| Submit your comments on this article |
| China-Japan-Koreas |
| Chinese General Says U.S. Foreign Policy Has 'Erectile Dysfunction' Problems |
| 2014-06-04 |
| He [Maj. Gen Zhu Chenghu, a professor at the National Defense University] suggested that if China came to blows with any of its neighbors, the U.S. might not be a reliable ally. I'll just leave it at that. |
| Posted by:Uncle Phester |
| #10 I blame the general's accent. He was actually speaking about US election fraud. |
| Posted by: Gravilet Angitle2487 2014-06-04 20:41 |
| #9 Strikes that this general has a lot of experience with erectile dysfunction. |
| Posted by: Squinty 2014-06-04 18:29 |
| #8 Remember, if they just so happen to erect a foreign policy that lasts more than four hours, call the doctor. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2014-06-04 17:48 |
| #7 Surprises me that that they say anything that might lead to patriotic americans voting for folks with a more 'erect' foreign policy. |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2014-06-04 14:26 |
| #6 The ChiCom general is calling the empty suit a limp-dicked wienie. Works for me, it's about time someone called it for what it is... |
| Posted by: Bill Clinton 2014-06-04 13:06 |
| #5 Implicit in this analogy is the idea that Obammer likes girls to begin with. I think that's where it's faulty. |
| Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain 2014-06-04 11:28 |
| #4 The two you mentioned would cause ED. |
| Posted by: Secret Asian Man 2014-06-04 08:20 |
| #3 Val-Jar, Rice, Hillary. How can there be any erectile in the dysfunction? Maybe p-envy, but no erectile. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2014-06-04 08:07 |
| #2 Maybe at this point our Chinese Foreign Policy would just rather have a talking frog? (It's the punch line of a joke...) |
| Posted by: BrerRabbit 2014-06-04 07:22 |
| #1 D *** NG IT, You call that "E.D." thing-am-a-jig E-tended D-eterrence??? gut nuthin. * CHINESE MILITARY FORUM > [HuffPo] WHY CHINA + US ARE HEADED TO A CATASTROPHIC CLASH. * CHINA DAILY > CHINA MAY CALL VIETNAM'S BLUFF + START A WAR: DUOWEI NEWS | REUTERS. I'm more concerned wid the PHIL front - China's new garrison in the SCS is directly across from the PHIL main island of LUZON. Besides denying use of Luzon's well-developed Air-Sea Ports [Subic, Clark, etc.] to the USDOD + aligned, the PLA needs Luzon to also extend the range of its anti-Naval/Carrier DF-21 ASBMS, + Heavy + Tac StrikeAir, + other LRBMS to deter any US intervening force coming in from EASTPAC. * TOPIX > [VOA News] CHINA PLANTED OIL RIG TO TEST VIETNAMESE RESOLVE. US = POTUS Bammer's resolve??? * GUAM PDN > [US] MILITARY MAY DEPLOY [reassign?] THAAD TO SOUTH KOREA, * JAPAN TIMES > OFFICIALS PUSH TO SCRAP LIMITS TO SDF MISSIONS. * IIRC SAME > OPINION: WHERE ARE THE SHIPS, PLANES FOR GUAM'S MARINES? Similarly, Where's the THAAD = GMD-TMD, SUPER-AEGIS??? IMO its as if the US CODEL of McCain + Levine are enticing China + PLA to attack + takeover GUAM-WESTPAC??? Under the Obama-the-Globalist, ... > RISING IRAN = extended its sphere to the coasts of the Eastern Med, Syria, + Iraq. > RUSSIA = has the Crimea back, + is making rapperochement wid its former WARSAW PACT satellite nations in eastern Europe, China, + non-India East-South Asia. This leaves RISING CHINA that still is still isolated to its border coasts, + needs to PCorrectly-Deniably expand its sphere. * FYI BRAZIL = as per FREEREPUBLIC + TOPIX, seems interested in dev as an AGRO-POWER. Its Brazil rival = alter-ego ARGENTINA that would like to be MilPol aggressive or bellicose, e.g. repor dev schemas to use Ocean-going tugs to intercept British oil rigs attempting to set up in the disputed Falklands. Lastly, * PHIL STAR [repost] > DESIGNS OF CHINA'S PLANNED MILITARY BASE ON MABINI REEF SURFACES. * DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > OBAMA CALLS PROTECTION OF EASTERN EUROPE "SACROSANCT" OBLIGATION FOR THE US. Ditto GUAM-WESTPAC? HAWAII? Goes to what the Bammer didn't say in the Artic. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2014-06-04 03:05 |