You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran Said Advancing 'At Murderous Pace,' Could Have Bomb By July
2013-03-31
[IsraelTimes] Iran could have the capability to build a nuclear bomb by July, unnamed security sources said in a report published Friday.

The sources added that Israel's leadership had been mollified by US President Barack Obama
I've now been in 57 states -- I think one left to go...
's visit earlier this month, which saw Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu seemingly cotton to Washington's later timeline on when Iran could have a nuclear bomb.

The security sources, said to be close to Netanyahu's talks with Obama, claimed that after seeing North Korea wield nuclear weapons despite heavy Western opposition, Tehran's leadership had also decided to break out toward the bomb, which could be ready between July and September.

"The Iranians aren't messing around after North Korea. What Kim Pudge Jong-un
...the hereditary potentate of North Korea...
has Ahmadinejad has," a source told the Israeli daily Maariv, referring to North Korea's and Iran's respective leaders. "At the end of 2012 the Iranians carried out a simulation of a nuclear kaboom and since then have been advancing at a murderous pace every day."

Last year, Netanyahu told the UN General Assembly that Iran could have the bomb by spring 2013, but Israeli officials have revised the assessment several times to later dates. Obama, who visited Israel last week to discuss cooperation on Iran, among other things, seemed to convince Netanyahu to go along with the US timeline, which holds that Iran is still a year away and has not yet decided to race full-speed to a nuclear weapon.

However,
a woman is only as old as she admits...
the sources said Obama's charm offensive had managed to "buy" Netanyahu -- and Israel ended up losing out, with Jerusalem's hands now tied on Iran.

"The president threw sand in our eyes and now we are reaping the storm," one source said. "They bought us with flattery and displays of friendship, but managed to evade any responsibility for a strike."

While Israel has pushed for a military option against Tehran's nuclear program, the US has maintained that time remains for diplomacy and sanctions to end the standoff. Netanyahu's statements during Obama's visit seemed to indicate Israel would not act without US backing, which many analysts say would be necessary for an effective attack.

Iran claims its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, but several rounds of talks over allowing in inspectors or curbing enrichment have yielded few results.
Posted by:trailing wife

#3  I suppos national + Shia pride is involved, but besides that Iran's BFF Pakistan is already Nuke-armed, + there is still mucho extant uncertainty over whether Iran bought Nukes on the Black Market(s0 after the collapse of the USSR, + how many andor what type. VARIOUS PERTS, NETTERS INSIST THAT IRAN PER SE IS ALREADY NUKE-ARMED.

The prob is high that any Persian Gulf/ME conflict between the US, etal. + Iran [includ Syria?] will correspondingly occur wid a a mil conflict in East Asia e.g. Sino-Japanese islands dispute, China-vs-ASEAN in SCS, + now DPRK = China again? WILL THE DEBT, SEQUESTER-RIDDEN US = OBAMA ADMIN + USDOD BE CAPABLE OF FIGHTING A MULTI-FRONT WAR WHERE THERE IS RISK OF NUCLEAR CONFRONTATION + COMBAT???

Lest we fergit, MSM-NET > CHINA = would like to see US power-n-influence contained or isolated to EASTPAC [West Coast + Hawaii] come Year 2020 or ASAP AMAP after.

Presum that no side desires to wage a full-scale Mutually Destructive Strategic NucWar, IMO the only way for CHINA to achieve the above is for the [Debt,Sequester-ridden] US to either be militarily defeated by Same + Aligned? in a major East Asian mil conflict, Conventional-forces only or ala Limited Nuclear/TacNuke; or for the US to make unilateral concessions to China for the sake of peace + mutual State continuity. CHINA OF COURSE CAN UNILATER AMEND OR DELAY ITS "POST-US", "FUTURE "WORLD #1", "MANIFEST DESTINY", BUT WORLD HISTORY SUGGESTS THAT IS HIGHLY UNLIKELY AS NEW OR RESURGENT STATES DESIRE TO ACHIEVE THEIR MILPOL = GEOPOL AGENDUM ASAP.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2013-03-31 20:09  

#2  You have experience making mistakes building nuclear bombs quickly?
Posted by: Glenmore   2013-03-31 15:27  

#1  It's been my experience that one should make haste slowly when engaged in this type of work.
Posted by: Skidmark   2013-03-31 15:15  

00:00