Down Under | ||
Hicks Won't Test Australia Controls | ||
2007-05-21 | ||
SYDNEY, Australia (AP) - David Hicks, the first Guantanamo Bay detainee to stand trial for terrorism, will not fight strict monitoring conditions likely to be imposed on his release from an Australian jail later this year, his lawyer said Monday. Hicks' return to Australia has prompted debate about how he will be treated after his release, with one possibility being a control order restricting his movement, requiring him to report to authorities, and other strict monitoring measures. Hicks' Australian lawyer David McLeod said his client would not oppose such an order. ``He doesn't want to be seen as someone who is bucking the system or being difficult. He is extremely grateful to everybody who has secured his return to Australia and he doesn't want to upset that,'' McLeod told Seven Network television.
McLeod said Hicks, a Muslim convert who left Australia in 1999 and joined fighters in Kosovo and Kashmir before going to Afghanistan, was overjoyed to be back in Australia. Hicks had ``a lot of regrets'' and accepts he was ``misguided,'' he said. ``He knows he's got the job ahead of him to prove he's not the monster he's made out to be,'' McLeod said.
| ||
Link |
Down Under |
Australian Qaeda supporter home from Guantanamo |
2007-05-20 |
![]() Hicks was the first person convicted by a U.S. war crimes tribunal since World War Two and was the first of hundreds of foreign captives, held at the Guantanamo Bay prison camp in Cuba, to face a military trial. Hicks will complete his sentence under a prisoner exchange agreement between Australia and the United states. He will be placed in the high-security G-division at Yatala, alongside Australia's worst serial killers, a gang of four who murdered 11 people and disposed of several bodies in barrels hidden in a disused bank vault. He will have little or no contact with other prisoners and all of his telephone conversations will be monitored. He will be allowed to meet his lawyers, but all other visits will be strictly controlled and will be limited to non-contact visits. As part of his sentence, Hicks will be banned from speaking to the media for a year after his March conviction, although Australia raised doubts over whether the U.S. gag order can be legally enforced. Australia's only other Guantanamo inmate, Mamdouh Habib, was released without charge and returned home in January 2005. |
Link |
Down Under | |
Premier questions community threat posed by Hicks | |
2007-05-14 | |
South Australian Attorney-General Michael Atkinson says the Premier is right to question the threat to the community posed by convicted terrorism supporter David Hicks. Hicks's Australian lawyer David McLeod is on his way to Cuba to bring his client back to Australia. The Guantanamo Bay detainee is scheduled to return to South Australia by May 29 to serve a nine-month sentence at Yatala prison. He is then expected to be released on December 29. As he departed yesterday, Mr McLeod criticised the State Government for trying to influence Hicks's treatment when he arrives. But Mr Atkinson says it is the Government's responsibility. "The State Government is responsible for the safety of South Australians," he said. "The Premier was right to put on the record in State Parliament exactly what David Hicks had admitted to. Those who want to treat David Hicks as a hero after that - I think the Premier's statement will give them some pause." Hicks could arrive in Australia as soon as the weekend. But Foreign Minister Alexander Downer says it is unlikely Hicks will be back by Sunday. Hicks's father, Terry, says the Government has gone over the top. "Nowhere in there it says he's killed anyone or blown anything up or anything like that," he said.
| |
Link |
Terror Networks |
David Hicks military trial to begin tonight |
2007-03-26 |
![]() More at link |
Link |
Down Under |
Guantanamo inmate lawyers target Australian govt |
2007-02-26 |
![]() Hicks Australian-based solicitor David McLeod asked the Federal Court in Sydney to rule on whether senior lawmakers had breached their ministerial duty by approving trial for Hicks through a US military commission. In effect the courts are being asked to review the actions of ministers in their dealings with other governments, McLeod told Australian Broadcasting Corp. radio. The Australian Federal Court was to rule first on whether it had jurisdiction to hear a case which government lawyers said interfered with ministerial control over foreign affairs. Opening the case, Solicitor-General David Bennett said the government had no legal obligation to protect citizens abroad. But Hicks lawyer McLeod said Foreign Minister Alexander Downer and Attorney General Philip Ruddock should have followed the lead of the British government and ensured its citizens were released from Guantanamo Bay. Its definitely not a stunt. Its an opportunity for Davids case to be aired before the courts and for the courts to take a view as to whether or not it has the power and authority to intervene to assist an Australian citizen, he said. As the hearing began, six top Australian legal figures wrote a public letter condemning the US military commission process, set up to try Hicks and other detainees. The fact of the matter is that this is not a regular court, its not a properly constituted court and it cannot deliver a fair trial, group spokesman and former Family Court Chief Justice Alistair Nicholson said. |
Link |
Down Under | ||
'Slipping' Hicks rejects consular staff | ||
2006-10-07 | ||
![]()
| ||
Link |
Down Under |
I can't take much more, Hicks tells his father |
2006-07-08 |
![]() Mr Hicks said that while his son was pleased about the court victory he was depressed that he was not being released. "That means I could be here for another 12 months or more and I can tell you now, I don't know whether I can last that long," Hicks told his father. "You don't realise how much pressure we are under here, the guards are absolute pigs." ![]() Following three suicides at the camp last month, Hicks told his father yesterday that the guards had "locked down" the facility. He said his books, table and chair, pen and paper had been removed, he had received no letters and spent most of his time in solitary confinement lying on a concrete floor. He said the guards would turn the air conditioning on full, make loud noises and sometimes take his clothes away. "Just listening to him talk he was so angry," Mr Hicks told the Herald. For 45 minutes his son told him about the conditions at the camp and said suicide was one of the few ways to get back at the guards. While he insisted he was not suicidal himself, he told his father: "We're being pushed, pushed, pushed all the time. Don't be surprised if things happen." Hicks was given only 30 minutes' notice of the phone call and was told at the same time he was being shifted to Camp Echo, out of solitary confinement. He apparently believed this meant he was being released and was deflated when he realised his mistake. Hicks's US lawyer, Major Michael Mori, was due to arrive at Guantanamo Bay last night to explain the court decision to him. |
Link |
Down Under | |
"I'm a true blue Aussie," Guantanamo detainee tells Howard | |
2006-07-07 | |
![]() SYDNEY (AFP) - An Australian held at Guantanamo Bay for more than four years has written a pleading letter to Prime Minister John Howard, insisting he is a "true blue Aussie" and not an evil terrorist. Somebody get David some extra bedsheets. And maybe another belt... David Hicks, who was captured in Afghanistan in December 2001 after allegedly fighting alongside the ousted Taliban regime, implores Howard to secure his release from the US military prison in Cuba. "I am determined to fit back into society and be a model citizen," Hicks, 31, writes in the letter, a copy of which was obtained Friday by AFP. "I am not an evil person or a risk to the Australian public and it saddens me that some may think so. On the contrary, I like to think of myself as a true blue Aussie. Australia is in my heart and forever will be." I'm a victim of coicumstances, I tell ya! His lawyer David McLeod said Friday that Howard had not responded, or even acknowledged the letter, written on January 21, 2005. Dear David, Eat shit and die. Regards, Office of the Prime Minister ![]() Is he closer to the breaking point then he was closer to the breaking point 2 years ago, Pops? "He said if I have to go another 12 months I do not know if I will last," Hicks' father said. Oh, I'll bet he will. Just so he can complain about being closer to the breaking point... "He was agitated, he was angry. It was terrible to listen to him," added Hicks, who requested permission through Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs to phone his son several months ago. Hicks said his son was facing tougher conditions in the US military prison since the suicide of three inmates last month. "They have taken all his rights off him," he told AFP. "No books, no writing. He has nothing. On occasions they take his clothing and turn the air conditioning on cold, up as high as it can go," he added. "They are pushing him to the limits." He said David no longer wanted to see Australian consular officials and believed they were misrepresenting his circumstances and failing to pass on his list of grievances. Hicks last received a consular visit two weeks before the June 10 suicides, according to McLeod. Prime Minister John Howard last month described the report from that visit as "positive." There was no immediate comment Friday from Australia's foreign affairs department. Political opponents and legal experts have rounded on Howard's government for doing nothing to help free Hicks. While Britain secured the release from Guantanamo of its nine nationals and argued the tribunals did not meet international legal standards, Howard supported the process. Since the Supreme Court ruling, he has urged Washington to find another means of trying Hicks.
Man, get out the big, GIANT violin... | |
Link |
Down Under | ||||||||
Apathy on Hicks 'unbelievable' | ||||||||
2006-03-11 | ||||||||
![]()
"From an American perspective, e would not tolerate it for an American citizen. I just can't believe it's not rubbing people in Australia the wrong way."
| ||||||||
Link |
Home Front: WoT |
Lawyers slam Pentagon ruling |
2005-09-21 |
Lawyers for Australian terror suspect David Hicks AKA Mohammed Dawood said they were shocked at the Pentagon's decision to push ahead with his trial. His defence team was caught by surprise at the decision to hold another hearing at Guantanamo Bay within 30 days. US Marine Corps Major Michael Mori said his client was to be "the guinea pig for this unfair and rigged show trial". Major Michael Mori also challenged claims the defence team was prepared to proceed with the trial, saying the defence office was severely undermanned. His view was repeated by Mr Hicks' father, who said the procedure was "a sham". "This is going to be another case of moving too fast ... the defence isn't ready yet," Terry Hicks said. "David's being used one again as a political football. Bring him home. Let's get him back here." John Altenburg, the appointing authority for the US military commissions set up to hear cases, lifted the stay on Mr Hicks' trial this morning. He directed the presiding officer to hold a hearing within 30 days to resolve preliminary issues, the Pentagon said. A second session would be convened a short time after to pick other commission members and to resolve any other outstanding motions. "This decision clears the way for the Hicks trial by military commission to resume at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in the near future," the Pentagon said. The ruling was attacked by Mr Hick's Adelaide-based lawyer, who said his client's defence team had no chance of being ready to proceed with the case. "I can only assume that it has come as a result of pressure from the Australian Government," said David McLeod. Mr McLeod was highly critical that Mr Hicks' defence team learnt of the development through the media. "Nobody has spoken to the defence, it's disappointing and outrageous," he said. "It wouldn't happen anywhere in the world, and therefore doesn't happen in any criminal jurisdiction." He said his client would be unaware of the latest development. "He obviously wants to be put before a fair tribunal - he doesn't care where, as long as it complies with accepted standards of justice." No trial date was set in the Hicks case, but the action in effect opened a window from October 3 through October 20 during which the case might be heard, officials said. The action follows a federal appeals court ruling in July that reaffirmed President George W. Bush's authority to order trials of war-on-terror detainees by special military commissions in the case of Salim Ahmed Hamdan. Lawyers are appealing that case to the Supreme Court, but Pentagon officials said they had decided to proceed with the Hicks case anyway. "The Australians have indicated their desire to see the Hicks case move forward as expeditiously as possible, but at the same time we are cautious to ensure that he receives a full and fair trial," a Pentagon official said. Adelaide-born Hicks is charged with conspiracy, attempted murder and aiding the enemy. The 29-year-old Muslim convert has been detained by the US military since he was captured allegedly fighting with the Taliban in Afghanistan in December, 2001. The US alleges he had links to the terrorist group al-Qaeda. Major Mori said today: "Mr Hicks is the only one facing a commission. "The lifting of the abeyance in the case of David Hicks makes clear that David Hicks will be the guinea pig for this unfair and rigged show trial ... and the test case for the commission process. "The military commission system will not provide a full and fair trial, whether it starts today, in a month or in three months. "The rules are constantly changing. "The system is controlled by those who have already condemned Mr Hicks." He said it had taken seven months to get a second military lawyer to assist in representing Hicks and the one eventually assigned already held a full-time position in Germany. "The prosecution has been provided seven different counsels to work on the Hicks case over the past two years with four still currently assigned," he said. "The staffing of the appointing authority's office is at 18 personnel, the prosecution's office at 25 personnel and the defence at five personnel." |
Link |
Down Under | ||
Lawyer's assessment concerns Hicks's dad | ||
2005-06-23 | ||
![]()
| ||
Link |
Down Under |
Hicks at breaking point, says lawyer |
2005-06-23 |
![]() |
Link |