain was "one of the most inexcusable examples of a failure to get things done".

The Secret Internet Protocol Router Network, a classified system that stored intelligence, operation order and other technical data, carried a security warning known as NOFORN, or not for foreigners.

Unfortunately for the Australian and British troops fighting alongside the Americans in Iraq, it denied them access to information that Woodward says at times "went beyond the absurd".

He cites examples of British pilots flying US warplanes who were not allowed to read parts of pilot or maintenance manuals. In another case, raw intelligence gathered by British operatives was sent to a US centre that would then merge and distribute it to all the forces, but again with the NOFORN label, denying it to the British who had generated it as well as the Australians.

And rather than directly follow the White House access order, Woodward says, the Pentagon established a parallel version of SIPRNET, which still excluded past information the military did not want others to see.

When Mr Miller discovered the President's order was not being implemented, he fought with the Pentagon for months, which eventually led to a furious confrontation with some of the joint chiefs of staff.

"You don't mean unfettered access," one general says. But Mr Miller was blunt, says Woodward: "If the President or the Secretary of Defence had wanted to say give them access according to the following limitations, they would have said so.

"This is an inter-agency cleared document. Your people signed up to it. Access means access. What about 'access' don't you understand?"

Hugh White of the Australian National University, a former Defence Department deputy secretary for strategy and intelligence, told The Australian that Canberra had always had to battle for access to US intelligence and details of US planning in coalition operations.

"The Government sometimes claims that under its stewardship the alliance has changed fundamentally and become much closer," Professor White said. "This (Woodward's account) suggests that this is not the case."
Link


Home Front: Politix
Democrats call White House rhetoric on Iraq ‘outrageous’
2006-09-04
Opposition Democrats on Sunday expressed outrage at a campaign by President George W Bush’s administration portraying critics of the Iraq war as defeatists reminiscent of those who tried to appease Nazis before World War II.

Bush’s top aides, including Vice President Dick Cheney and Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, delivered strident speeches last week describing the conflict in Iraq as a crucial part of the “war on terror,” invoking World War II and the Cold War. “Can we truly afford to believe somehow, some way, vicious extremists can be appeased?” Rumsfeld asked in his address.

Democratic lawmakers said the White House was trying to attack its critics by questioning their patriotism and determination to fight terrorist threats. “I thought his statements were outrageous,” Representative Marty Meehan of Massachusetts told CNN’s “Late Edition”.
Link


Terror Networks
Experts fear Africa next big stage for Al Qaeda
2006-08-31
JOHANNESBURG - There is mounting evidence that the African continent will become the next Al Qaeda hotbed as the militant group seeks to expand its global operations, a senior expert on terrorism said. “Al Qaeda would logically look for Africa,” Peter Pham, director of the Virginia-based think-tank Nelson Institute for International and Public Affairs, told Reuters.

Speaking on Wednesday night at a security conference in Johannesburg, Pham cited Africa’s weak governments, large Muslim communities, rampant poverty and its proximity to the Middle East as factors that could make the continent a target. “It’s a natural base of (Al Qaeda) operation,” Pham said. “There is evidence that Africa will be the next front for Al Qaeda,” he added.

The two-day conference on “Combating and Preventing Terrorism in Africa” was held as senior defence officials in Washington said the Pentagon was considering the creation of a new military command responsible for Africa. They said the idea was being considered by Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld but no decision had been made. Responsibility for Africa is divided among three US military regions: European Command, Central Command and Pacific Command. A Pentagon official said a separate Africa command would not mean putting US troops in Africa but would “streamline the focus and give appropriate undivided attention to the continent”.

Africa has witnessed a number of bloody attacks, notably the 1998 bombings of US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, which killed 224 people, and the 2002 suicide attack on a tourist hotel in the Kenyan resort of Mombasa that killed 16. Al Qaeda was suspected in both cases. The African Union set up the African Centre for the Study and Research on Terrorism in Algeria last year, acknowledging that international terrorism had come to constitute a serious threat to peace in Africa. Beyond the immediate goals of dealing with active terror groups there were calls at the conference for more aid for economic growth and democracy.

The meeting is the first of its kind to be held in Africa, indicative of its growing strategic importance, particularly as a growing energy supplier to the United States. “West Africa now supplies 16 percent of US hydrocarbons - liquid natural gas and petroleum - and by 2015 it will supply more than 25 percent,” Pham said. “As it becomes more strategically important there’s greater interest.” The Horn of Africa has become an area of particular concern to western policymakers, given the ongoing battle for state control in Somalia between Islamists - suspected by the US of links to Al Qaeda - and the country’s transitional government.

The United States already has a strong presence in the Sahel under the $500 million Trans-Sahara Counter-Terrorism Initiative. It provides military expertise to nine Saharan states where swathes of desert are believed to harbour militant Islamist groups involved in smuggling and combat training. But Pham also pointed to West Africa where he said Lebanese militant group Hezbollah has tried to raise funds among the large Lebanese community. “There is a large Hezbollah fundraising presence in Africa on the west coast - in Guinea, Sierra Leone and Liberia.”

Counter-terrorism efforts in Africa have been criticised in the past by domestic opponents who say repressive governments have taken advantage of US President George Bush’s “War on Terror” to solicit western aid and clamp down on freedoms
Link


Home Front: WoT
US military to test new missile defence system
2006-08-29
Fort Greely, Alaska: The US military will test its missile defence system on Thursday, the fullest demonstration since a pair of tests grounded the programme 18 months ago. Military officials sought to lower expectations, though. Although a target missile will be fired from Kodiak Island, Alaska, and an interceptor rocket topped with a "kill vehicle" will launch from California's Vandenberg Air Force Base, both military and industry officials say they are not actually trying to shoot down the missile. "We are not going to try to hit the target," said Scott Fancher, head of Boeing Corp's ground-based missile defence programme. "It is not a primary or secondary test objective to hit the target."

After a tour of the missile interceptor silos on Sunday, Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said that although he wanted to see a "full end-to-end test,'' he was patient and rejected suggestions that the system should try to hit the target this time. "Why not proceed in an orderly way with the kind of the test expert people want to do?" Rumsfeld told reporters. "They do not have to do it to demonstrate to you."
Link


India-Pakistan
India offers to help safeguard Malacca Strait
2006-06-03
Blood vessels bursting in Beijing

SINGAPORE: India on Saturday offered to help safeguard the strategic Malacca Strait and backed a major East-Asian security initiative to enforce "compulsory pilotage" of the channel against pirates and maritime terror.

Outlining New Delhi's support to the initiative mooted jointly by Indonesia, Singapore and Malaysia, Defence Minister Pranab Mukherjee said India was willing to assist in the project and share its expertise in maritime security with nations of the region. "India welcomes the three nation initiative on monitoring shipping through compulsory pilotage project of Indonesia, Singapore and Malaysia,"

Mukherjee said in his speech at the Shangri La dialogue here. "Subject to the desire of the littoral states, as a major user-state, India would be willing to assist the project to whatever capacity is deemed suitable" the Defence Minister told eminent security experts gathered here for the 5th international Asia Security Summit.

With more than 50 per cent of India's maritime trade passing through the channel, security of the straits is important for India. The Malacca Strait is one of the world's most important and busy waterways with 50,000 ships passing through it each year.

Mukherjee said "other Asia-Pacific countries like Japan, China and South Korea are more dependent on the safe and secure passage through the Straits, where in recent years piracy has posed a major challenge", and hoped maritime terrorism does not follow closely behind".

The Defence Minister spoke after the US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had told strategic experts from Asia, Pacific and Europe that America would remain engaged in the region. Observing that there was a need to increase and strengthen regional cooperation to enhance maritime security, he said India has been working with the nations of the region, both bilaterally and multilaterally through forums such as ASEAN Regional Forum to further strengthen East-Asian sea lane safety.

This coordination, he said, had to be enhanced. "Otherwise as we have seen in the USS Cole bombing incident and recent attacks faced by the Sri Lankan Navy vessels" that a small incident can cause considerable loss of lives and equipment. The Minister also backed the move to set up a Regional Marine Training centre, saying it would help in evolving common operating procedures for the Navies of the region. He also said that New Delhi was taking steps to join the Container Security initiative and had identified the Nava Sheva port, near Mumbai.
Link


Southeast Asia
Indonesia wants US to stay away from Asia's anti-terror fight
2006-06-02
JAKARTA: Indonesia will tell the United States not to meddle in regional anti-terrorism efforts when US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld visits next week, Defence Minister Juwono Sudarsono said on Thursday. Rumsfeld is due in Indonesia from June 6-8 and was to discuss security in the piracy-prone Malacca Straits, military cooperation and anti-terrorism efforts with senior Indonesian officials, Sudarsono said.

"We will impress on the United States that the fight against terrorism in Indonesia and other ASEAN countries should be handled by respective countries and not based on the desire of the United States," he said. "We will tell the United States that fighting terrorism using their ways will only be detrimental to the United States because it will only create more anger and antipathy against America."
Link


Down Under
Howard wants US involved
2006-05-16
PRIME Minister John Howard has urged the United States to become more involved in international affairs, saying it is the only way to ensure world peace. Mr Howard made the plea to US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice during an official lunch at the State Department in Washington, a day after a private dinner with President George W. Bush.

He also said America's involvement in our region was key to its stability.

The Prime Minister has powered through a series of meetings with senior US officials, including Dr Rice, Energy Secretary Sam Bodman and the new chairman of the Federal Reserve, Ben Bernanke. The meeting with Mr Bodman appears to have ruled out Australia's involvement in a US plan to force countries which sell uranium to take back spent nuclear fuel rods for disposal.

Speaking from Washington Mr Howard also played down reports he is planning to hand over the Liberal Party leadership to Peter Costello by December.

This morning he was greeted by US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld on the steps of the Pentagon, surrounded by a military guard of honour.

Dr Rice opened the earlier lunch for about 100 dignitaries, including former US ambassador Tom Schieffer and former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan, with a toast to Mr Howard, his wife Janette and their son Richard. Describing them as "very, very good friends", she said the Howards were honouring America with their presence. She said that on her recent visit to Australia, she was able to witness the depth and breadth of the extraordinary relationship between the two countries.

She was able to thank the families of Australian soldiers who served side by side with Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan. "But all the way back, of course, to world wars that we successfully fought in the defence of freedom I was able to say to them that any time the United States is on the frontline in the defence of freedom, Australia is by its side. For that we thank you.

"I can't thank you enough for all that Australia does. Prime Minister and Mrs Howard, I'd like to raise a glass to this friendship, to this friendship based on shared sacrifice, ...this friendship based on an expectation of an even brighter future, given all that we've achieved in the past."

Mr Howard told the lunch that Australian and US forces first fought together in 1917, beginning a shared partnership in military conflict unbroken to this day. "In every major conflict our two countries have been engaged together," he said.

But it was the shared commitment to democracy and freedom, rather than the military association, that tied the countries together, he said.

He said the direction of America's power and purpose was vital to all the nations of the world. "Australia is one of those countries which is in the forefront of those who urge greater rather than lesser United States involvement in the affairs of the world," Howard said. "The involvement of your country in our own region is critical to its stability.

"And the energy and the intellect that you have brought to the position and the example that you represent in so many ways is a source of enormous admiration in my country and a source for very great respect around the world."
Link


Home Front: WoT
ICRC accuses US of blocking access to secret detainees
2006-05-13
The United States has again refused the International Committee of the Red Thingy Cross (ICRTC) access to terrorism suspects held in secret detention centres, the humanitarian agency said on Friday. The overnight statement was issued after talks in Washington between ICRTC President Jakob Kellenberger and senior officials, including Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley.

“Mr Kellenberger deplored the fact that the US authorities had not moved closer to granting the ICRTC access to persons held in undisclosed locations,” the Geneva-based agency said. Kellenberger said: “No matter how legitimate the grounds for detention, there exists no right to conceal a person’s whereabouts or to deny that he or she is being detained.” The former senior Swiss diplomat said that the ICRTC would continue to seek access to such people as a matter of priority.

The main objective of his annual visit this week was for the ICRTC to be granted access to “all persons held by the US in the context of the fight against terrorism, an issue he first raised with the US government over two years ago,” the agency said.
Link


Britain
Court rules Guantanamo Brits can sue
2006-05-09
A US court has ruled four Britons can take court action claiming their religious freedoms were infringed while they were detainees at Guantanamo.
The four, who were released in 2004 without any charges, are claiming $US10 million ($13.04 million) in damages from US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and other senior military officials.

A US District Court in Washington ruled yesterday action could go ahead under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which says US government officials must not stop any person carrying out their religious beliefs.

The action by Shafiq Rasul, Asif Iqbal, Ruhal Ahmed and Jamal al-Harith also alleges the Pentagon chain of command authorised and condoned torture and other mistreatment.

The US government argued at a hearing that the action should be dismissed.

But Judge Ricardo Urbina ruled the Britons' claims that they were mistreated and stopped from practicing their religion while incarcerated at the Guantanamo Naval Base could proceed under the 1993 act.

His decision said the allegation was that US government officials committed a "direct affront to one of this nation's most cherished constitutional traditions".

US courts have previously dismissed actions brought on behalf of Guantanamo detainees under the Geneva conventions and other actions claiming the behaviour of the US military at Guantanamo had been unconstitutional.

The Supreme Court is currently considering a case challenging the legality of military tribunals held at the base.

"Mr Rasul and the other plaintiffs in this case were denied basic rights to worship as part of a systematic attempt to denigrate them as human beings," said their lead lawyer Eric Lewis.

"Judge Urbina's decision sends a strong message that Secretary Rumsfeld and the Generals who implemented these policies will be held accountable," said Mr Lewis.
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-12 More