You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
Shocker: 96% of U.S. climate data is corrupted-96% of these stations are corrupted by localized effects of urbanization – producing heat-bias because of their close proximity to asphalt, machinery, and other heat-producing, heat-trapping...
2023-06-11
[HotAir]
Posted by:NoMoreBS

#7  producing heat-bias because of their close proximity to that hot little puppet Greta.
Posted by: Skidmark   2023-06-11 14:31  

#6  This has been pointed out for years as the surface temps have been rising according to the Powers That Beâ„¢, but the satellite data is showing no temperature rise.
Posted by: DarthVader   2023-06-11 14:09  

#5  corrupted by localized effects of urbanization

This has been pointed out for at least 20 years. Climate change proponents (won't call them climatologists) love to "normalize" data to get the results they want. How fortunate urban heat center data readings come already pre-normalized.
Posted by: Enver Slager8035   2023-06-11 14:05  

#4  Can't lie their way to the truth.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2023-06-11 14:05  

#3  Almost as corrupt as our Federal Government.
Posted by: Super Hose   2023-06-11 14:00  

#2  96% of these stations are corrupted by localized effects of urbanization

Watts Up With That? (Anthony Watts) has been demonstrating these data collection errors for years.

Finally Hot Air (and potentially others) might actually be paying attention....somewhat.
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2023-06-11 13:12  

#1  So the shocker is that it is only 96%? Is that right?
Posted by: Tom   2023-06-11 13:03  

00:00