You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Great Cultural Revolution
FDA: 'Vaccines Do Not Require Demonstration of the Prevention of Infection or Transmission'
2023-04-29
[PJMEDIA] The now years-long Public Health™ campaign continues to reinvent the definition of "vaccine" in the service of accommodating Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA injections. These shots utilize the genetic manipulation of cells to produce spike proteins rather than introducing an inactivated sample of the virus to induce an adaptive immune response — the mechanism of every vaccine in recorded history.

The Animal Farm pigs did the same trick when they rewrote the Seven Commandments in the dark of night to excuse their abhorrent behavior.

"Vaccines do not require demonstration of the prevention of infection or transmission," according to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) official Dr. Peter Marks in a newly released memo.

Via Epoch Times:

Marks was writing as he rejected nearly all recommendations from a group of experts that advised the FDA to update the labels for the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines.

Vaccines are traditionally known as drugs that prevent an illness. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for years said a vaccine is a product that "produces immunity" while vaccination is an injection of an infectious organism "in order to prevent the disease." The agency changed its definitions after people correctly noted that COVID-19 vaccines do not prevent infection.

The FDA letter came as a response to a January 2023 petition from the Coalition Advocating for Adequately Labeled Medicines to force the mRNA COVID shot manufacturers to "amend current product labeling" to reflect the reality that the shots do not stop transmission, infection, or confer herd immunity — all of which Americans were propagandized to believe by NIAID head Anthony Fauci, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, corporate media talking heads, and President Brandon himself.



This brand of scientific revisionism is not new for anyone who has been paying attention over the past three years.

In September 2021, the CDC, the FDA’s partner in crime, quietly adjusted the definition of "vaccine," reported The Miami Herald:

Social media is calling bluff on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for modifying its definition of the words "vaccine" and "vaccination" on its website.

Before the change, the definition for "vaccination" read, "the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease." Now, the word "immunity" has been switched to "protection."

Obviously, had the American population been treated to the truth about the COVID-19 shots from the start — that they don’t prevent anyone from getting sick or getting others sick (which was the entire Public Health™ justification for mandates) — they wouldn’t have rolled up their sleeves at nearly the same rate.

Posted by:746

#20  My prayers for her full recovery, Abu Ga. I know how devastating it is for all involved when one goes suddenly from active to not. The song says, “It’s better to burn out than it is to rust,” but doesn’t address what it’s like to unexpectedly do both at once.
Posted by: trailing wife   2023-04-29 22:50  

#19  My sympathies, Abu
Posted by: Frank G   2023-04-29 19:12  

#18  Someone spelled Dr. Marx's name wrong.
Posted by: Pheling Sligum6276   2023-04-29 16:37  

#17  So sorry to hear that, Abu. Horrible and infuriating.
Posted by: DooDahMan   2023-04-29 15:00  

#16  my wife who was a healthy and active 38 yr old at the time with no family history of heart disease or clotting disorders had a stroke 11 days after getting the "vaccine" as was required by her employer.

None of the specialists who she has seen thinks that is a coincidence. The fact she also turned up with kidney damage believed to be related to clotting seems odd as well since again, no family history.
Posted by: Abu Ga   2023-04-29 14:34  

#15  Neil Cavuto, M.D., is/has been another reason not to watch Fox.
Posted by: DooDahMan   2023-04-29 13:54  

#14  #11 - I still remember Cavuto's hysterical screaming after Trump mentioned Hydroxychloroquine: "I cannot stress enough. This will kill you. "
Posted by: Frank G   2023-04-29 13:15  

#13  ^^^ Forgot to add this: And that goes for Fox, too.
Posted by: DooDahMan   2023-04-29 12:35  

#12  RFK, Jr., wrote that expose on Saint Fauci, big gum'ment and big pharma circled the wagons.

Besides, the networks can't have any opposing views towards companies (advertisers) that give them big money in advertising revenue. "Brought to you by Pfizer".
Posted by: DooDahMan   2023-04-29 12:34  

#11  Neil Cavuto overtalked and shut him down, too.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2023-04-29 12:32  

#10  ABC edits interview with Biden challenger RFK Jr. to remove 'false claims' about COVID vaccines: Network admits cutting remarks about link between the shot and autism

This is no surprise. Network news, cable news and newspapers only tell one side of the story. They are NOT journalists, they are propagandists. The best remedy for them is to turn off the damn TV and cancel the newspaper subscription.

Posted by: Abu Uluque   2023-04-29 12:06  

#9  Now, the word "immunity" has been switched to "protection."

Oh, yeah? Like what protection?

How much protection?

What scientific data do you have to prove it provides any protection at all?

When will CDC and FDA have to backtrack on this claim as well?

And then, how will they justify continued use of these co-called vaccines?

Why can't we just have quinine?
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2023-04-29 12:00  

#8  Funny how the definition of a vaccine keeps changing:

Posted by: DooDahMan   2023-04-29 11:59  

#7  They are called the Center for Disease Control. That is what they are paid to do. They can try to edit a wiki to hide their abysmal failure to do their job, but only the evil and stupid people will buy in.
Posted by: Super Hose   2023-04-29 11:53  

#6  "Vaccines do not require demonstration of the prevention of infection or transmission,"

My Gin & Tonic is a vaccine.

Eating your fingernails is a vaccine.

Doing wave things with your hand out of the car's window is a vaccine.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2023-04-29 11:05  

#5  maybe two nights ago...
Posted by: 746   2023-04-29 10:01  

#4  ABC edits interview with Biden challenger RFK Jr. to remove 'false claims' about COVID vaccines: Network admits cutting remarks about link between the shot and autism
Posted by: Skidmark   2023-04-29 08:54  

#3  /\ I believe this is still an experimental 'vaccine'.

The "experiment" does not appear to be going well.
Posted by: Besoeker   2023-04-29 08:40  

#2  Protection? I was triple-jabbed when I caught it and my wife was quadruple jabbed when she caught it a second time.

Reduces your risk of serious complications? Where's the science to support that claim? Just how would one construct a study to demonstrate that? How long would it take?

[shakes head] I was born at night, but not last night. I believe this is still an experimental 'vaccine'.
Posted by: Bobby   2023-04-29 08:31  

#1  When I read authoritative quotes like this by persons placed in positions that look after our health and safety.

I have to ask.
Why do they still hold that position?
Seriously, it has to make whoever and/or whatever political party placed them in power, look like total idiots?

Or does their voter base also equal their thinking?

Posted by: NN2N1   2023-04-29 08:27  

00:00