Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

Britain
Now we’re for it: we’ve stopped behaving badly
2008-07-13
There have been many very different reactions to Max Mosley’s basement bunk-up. Some have been offended and some unmoved, but most people, since it’s so Carry On up the Khyber, have read the reports and sniggered.

Hmmm. I wonder if I’m alone in having a bit of respect for the man. I mean, there he is, a 68-year-old pensioner getting it on with five girls in the middle of the afternoon. Fair play to you, fella.

I felt much the same way when I heard Prince William had put his chopper in Kate Middleton’s back garden. Oooh, there was a lot of harrumphing – but come on, chaps. The man’s a prince. All he did was borrow one of his granny’s helicopters to drop in on the floozy. Wouldn’t you?

David Cameron laid out a new set of guidelines last week to which all Tory MEPs must now adhere. They fill me with horror and dread because it means we’re soon to be governed by a bunch of people who go to bed at 10, only drink ginger beer, never try to look up their secretaries’ skirts and are quite happy to get paid £4.50 an hour. In short, we’re going to be governed by bores and failures.

Why is this a good idea? No one says of their friends, “I chose them because they are all so kind to animals and they do good works.” We like people who like to laugh, to have fun, to break the rules once in a while.

Trouble is, it’s hard to find people like that any more . . .

In the olden days Private Eye was full of stories about journalists who’d ripped off their employers for 40 grand and been in bed with a hooker when the story they were supposed to be covering broke. Now, it’s just an endless parade of mild hypocrisy. Eighteen months ago the Daily Mail said this. And now it’s saying the exact opposite. So what.

The maelstrom of expenses fraud and serial shagging has become a gentle eddy of honest-to-God mistakes. And whatever happened to the long lunch? Today, whenever I order a glass of wine in the middle of the day, people look at me as though I might be a Martian. And that’s before I step outside for a cigarette.

This brings me on to Amy Winehouse. Has it occurred to anyone that she might be having a jolly good time? In the 1950s and 1960s, before the world became so po-faced, the rich and the famous would gather in Mustique and the south of France for debauched, drug-fuelled orgies and no one batted an eyelid. Today we tut because Russell Crowe has thrown a telephone at someone. And look what happens when an Old Etonian tries to make some governmental alterations in Africa. Instead of a statue in Trafalgar Square he gets 34 years in the slammer.

Imagine if we had someone like Winston Churchill in power today. A smoker. A drinker. A man given to Herculean bouts of depression. Under a hailstorm of criticism he wouldn’t last a week. Look at poor old Charles Kennedy. Gone now and replaced with someone who, I feel sure, would get a dopamine rush from taking his dog for a walk.

It’s the same for all of us. You can be ostracised by your neighbours for putting your refuse in the wrong-coloured bin, you can have your car vandalised if it has four-wheel drive and last week there were calls for cyclists to be jailed if they attempted to enliven this ludicrous means of transport by getting a move on.

Worse, the town of Redruth in Cornwall has imposed a 9pm curfew on all under16s, which means that every 15-year-old boy must now be at home each evening with his parents watching Panorama. I fear the Cornish courts had better brace themselves for a massive increase in cases of matricide.

I look sometimes at the microcosm that is my own life and it’s terrifying. Because in recent years I have been criticised for bumping into a horse chestnut tree; I’ve been called a berk, on the front page of a national newspaper, for using an iPod while driving. And only a couple of weeks ago I was “blasted” for enjoying a gin and tonic while at the North Pole.

There’s a constant bombardment for me to sit up straight, eat my greens, comb my hair. It drives me mad. Honestly. Next time James May and I are at a Pole, we’ve decided he’s going to mainline heroin and I’m going to shoot a baby polar bear in the face. For fun.

I fear for our future. I worry that bad behaviour is being erased from society, and that unless the trend can be reversed somehow we’ll all have to go through life on the Planet Stepford, a rictus grin masking the boiling turmoil of desperation inside. I yearn sometimes when I encounter a neatly stacked pyramid of tins of beans to push it over. Don’t you? Wouldn’t it break the monotony of having to drive at 30mph and eating a wholefood fair-trade sandwich at your desk.

Recently Annie Robinson and I dreamt up a TV show that would serve as an antidote to the endless parade of hectoring and finger-wagging programmes we get today. Instead of running down the street after a cowboy builder who’d charged an old lady a million quid to build a fireplace, we would go after the victims.

It was to be called Sucker and it would celebrate the ingenious while pointing the finger and howling with laughter at the stupid, the gullible and the fat. Never has the nation needed such a show more. And never has such a thing been less likely to get commissioned. Unless, of course, we could get Max Mosley to present it.
Link


Africa Subsaharan
Thorpe calls for Mugabe assassination
2008-07-03
Jeremy Thorpe, the former leader of the Liberal Party, has called for the assassination of Robert Mugabe. Speaking to the Journal of Liberal History, he was asked his views on the Zimbabwean leader. Thorpe, now 79, began tamely enough, saying: "I think he is a ghastly, wicked man", but when asked how he should be dealt with, he hardened his line: "He should be assassinated."

Of course, Thorpe knows a little of this sort of thing. In 1979, he was put on trial for conspiring to murder Norman Scott, a male model who claimed to be his lover. Although he was acquitted, he had to defend claims that he had incited David Holmes, the then deputy Treasurer of the Liberal Party, to have Scott bumped off, using a retired airline pilot as a hitman.

These days Thorpe lives a quiet life, having developed Parkinson's disease. However, he retains an acute interest in politics. Asked about the new Lib Dem leader, Nick Clegg, he said he was "doing well". Charles Kennedy, he believes, was "treated very badly". "Drunkenness," he said, "is not a permanent disability. It can be treated".
Link


Home Front: Politix
Obama bagman to jail over $3.5m payment by British tycoon
2008-02-01
Perhaps there's a reason why 'Bamer wants an Islamic summit and an immediate withdrawal from Iraq ...
An undeclared $3.5 million (£1.8 million) payment from a corrupt Iraqi-British businessman has landed Barack Obama’s former fundraiser behind bars. The payment, disclosed in court papers, is the first time that Mr Obama’s long-serving bagman Antoin “Tony” Rezko, a Syrian immigrant to the United States, has been linked to Nadhmi Auchi, the Iraqi-born billionaire who is one of Britain’s richest men. The relationship is a potential embarrassment for Mr Obama, who has made his opposition to the Iraq war a central plank of his campaign.
In the distance I hear a cackle ...
Court papers describe Mr Rezko as a close friend of Mr Auchi. The two are involved in a large Chicago land development together. But it is unclear how long the two men have known each other or whether they were linked before the 2003 Iraq war. Neither side would discuss their relationship.

The Times has, however, discovered state documents in Illinois recording that Fintrade Services, a Panamanian company, lent money to Mr Obama’s fundraiser in May 2005. Fintrade’s directors include Ibtisam Auchi, the name of Mr Auchi’s wife. Mr Auchi’s spokespeople declined to respond to a question about whether he was linked to this business.

Mr Rezko, to be tried for corruption this month, had his bail revoked on Monday after he disobeyed a court’s instructions to keep it informed of changes to his finances. Prosecutors feared that he could try to flee abroad. The property developer has been condemned by Hillary Clinton as a “slum landlord”.
She had a chance to call him that to his face; wonder if she ever did ...
According to prosecution documents Mr Rezko tried to persuade unnamed Illinois officials to help Mr Auchi to get a US visa after he was convicted of fraud in France. Mr Obama’s aides deny that he was approached.
"No, no, certainly not!"
Mr Rezko has been indicted for pressuring companies seeking state business for kickbacks and campaign contributions, although none for Mr Obama. He was granted bail in October 2006. He told a judge that he had no access to overseas money. But in April 2007 Mr Auchi’s business, General Mediterranean Holding (GMH), wired $3.5 million to Mr Rezko from a bank account in Beirut via a law firm.

Mr Auchi has attracted attention at Westminster because of his closeness to politicians and the Establishment. He says that his brother was executed by Saddam Hussein’s regime. His business partners in Britain have included Lord Steel of Aikwood, the former Liberal leader, and Keith Vaz, the Labour MP and Home Affairs Committee chairman.

On the 20th anniversary of his business in 1999, Mr Auchi received a greeting card signed by 130 politicians, including Tony Blair, William Hague and Charles Kennedy, who were then leaders of their respective parties.

Norman Lamb, the Liberal Democrat MP, went on to table parliamentary questions asking why the Blair Government appeared slow to respond to a French extradition request. Mr Lamb said last night: “It’s a matter of public interest to understand why the payments were made. This deserves thorough investigation.”

Mr Auchi founded GMH in 1979, a year before he left Iraq. He says that he did business with his native country when it was considered a friend of the West but ceased to trade with Saddam’s regime once sanctions were imposed after the invasion of Kuwait.

US prosecution documents recall Mr Auchi’s suspended jail sentence and €2 million fine for corruption in France five years ago. Defence lawyers said that Mr Auchi lent the $3.5 million for legal and family expenses. Most of the money had gone directly to law firms and there had been no attempt to flee. “While the Government attempts to besmirch Mr Auchi’s character,” they said, “he is one of Britain’s wealthiest men, has been a guest at the White House and met with two of the last three presidents, was Co-Chair of the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard, is President of the Anglo-Arab Organisation, and has received numerous awards and honorary positions from heads of state, including Queen Elizabeth II, Pope John Paul II, and King Abdullah II of Jordan.”
He flosses, too.
Mr Auchi’s lawyers added: “Mr Auchi flatly and categorically denies any wrongdoing in relation to the matters that led to his conviction in France and he is pursuing an appeal against it.” Mr Auchi is also suing the oil company Elf in France for dragging him unwittingly into the scandal.
How could anyone be unwitting in any dealing with Elf?
Link


Britain
(Brit) Kennedy resigns
2006-01-08
Charles Kennedy, leader of Britain's third-biggest party, has resigned after support from his colleagues evaporated when he admitted he had had treatment for alcohol abuse. The Liberal Democrats, the only major party in Britain to oppose the Iraq war, will now face a leadership contest. Mr Kennedy, 46, decided to step down after days of turmoil following his surprise admission at a news conference on Thursday. He had always previously denied having a drink problem. "I am standing down as leader," he told reporters at Liberal Democrat headquarters on Saturday. "When nominations open (for the leadership) I shall not be putting my name forward."

He said he had received much support from rank and file members but recognised that grass roots support alone was not enough. "It has become clear that such support is not reflected strongly enough across the parliamentary party," he added. Mr Kennedy had provoked a near mutiny amongst Liberal Democrat Members of Parliament when he refused to resign after publicly admitting his alcoholism.
Link


Britain
(Brit) Kennedy: Booze Confession
2006-01-06
Liberal Democrat leader Charles Kennedy has confessed to being treated for alcoholism and has called a leadership election. In a personal statement, he said: "Over the past 18 months, I have been coming to terms with and seeking to cope with a drink problem. Let me be clear, I consider myself to be capable and in good health."

He made it clear he wanted to continue leading the party but said it was time to back him or sack him. Mr Kennedy, 46, added that he had not drunk alcohol for two months and believed "this issue is resolved". The MP said he had chosen not to acknowledge his drink problem publicly before because "I wanted to overcome it privately. So, in a sense, this announcement today comes as something of a personal relief."

The embattled MP has been fending off critics for months, prompting doubts about his effectiveness in the top job. He rejected repeated calls for a vote of confidence in his leadership saying it would be a distraction. Sky's Political Editor Adam Boulton said: "Kennedy has hit the panic button. Whatever the outcome of this election, the people who will be celebrating tonight are the Conservatives."
Link


Britain
Critics warn new anti-terror plans could alienate British Muslims
2005-08-07
I love that headline, just as much as I love the reasoning or lack thereof behind it. Y'see, just because nine Moose limbs either exploded or tried to explode in the British public transit system, inflicting a large number of casualties on their fellow citizens or inhabitants in the name of their religion, that's no reason to take any action to protect the nation against members of their religion who may feel called upon to do the same thing. You might alienate other homicidal maniacs, who would them attempt to... ummm... do the same thing they were going to do anyway.
Prime Minister Tony Blair's government on Saturday defended its plans to crack down on extremist Islamic clerics who preach hate, as critics warned the measures could further alienate British Muslims.
Just an aside here, but when I was a lad, the noun was "hatred" and the verb was "to hate." When did the language change?
Britain's chief legal official, Lord Chancellor Charles Falconer, said the deadly attacks in London on July 7 showed the government must act against people "who are encouraging young men who are becoming suicide bombers. I think there is a very widespread sense in the country subsequent to July 7th that things have changed. A new balance needs to be struck. It needs to be a lawful balance but it needs to be an effective balance," he told British Broadcasting Corp. radio.
To me, that seems the very voice of sweet reason, but then I'm a linear thinker who believes in cause and effect...
Since the bombings on three subway trains and a bus, which killed 52 people and four suspected suicide attackers, Blair's government has been trying to build support among political opponents and Muslim leaders for new anti-terrorism legislation. On Friday, the prime minister announced proposals to deport foreign nationals who glorify acts of terror, bar radicals from entering Britain, close down mosques linked to extremism, ban certain Islamic groups and, if necessary, amend human rights laws.
That's basic management school stuff. If you have a problem, you identify solutions, staff them, apply feedback within constraints, then implement them.
But the government's new plans appear to have cracked the spirit of consensus. Liberal Democrat leader Charles Kennedy warned the measures could alienate the law abiding majority of Britain's 1.8 million Muslims and inflame tensions.
Whoa, there Chuck! The measures involve deporting foreign nationals who glorify acts of terror, which the presumably law-abiding majority of Muslims should be happy to support; barring radicals from entering Britain, which would keep the population law-abiding, rather than flavoring it with the lawless; closing down mosques linked to extremism, which the law-abiding presumably don't frequent; and banning certain Islamic groups on the basic of their lack of law-abidingness. Which of those points, precisely, do you object to?
"A fundamental duty, a responsibility on all of us, whether government or nongovernment, is to uphold the rule of law and the safety of the citizen," he said.
Hey! Boilerplate! Go ahead, ooze some more platitudes...
"But alongside that, of course, is to uphold civil liberties and the right to free speech. It is getting that balance right that will be very important ..." he told BBC radio.
Agreed. It's very important. Also important is stopping people from killing large numbers of Londoners with explosives in the public transportation system and maiming even more.
A British Muslim group called the Islamic Forum Europe warned the measures could jeopardize national unity in Britain.
That means they don't like it, pehaps because they're not... ummm... law-abiding at heart...
"If these proposed measures are allowed to see the light of day, they will increase tensions and alienate communities. The measures are counterproductive and will encourage more radicalization," said forum President Musleh Faradhi. "Many Muslims will perceive our prime minister as playing into the hands of the terrorists." He also criticized the government's plans to ban Hizb ut-Tahrir, a radical Islamic group that calls for the formation of an Islamic caliphate and is banned in several countries in Central Asia. Supporters insist it is a nonviolent group persecuted by corrupt governments. "Proscribing it will be counterproductive," said Faradhi. "It will give a green light to despotic leaders in the Muslim world to silence political dissenters."

Meanwhile, three men were scheduled to appear in court Saturday charged with failing to disclose information about the whereabouts of a suspect in the failed July 21 London bomb attacks. The Metropolitan Police said Shadi Sami Abdel Gadir, 22, Omar Almagboul, 20, and Mohamed Kabashi, 23, were charged under the Terrorism Act with withholding information that they "knew or believed might be of material assistance in securing the apprehension, prosecution or conviction" of a terrorist suspect. Three other people already face similar charges, including the wife and sister-in-law of suspected bomber Hamdi Issac, who is being held in Rome.

A postscript...
I had to go out before I'd finished my train of thought on this article, specifically the part about how "the measures could jeopardize national unity in Britain."

I think I've made the point before that "unity" can be a good thing or it can be a bad thing. A common assessment of national purpose is a good thing. But if I step outside and see my next door neighbor, grab her by the neck, throw her to the ground and begin copulating, she and I have achieved a certain unity of purpose. She's still being raped. If I stop by the liquor store to buy a bottle of underpriced champagne and stick my trusty .38 in the cashier's face and holler "gimme your dough!" we've achieved a certain unity of purpose as he's handing over all the money. He's still being robbed. There are times when a certain amount of difference of opinion is good, even if it degenerates into a domestic altercation complete with throwing crockery and calling names. That's because sometimes one side of an argument is right and the other side is wrong. Those who're right have an obligation to stick to their principles, regardless of whether the other side is jumping up and down and rolling its eyes and calling bad names.
Link


Britain
Al-Muhajiroun refuses to condemn London bombings, warns of more attacks
2005-07-19
Tony Blair met leading British Muslims at No 10 Downing Street today and said afterwards that the Muslim community was agreed on the need to tackle "head on" the problem of extremism in its midst.

The terror summit came nearly two weeks after four young Muslims blew themselves up in co-ordinated suicide bombing attacks on a London bus and three Tube trains, killing at least 56 people.

Mr Blair said all those at the meeting, which included 25 Muslim representatives and business leaders, agreed on the need to help identify and weed out potential terrorists in Muslim communities.

"There was a strong desire from everybody there to make sure that we establish the right mechanisms for people to be able to go into the community and confront this in a serious way," he added.

The meeting is expected to lead to the creation of a taskforce, whose members will be asked to listen to young Muslims across the country, and find out what turns young men leading visibly normal lives into mass murderers.

Shahid Malik, the Labour MP for Dewsbury, where one of the London bombers lived, said as he emerged from the summit: "The feeling was that there is a profound challenge. I think everyone here is up for the challenge. We have to work better at confronting these evil voices, minute as they are in our community."

But before the meeting, two of the country's most controversial Islamic militants said that Muslims should not be sitting down to negotiate with the Government. In an interview with BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Anjem Choudary, leader of the dissolved militant group al-Muhajiroun, refused to condemn the July 7 suicide bombings and gave warning that there was a "very real possibility" of another terror attack in the UK.

"I don’t think one should legitimately sit down and negotiate," Mr Choudary said. "I think the time for talking, quite honestly, is over. Now is the time for action. You can’t sit down and negotiate while you are murdering Muslims in Iraq."

He added: "It is not a question of whether one condemns or condones what took place on 7/7 - 7/7 is a reality. We need to see what caused this particular effect, otherwise we are going to continue in a cycle of blood and I believe another 7/7 is a very real possibility."

Mr Choudary's comments were echoed by Omar Bakri Mohammed, the radical Syrian-born cleric who has been accused of trying to foment hatred in the UK. Although he condemned the July 7 attacks, he said the British people only had themselves to blame because they re-elected Mr Blair despite the Iraq war.

Mr Bakri told the London Evening Standard: "I blame the British Government and I blame the British people. They are the ones who should be blamed. The British Government has said, ‘You are with us or with terrorism’. I don’t think that is the way forward."

Sir Iqbal Sacranie, secretary-general of the Muslim Council of Britain, said that the meeting was "an important listening exercise for the Prime Minister and people across the Muslim spectrum". He added that what was was needed now was a "bit of space" so that no-one "rushed into solutions".

Michael Howard, the Conservative Party leader, and Charles Kennedy, of the Liberal Democrats, also attended. Mr Howard said: "I think the one thing really that comes out most strongly from this meeting is the responsibility of the Muslim community for reaching out to those who have been the targets of the merchants of evil and hatred. We know that they have been targeting young Muslims and filling their minds with their messages of hate."

The three major parties yesterday reached cross-party agreement to rush new laws on to the statute book by December preventing the preparation and incitement of terrorist acts and the training of terrorists.

Longer-term measures also under consideration by the Government include forcing mosques to make criminal record — and possibly police intelligence — checks on any person given unsupervised access to young people.

Schools and children’s homes already have a statutory obligation to make these checks. Many religious groups routinely follow suit, but most mosques and Muslim community centres do not. Ministers are understood to be astonished that no screening is done of imams, officials and volunteers in mosques, who can spend hours talking to impressionable teenagers.

Another area of concern is the role played by more than 100 independent Islamic schools operating outside the state system. David Bell, the head of Ofsted, said in January that such schools were a potential threat to national identity. He called on the Government to monitor their growth to ensure that pupils learnt "the wider tenets of British society", such as "respect for other cultures in a way that promotes tolerance and harmony".

There has been controversy over state-funded Muslim "faith schools". But ministers believe that these are a better way of meeting parents’ desire for an Islamic education, not least because they have to follow the national curriculum and are subject to regular inspections.
Link


Britain
MI5 failed to arrest Khan
2005-07-19
Criticism of the British government grew Monday over the revelation that the vaunted domestic intelligence service did not detain one of the London attackers last year after linking him to a suspect in an alleged plot by other Britons of Pakistani descent to explode a truck bomb in the capital.

MI5 (search) found itself under fire as new information emerged Monday about the bombers' connection with Pakistan: Two of the suspects traveled together to the southern city of Karachi (search) last November and returned to London in February. A third bomber went to the same city last July.

The British intelligence service reportedly did not find Mohammad Sidique Khan (search) — who was checked out in connection with the alleged bomb plot last year — to be a threat to national security and failed to put him under surveillance.

The Home Office, which speaks for MI5, declined to comment on the suggestion that agents had dropped a crucial lead, or on reports that a Briton of Pakistani origin suspected of links to Al Qaeda had entered the country two to three weeks before the attack and flown out the day before.

If true, "this would indeed be evidence of an enormous failure," said Charles Shoebridge, a security analyst and former counterterrorism intelligence officer.

The government, meanwhile, reacted sharply to a report by two leading think tanks that said Britain's close alliance with the United States in the Iraq war has put it at particular risk of terrorist attack.

The Royal Institute of International Affairs (search) and the Economic and Social Research Council (search) said the situation in Iraq had given "a boost to the Al Qaeda network's propaganda, recruitment and fund-raising" and provided an ideal training ground for Al Qaeda-linked terrorists.

"The terrorists have struck across the world, in countries allied with the United States, backing the war in Iraq and in countries which had nothing whatever to do with the war in Iraq," Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said in Brussels, Belgium.

Despite criticism of British intelligence, the government has not launched any investigations into why the security services did not pick up the London bombers before July 7, when the attackers blew up three London subways and a double-decker bus, killing 56 people.

"All the political parties are agreed that the right course at the moment is to focus on what further steps need to be taken in relation to the law but also getting to the root of that evil ideology that is driving this terrorism," Charles Falconer, the lord chancellor, told the BBC. "Now is not the time for any form of inquiry."

Critics acknowledged that intelligence officials face a tricky task in choosing how to allocate their resources for tasks like surveillance.

Nonetheless, "had the assessment of the available intelligence regarding Khan been different, so might also have been the outcome of July the 7th," Shoebridge said.

According to The Independent and other British newspapers, British intelligence reportedly found that Khan, 30, had visited the home of a man linked to an alleged plot to blow up a London target, possibly a Soho nightclub, with a fertilizer bomb.

In that investigation, detectives arrested eight suspects across southern England in March 2004 and seized a half ton of ammonium nitrate, a chemical fertilizer used in many bomb attacks.

The eight suspects were to go to trial this year. But given the July 7 attacks, the trial may be delayed, Scotland Yard told The Associated Press.

John Carnt, a former Scotland Yard (search) detective superintendent with expertise in counterterrorism and covert surveillance, said intelligence agencies are so bombarded with information it can be hard to home in on an individual.

Khan's "might have been one name amidst many other names, and there may have been nothing else that added weight to it," said Carnt, now managing director of Vance International Ltd., a London-based security and intelligence company. "You've got bits of information coming across your desk. It can be difficult to identify which bit to pay closer attention to."

Khan traveled to Karachi in November with fellow bomber Shahzad Tanweer (search), 22, said Shahid Hayyat, deputy director at Pakistan's Federal Investigation Agency. Hasib Hussain (search), the 18-year-old bus bomber, went to the same city in July.

The purpose of their visits was unclear. All three were born in Britain to Pakistani parents, but their ancestral country is also home to Al Qaeda and other extremist Muslim groups.

Pakistani intelligence officials have said Tanweer stayed briefly at a religious school and met with a member of an outlawed militant group. Pakistani intelligence agents have questioned students, teachers and administrators at the school in Lahore, and at least two other Al Qaeda-linked radical Islamic centers.

NBC News reported Monday that Western intelligence officials told the network that an Al Qaeda operative in U.S. custody, Mohammed Junad Babar, told interrogators he took Khan to a terrorist training camp in Pakistan during a previous visit.

On Tuesday, Prime Minister Tony Blair was set to meet with Muslim leaders, along with political officials, to try to forge a common, united front against Islamic extremism. Conservative party leader Michael Howard (search) and Liberal Democrat leader Charles Kennedy (search) were to attend.

The Sunday Times, quoting unidentified American officials, said U.S. intelligence had warned Britain that the fourth July 7 bomber, Jamaican-born Germaine Lindsay (search), 19, was on a terror watch list but MI5 failed to monitor him.

However, a U.S. law enforcement official told the AP on Monday he was unaware that Lindsay was on any U.S. lists of known or suspected terrorists. American authorities are reviewing intelligence and interviewing people already in custody to determine any connection to the bombers, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the investigation is continuing.

The best leads in the case so far had come from a combination of old-fashioned detective work and modern technology, with little apparent out-front assistance from the intelligence services, Shoebridge said.

Detectives identified the four suspected bombers within days of the attacks by scouring the bomb sites for physical clues and scrutinizing closed-circuit television footage. Crucial help came from Hussain's distraught mother, who phoned police to report her son missing.

Investigators hope to track down leads that will help them crack the network that aided — and perhaps recruited — the four bombers.

They expect more forensic evidence to come from the bombing sites and the homes they have raided in Leeds, northern England, home base of three of the suspects. Authorities are also questioning a man they have arrested.

"This investigation is in some respects going in reverse," Carnt said. "They actually know who did it, and now they're tracing back to learn who their associates were, who they met with, where they socialized."

Detectives reportedly found nine bombs in a car left at a train station parking lot in Luton, the hometown of Lindsay. They have also reportedly uncovered extremist literature in the Leeds homes and another residence in Aylesbury, northwest of London, and are examining computers seized from those houses.

Police in Leeds continued their investigation of an Islamic book shop, the Iqra Learning Centre. Tanweer and Hussain both lived in Leeds, as did biochemist Magdy Mahmoud Mustafa el-Nashar (search), a former Leeds University instructor arrested in Egypt as part of the investigation.

Egypt's leading pro-government newspaper, Al-Ahram, quoted an unidentified security source as saying el-Nashar told investigators he rented a house to Hussain. British police searched el-Nashar's Leeds home after reportedly finding traces of explosives in his bathtub.

El-Nashar reportedly has denied involvement in the London bombings, and Egyptian security officials have said the country is not prepared to hand him over to Britain.
Link


Britain
Tory vice chair backs talks with Islamic extremists
2005-07-19
Tony Blair needs to consider holding talks with Islamic extremists in the wake of the London bombings, the Conservative's Muslim vice-chair says.
Sayeeda Warsi says Mr Blair should follow the example of ministers' engagement with IRA representatives.

Ms Warsi joined Tory leader Michael Howard at a meeting with Mr Blair and Muslim leaders in Downing Street.

Speaking outside No 10 she said the government was "in denial" about the causes of the bombings on 7 July.

Liberal Democrat leader Charles Kennedy and other MPs also attended the talks to discuss how to respond to the London bombings.

Mr Blair was asking how young Britons became suicide bombers and offering support to leaders who expose problems in their communities.

He says this type of "evil within the Muslim community" can only be "defeated by the community itself".

But Ms Warsi, who lives in Dewsbury, near to the family of Mohammad Sidique Khan - thought to be the Edgware Road bomber - says that is a policy doomed to failure.

"I live round the corner from the mother-in-law of the alleged bomber in Dewsbury - I have known the family most of my life - and that's why I am worried about Blair's stance," she told the BBC News website.

"I would never have known this particular individual had any links to these atrocities, so when you say this is something that the Muslim community needs to weed out, or deal with, that is a very dangerous step to take.

"It is the role of the police and the security services to deal with the security of this country.

"What they will get is complete cooperation and support from the Muslim community, but it must be security services and police led.

"If they say the Muslim community must deal with it, I think they will fail in that, not through a lack of commitment or desire, but because these people are so difficult to detect.

"If you are going to commit such an atrocity, you are not going to go round telling people what you are doing.

"These young men lead very normal lives - they have families, children, jobs and they are educated, so I think it is a very hard task."

Instead Ms Warsi, 34, who failed to win the Dewsbury seat from Labour at the general election, says Mr Blair should consider talking to the very people he believes are linked to the London bombings.

"We must start engaging with, not agreeing with, the radical groups who we have said in the past are complete nutters," she said.

"We need to bring these groups into the fold of the democratic process. As long as we exclude them and don't hear them out, we will allow them to continue their hate.

"It may not achieve results immediately, but it may stop the immediate violence."

Ms Warsi says talks with representatives of Sinn Fein/IRA helped stem the violence in Northern Ireland.

"And what we have seen so recently in Kashmir is when the two sides [India and Pakistan] engage in dialogue, the level of violence decreases," she said.

Ms Warsi says she hopes the government will engage with Muslims from all ethnic groups and sects, and encourage a basic level of training for Imams in mosques.

"We must deal with the disenfranchised youth, the men, in our community. We must do that by regulating what is being taught and who it is being taught by and that will include potential immigration controls on Imams and speakers from outside Britain."

Ms Warsi says while there is "no linkage per say" between the Iraq war and the London bombings, there were many issues, like the abuse of Iraqi prisoners at Abu Graib jail and the background of Guantanamo Bay that were happening at the same time.

"Although the government may not accept that these were the causes for 7 July, to go into denial mode is not the way forward. We must have a constructive debate," she said.

She added: "When you have got Chatham House saying Iraq was a contributing factor we have to be brave enough to say, hey, maybe it did have a contributing factor."
Link


Britain
Blair sets 5 May as election date
2005-04-05
The general election will be held on 5 May, Tony Blair has formally announced. Speaking after asking the Queen to dissolve Parliament next week, Mr Blair said Labour had a "driving mission" for a third term in office. The Conservative and Liberal Democrat leaders pre-empted the announcement by starting nationwide tours of key seats. Michael Howard accused Mr Blair's government of "losing the plot" while Charles Kennedy said he would focus on people's hopes, not their fears.
Mr Blair told reporters in Downing Street the election presented a "big choice". "The British people are the boss and they are the ones that will make it," he said. The Labour leader said he wanted to "entrench" economic stability and public services' investments, as well as ensuring people from all backgrounds could achieve their potential. He then headed off by helicopter to make a speech in Weymouth, Dorset - part of Labour's most marginal seat.
Earlier, Labour's candidate in Ribble Valley, Stephen Wilkinson, said he was defecting to the Lib Dems.
Four opinion polls published on Tuesday suggest Labour's lead over the Tories has slipped to between 2% and 5%. They suggest the Lib Dems trail the Tories by between 10 and 16 points. But one of the polls also suggests the Tories are 5% ahead of Labour among those "certain to vote".
With the campaign under way, ministers must rush to get outstanding legislation through Parliament before it winds up, probably on Friday. It will be formally dissolved on Monday. Backroom horse trading is happening between the parties over which bills of legislation can still be passed. Commons Leader Peter Hain said he hoped 16 bills - more than half the number announced in last year's Queen's Speech - would have been passed before Parliament adjourned. Mr Hain said plans for a new offence of incitement to religious hatred looked set to be lost. The Tories say plans for identity cards are another "likely casualty".
But ministers reached a compromise to save plans to overhaul gambling laws by cutting the number of regional "super casinos" allowed from eight to one.

'Action or talk?'

As he launched his party's campaign in London, Conservative leader Michael Howard said voters faced a "clear choice". "They can either reward Mr Blair for eight years of broken promises and vote for another five years of talk. Or they can vote Conservative to support a party that has taken a stand and is committed to action on the issues that matter." Mr Howard later visited Sale and Birmingham, where there was a minor scuffle as Labour activists with anti-Conservative banners were manhandled away by Tory workers.
Lib Dem leader Charles Kennedy has visited Manchester, Newcastle, Leeds and Edinburgh on a whistle-stop tour of key seats to begin his campaign. He told BBC News the election was "much more fluid" than ever before. He promised to shun his rivals' "negative campaigning". "I'm not going to spend the next month just talking Britain down," he added.

Wales and Scotland

Plaid Cymru MP Elfyn Llywd said his party was the real opposition in Wales and there was no real difference between Labour and Tories. Scottish National Party leader Alex Salmond said his campaign would focus on making Scotland matter to the election. The Green Party said it was fielding 25% more candidates at this election on a "People, Planet, Peace" slogan. The UK Independence Party said it was the only party who believed the UK should govern itself, independent of European Union controls.
Link


Britain
Lib-Dems demand Iraq exit strategy
2005-03-06
LONDON: The leader of the opposition Liberal Democrats criticised the government yesterday for its handling of the Iraq war, and demanded an exit strategy for British forces. In a keynote speech at his party's conference, Charles Kennedy urged voters to choose the Liberal Democrats over Prime Minister Tony Blair's Labour Party and Britain's largest opposition group, the Conservative Party, during a national election expected on May 5.

"Tony Blair took us to war in Iraq on the basis of the supposed threat of Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction," Kennedy said in Harrogate, a city in northern England. When the weapons couldn't be found, Blair then switched to saying that the reason for the war was the removal of Saddam, Kennedy said. "Of course Britain should honour its legal and moral responsibilities with regard to the situation in Iraq. But we need to focus on a proper exit strategy - as we warned at the outset. That should mean a phased withdrawal of British troops to coincide with the end of the United Nations mandate this year."
UN mandate?
Link


Britain
Britain's Lib Dems would give prisoners the vote (but, shh, it's supposed to be a secret)
2005-03-03
File under 'Bankruptcies, Political'
The Liberal Democrat leader Charles Kennedy faced criticism yesterday after he confirmed that he would give the vote to convicted prisoners. In an admission that may affect his party's so-called "tough liberalism" approach to crime, Mr Kennedy said even Ian Huntley, the Soham killer, should get the vote. "We believe that citizens are citizens, full stop," he said during questions on Channel Five television. Under the present rules all people sent to prison are automatically deprived of the vote. Labour seized on Mr Kennedy's remarks as "crazy political correctness". Later, Mr Kennedy appeared to backtrack on his comments when a spokesman said the policy would not be part of the election manifesto. But another spokesman said the proposal remained Liberal Democrat policy, and claimed that about 20 Labour MPs had signed a Commons early day motion in favour of giving prisoners the vote.
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-12 More