You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
ISI Tells Taliban Not To Negotiate?
2010-08-23
I am unsure about this- salt to taste:
Pakistan's military spy agency ISI has warned the Taliban not to open negotiations with the Hamid Karzai regime or the US without its permission.

Quoting top Pakistani security officials, New York Times said that the Taliban leaders have been warned against carrying out free-lance negotiations, where Islamabad is excluded.

"The message from the ISI is: no flirting," the paper said quoting a western diplomat.
GoogleNews couldn't find that phrase at the Times.
Times said the warnings from the ISI to Taliban come in the backdrop of new reports that Pakistani intelligence had used CIA to capture the Taliban No 2 Mulla Abdul Ghani Baradar from the port city of Karachi in last January because they wanted to shut down secret talks that militia leaders had been conducting with Afghan government that excluded Pakistan.

The paper said in the weeks after Baradar's capture, Pakistani security officials had detained as many as 23 Taliban leaders, many of whom had been enjoying the protection of Pakistan government for years.

But now, Times said, the Taliban leaders who were detained had been set free to fight US forces again inside Afghanistan. Among those released include Mullah Qayoom Zakir, Abdul Kabir and Abdul Rauf Khadeem.

"We picked up Baradar and others because they were trying to make a deal without us," Times quoted a senior Pakistani security official as saying.

"We protect the Taliban. They are dependent on us. We are not going to allow them to make a deal with Karzai and the Indians," the official told the paper.
That sounds like the ISI.
Times said, the account now being offered in Islamabad on Baradar's arrest highlights Pakistan's policy on Afghanistan: retaining decisive influence over the Taliban, thwarting arch enemy India and putting Pakistan in a position to shape Afghanistan post war political order.
Posted by:Free Radical

#6  Predators need to "accidentally" take out Guls home with him in it.

Next a B2 on a mission to Afghanistan needs a bomb bay failure right over ISI HQ.

Sorry!!

Posted by: Water Modem   2010-08-23 22:22  

#5  ...same reason we subsidize the Chicago, Massachusetts, New Jersey mob machines.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2010-08-23 11:31  

#4  And we fund the Pak army because?
Posted by: Paul2   2010-08-23 10:31  

#3  "As always, should you or any of your IM Force Taliban be caught or killed, the Secretary will disavow any knowledge of your actions"
Posted by: Procopius2k   2010-08-23 10:27  

#2  Don't Negotiate, just kill them all, or use the chinese form of negotiation, a single pistol shot to the head.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2010-08-23 09:58  

#1  Update: confirmed. See the NYT story posted here.
Posted by: Free Radical   2010-08-23 09:49  

00:01