| Submit your comments on this article |
| Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
If it's indeed true that Iranians fired conventional ballistic missiles at U.S. targets, it would be unprecedented |
| 2020-01-08 |
[PUBLISH.TWITTER]
|
| Posted by:Fred |
| #6 Unprecedented might mean even Putin wasn't willing to sell missiles to Iran until Obama was President. |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2020-01-08 15:05 |
| #5 what is perhaps unprecedented is that Iran took credit for the attacks in real time e.g., in the case of the Saudi oil fields hit, Iran denied that they did it and claimed their Yemen proxies did it. |
| Posted by: lord garth 2020-01-08 12:29 |
| #4 Unprecedented? 1. the missiles fired 2. the missiles hit a target |
| Posted by: Skidmark 2020-01-08 12:06 |
| #3 Unprecedented? Were they aiming for Saudi again and misaligned the launchers? |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2020-01-08 10:15 |
| #2 unprecedented of what? Saddam fired Scuds.. |
| Posted by: Spanky Whuter1088 2020-01-08 06:15 |
| #1 ..usually they use proxies in Iraq to shoot missiles for them since the Bush II era. Maybe no one in Iraq was available to answer the phone. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2020-01-08 00:44 |