You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Land of the Free
Let the United States Supreme Court know how you feel.
2020-11-10
Posted by:Besoeker

#11  I'm almost afraid to. Get rid of that slob Roberts and I might be able to write a kind note.
Posted by: Clem   2020-11-10 18:02  

#10  If not shenanigans, the court system may be swamped right now.

In any case, a link without superfluous code would be:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/contact/contact_pio.aspx
Posted by: cingold   2020-11-10 17:56  

#9  One of many possible examples under the subject of election fraud:

Honorable Justices and Chief Justice Robert:

With complete respect, I hope this Honorable Court will take judicial notice of both;

1) the fact that in these United States of America prompt and efficient vote recounts and challenges are part of our election process — ensuring FULL and FAIR elections for centuries; and

2) that the restraint displayed by the American people does not reflect a lack of rage or storied indomitable spirit in the face of clear and convincing widespread systemic determinative federal law violations in the most recent Presidential Election.

Respectfully submitted,

XX XXX
Private Citizen
Posted by: cingold   2020-11-10 17:33  

#8  If I were writing the justices, and I’m fairly confident that liberals will be inundating the justices and it might be nice to balance that out—just for sake of argument, I would probably address the letter like:

Honorable Justices and Chief Justice Robert:

How to Write to The US Supreme Court Justices

How to Address Justices and Judges in Your Correspondence


Just sayin’ . . .
Posted by: cingold   2020-11-10 17:17  

#7  Letting everyone involved know you are paying attention is well within rights, if not civic duty.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2020-11-10 12:23  

#6  The reality is that SCOTUS is cognizant of public opinion. The ideal is as NN2N1 said. Lifetime appointments were supposed to lend some stability and immunity from public opinion. This didn't necessarily occur as both parties try to shape the court system.

Ideally, the Constitution should be the guide for SCOTUS. It provides the needed stability for the Court.
Posted by: JohnQC   2020-11-10 12:08  

#5  Respectfully submitted.
Posted by: DarthVader   2020-11-10 09:47  

#4  

If it were not the SCOTUS, I would support this type of action to my politicians. At the least they are greedy enough to know they need votes to get elected.

But the SCOTUS should only sit in judgement based on the US Constitution, not Public or political agendas.

I never want my Constitutional Rights and my day in court based on the whim of a fickle constantly changing Public Opinion, a MOB, or some political party's latest agenda.
Posted by: NN2N1   2020-11-10 07:07  

#3  Done... and without any nominative modifiers.
Posted by: Mercutio   2020-11-10 07:06  

#2  You want to send a message? Tell your friends and family to withhold their children from the DoD recruiters. Dry up their replacement pool from the very population that the government now considers their enemy.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2020-11-10 06:56  

#1  Thank you.
Posted by: Dale   2020-11-10 06:20  

00:00