| Submit your comments on this article |
| Europe |
| Russian Invasion of Ukraine Revolutionizes NATO Military Strategy |
| 2023-04-18 |
| [NYT] Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the costliest conflict in Europe since World War II, has propelled the North Atlantic Treaty Organization into a full-throttled effort to make itself again into the capable, war-fighting alliance it had been during the Cold War. Vlad Putin, Sooper Genius The shift is transformative for an alliance characterized for decades by hibernation and self-doubt. After the recent embrace of long-neutral Finland by the alliance, it also amounts to another significant unintended consequence for Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin, of his war. NATO is rapidly moving from what the military calls deterrence by retaliation to deterrence by denial. In the past, the theory was that if the Russians invaded, member states would try to hold on until allied forces, mainly American and based at home, could come to their aid and retaliate against the Russians to try to push them back. But after the Russian atrocities in areas it occupied in Ukraine, from Bucha and Irpin to Mariupol and Kherson, frontier states like Poland and the Baltic countries no longer want to risk any period of Russian occupation. They note that in the first days of the Ukrainian invasion, Russian troops took land larger than some Baltic nations. To prevent that, to deter by denial, means a revolution in practical terms: more troops based permanently along the Russian border, more integration of American and allied war plans, more military spending and more detailed requirements for allies to have specific kinds of forces and equipment to fight, if necessary, in pre-assigned places. Mr. Putin has long complained about NATO encirclement and encroachment. But his invasion of Ukraine provoked the alliance to shed remaining inhibitions about increased numbers of Western troops all along NATO’s border with Russia. The intention is to make NATO’s forces not only more robust and more capable but also more visible to Russia, a key element of deterrence. "The debate is no longer about how much is too much," for fear of upsetting Moscow, "but how much is enough," said Camille Grand, until recently NATO’s assistant secretary general for defense investment, and now with the European Council on Foreign Relations. |
| Posted by:Helmuth, Speaking for Sholugum4538 |
| #7 What NATO strategy currently is, is the Poles and Baltics wondering how fast Germany will sell them out if the shooting starts. |
| Posted by: ed in texas 2023-04-18 09:33 |
| #6 Forward defense was also the strategy adopted by NATO in the late 1970's. The German's didn't appreciate being occupied by the Soviets before NATO got its act together. Today Poland and the Baltics feel the same about the Russians. |
| Posted by: Helmuth, Speaking for Sholugum4538 2023-04-18 07:59 |
| #5 The NYT is still telling us the Russians are losing. Sad state of affairs our journalism in this country is. |
| Posted by: Bill Greans6336 2023-04-18 07:33 |
| #4 NATO has a strategy? |
| Posted by: Cesare 2023-04-18 07:33 |
| #3 Small sentences |
| Posted by: Frank G 2023-04-18 07:04 |
| #2 Years to develop. Many including USA troops in Ukraine. Going broke doing so. Unintended consequences beyond their comprehension. Zombie drudged troops. When reality has no meaning. Elites will just continue to bleed off the monies. |
| Posted by: Dale 2023-04-18 04:03 |
| #1 shed remaining inhibitions about increased numbers of |
| Posted by: Skidmark 2023-04-18 00:32 |