You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Des Moines Register calls for audit of Iowa results: 'Something smells in the Democratic Party'
2016-02-05
[POLITICO] In a strongly worded editorial on Thursday, The Des Moines Register called on the Iowa Democratic Party to move quickly to prove that Monday's results are correct.

The piece titled "Editorial: Something smells in the Democratic Party," starts out: "Once again the world is laughing at Iowa."

It gets sharper from there. "What happened Monday night at the Democratic caucuses was a debacle, period. Democracy, particularly at the local party level, can be slow, messy and obscure. But the refusal to undergo scrutiny or allow for an appeal reeks of autocracy," the DMR reads. "The Iowa Democratic Party must act quickly to assure the accuracy of the caucus results, beyond a shadow of a doubt."

The editorial cites Clinton's razor-thin victory as too close "not to do a complete audit of results."

The newspaper editorial also said there were too many opportunities for error to arise.

"Too many accounts have arisen of inconsistent counts, untrained and overwhelmed volunteers, confused voters, cramped precinct locations, a lack of voter registration forms and other problems," the editorial reads. "Too many of us, including members of the Register editorial board who were observing caucuses, saw opportunities for error amid Monday night's chaos."

The editorial ends by calling on the state's Democratic Party to "work with all the campaigns to audit results. Break silly party tradition and release the raw vote totals. Provide a list of each precinct coin flip and its outcome, as well as other information sought by the Register. Be transparent."
The state Democratic Party, of course, ignored them...
There's a reason those back rooms are smoke filled.
Posted by:Fred

#11  Depends
Posted by: Procopius2k   2016-02-05 16:04  

#10  Yes. Used . . . .
Posted by: gorb   2016-02-05 13:26  

#9  Smells of Preparation H! ?
Posted by: swksvolFF   2016-02-05 13:01  

#8  "..reminds me of something I occasionally pick up on my boot from the gutter. Very unpleasant on a hot day" Col. Kurt Steiner
Posted by: Rex Mundi   2016-02-05 12:35  

#7  What I want to know is how did they get the dead people to vote?
Posted by: Sven the pelter   2016-02-05 12:22  

#6  "Too many accounts have arisen of inconsistent counts, untrained and overwhelmed volunteers, confused voters, cramped precinct locations, a lack of voter registration forms and other problems"

Standard operating procedure when Democrats are involved. Nothing to see here.... move along...
Posted by: CrazyFool   2016-02-05 11:45  

#5  "Too many accounts have arisen of inconsistent counts, untrained and overwhelmed volunteers, confused voters, cramped precinct locations, a lack of voter registration forms and other problems"

Those aren't bugs. Those are features.

Posted by: Pappy   2016-02-05 09:03  

#4  "Once again the world is laughing at Iowa."
Was there another reason you placed yourself at the head of the line?
Posted by: ed in texas   2016-02-05 08:23  

#3  Iowa's caucus rules were for a different era, that is, when the caucus was a forum for neighbors to meet and discuss before making their choice known.

Its long past time to go to a primary system with secret ballots.
Posted by: lord garth   2016-02-05 08:07  

#2  A long and distinguished record.

It's all a facade and ritual to keep the rubes paying their taxes and sacrificing their young to keep them in power.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2016-02-05 08:01  

#1  "like old fish"
Posted by: Frank G   2016-02-05 05:40  

00:00