| Submit your comments on this article |
| Government Corruption |
| Some interesting sidenotes to Larry Sinclair's tale of sex and drugs with Obama |
| 2023-09-08 |
| [AmericanThinker] Last night, Tucker Carlson released his interview with Larry Sinclair, the man who alleges that, in 1999, while in Chicago, he did cocaine with Obama (who preferred to smoke his) and then performed oral sex on Obama. This is a tale that Sinclair has told before. It’s worth noting because it reminds us of the partnership between the media and the Democrat party. There were also some interesting details about big tech and a strange death (or maybe a few strange deaths). As I said, nothing new. However, I found it very amusing when, after hearing Sinclair detail how he shared drugs with Obama and performed oral sex on him, Tucker asked Sinclair if that left a bad taste in his mouth, and Sinclair said that it did. Tucker and Sinclair were obviously speaking about the entire two-day interlude, from first meeting Obama to never seeing the man again, but I can be remarkably literal and, well, you get the joke. "It left a bad taste in my mouth" There were two interesting parts of the interview with which I was not familiar. The first was Sinclair’s discussion about how the media and big tech went after him. Some media outlets lied about Sinclair’s criminal history (which he’d been quite open about in the YouTube video he originally made), grossly exaggerating it, and then dismissed him as a criminal and a crackpot. Read the rest at the link |
| Posted by:The Walking Unvaxed |
| #9 As a story, it sounded plausible if you remove Barrack Obama’s name. At this point the story is uncorroborated. The Clinton rape stories all were plausible as well. By plausible, I mean that the narrative doesn’t go Jussie Smollett or Kavanaugh accuser. Regardless, I think we are going to get to the bottom of some stuff over the next couple of months and then more in the next six years. |
| Posted by: Bill Clunk5073 2023-09-08 16:55 |
| #8 I had enough problems with Baraq before I ever heard Sinclair's story. He has no witnesses or evidence but he does have a history of lies and legal problems which makes me wonder why Tucker would bother with him. |
| Posted by: Abu Uluque 2023-09-08 13:46 |
| #7 ^ And I don't need to hear about it around the clock, have it up in my face all the time and I certainly don't need gummint clubbing me over the head to validate it. If those "life choices" are so superior, that should speak for itself, eh? |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2023-09-08 07:59 |
| #6 I could give a damn who sleeps with what, as long as it doesn't involve children or the livestock. |
| Posted by: Mercutio 2023-09-08 07:54 |
| #5 I think the important aspect isn't the veracity of the accuser, it's that the citizens get to decide whether we believe him or not and what that ultimately means in terms of our decisions going forward. Is Portnoy right? No idea, but he makes good points as does Lord Garth. In the end none of us were 'there', thank God, and we have to make our own judgements. You know, like they did in the old, pre-woke days. Try and cobble some combination of such facts as can be gleaned, add in human experience and legitimate operating assumptions. Censorship is the problem, not Sinclair, Tucker, or even the pestilential light bringer. |
| Posted by: Cesare 2023-09-08 07:39 |
| #4 And the folks frequenting the bars in Chicago's Pride district just smile, never telling tales about 'one of their own'. |
| Posted by: Mullah Richard 2023-09-08 07:20 |
| #2 They didn’t call him Bath House Barry for nothing… |
| Posted by: Itsoktobewhite 2023-09-08 01:02 |
| #1 Mr Sinclair has a long history of tangles with the law. He also has no physical evidence to back up any of his claims. |
| Posted by: lord garth 2023-09-08 00:28 |