You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Cover of Time Magazine
2010-08-03
The Taliban pounded on the door just before midnight, demanding that Aisha, 18, be punished for running away from her husband's house. Her in-laws treated her like a slave, Aisha pleaded. They beat her. If she hadn't run away, she would have died. Her judge, a local Taliban commander, was unmoved. Aisha's brother-in-law held her down while her husband pulled out a knife. First he sliced off her ears. Then he started on her nose.

This didn't happen 10 years ago, when the Taliban ruled Afghanistan. It happened last year. Now hidden in a secret women's shelter in Kabul, Aisha listens obsessively to the news. Talk that the Afghan government is considering some kind of political accommodation with the Taliban frightens her. "They are the people that did this to me," she says, touching her damaged face. "How can we reconcile with them?"

In June, Afghan President Hamid Karzai established a peace council tasked with exploring negotiations with the Taliban. A month later, Tom Malinowski from Human Rights Watch met Karzai. During their conversation, Karzai mused on the cost of the conflict in human lives and wondered aloud if he had any right to talk about human rights when so many were dying. "He essentially asked me," says Malinowski, "What is more important, protecting the right of a girl to go to school or saving her life?" How Karzai and his international allies answer that question will have far-reaching consequences, not only for Afghanistan's women, but the country as a whole.

As the war in Afghanistan enters its ninth year, the need for an exit strategy weighs on the minds of U.S. policymakers. Such an outcome, it is assumed, would involve reconciliation with the Taliban. But Afghan women fear that in the quest for a quick peace, their progress may be sidelined. "Women's rights must not be the sacrifice by which peace is achieved," says parliamentarian Fawzia Koofi.

Yet that may be where negotiations are heading. The Taliban will be advocating a version of an Afghan state in line with their own conservative views, particularly on the issue of women's rights. Already there is a growing acceptance that some concessions to the Taliban are inevitable if there is to be genuine reconciliation. "You have to be realistic," says a diplomat in Kabul. "We are not going to be sending troops and spending money forever. There will have to be a compromise, and sacrifices will have to be made."

For Afghanistan's women, an early withdrawal of international forces could be disastrous. An Afghan refugee who grew up in Canada, Mozhdah Jamalzadah recently returned home to launch an Oprah-style talk show in which she has been able to subtly introduce questions of women's rights without provoking the ire of religious conservatives. On a recent episode, a male guest told a joke about a foreign human-rights team in Afghanistan. In the cities, the team noticed that women walked six paces behind their husbands. But in rural Helmand, where the Taliban is strongest, they saw a woman six steps ahead. The foreigners rushed to congratulate the husband on his enlightenment -- only to be told that he stuck his wife in front because they were walking through a minefield. As the audience roared with laughter, Jamalzadah reflected that it may take about 10 to 15 years before Afghan women can truly walk alongside men. But once they do, she believes, all Afghans will benefit. "When we talk about women's rights," Jamalzadah says, "we are talking about things that are important to men as well -- men who want to see Afghanistan move forward. If you sacrifice women to make peace, you are also sacrificing the men who support them and abandoning the country to the fundamentalists that caused all the problems in the first place."
Posted by:Beavis

#13  The Christian convert who fled to Florida is having to go back to court to keep from being deported since her parents brought her here and then abused her. Of course, 20,000,000 Mexicans have no court date.
Posted by: Jing de Medici8057   2010-08-03 18:19  

#12  And this is a religion that people want to support and join. WTF?
Posted by: miscellaneous   2010-08-03 16:57  

#11  men can only be highly civilized while other men, inevitably less civilized, are there to guard and feed them.

Orwell
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2010-08-03 16:54  

#10  The Landmarks Preservation Commission said in voting 9-0 that the 152-year-old building isn't distinctive enough to qualify as a landmark.

"This is not a building of special aesthetic character," said Commissioner Diana Chapin, echoing the remarks of her colleagues.


The dumba$$es on the commission ought to look at this cover of Time very closely and then maybe it will sink it to their dimwits what this mosque is about.
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-08-03 16:50  

#9  May not have won honor, but it certainly earned respect. "Let them hate, so long as they fear".
Posted by: Scooter McGruder   2010-08-03 16:40  

#8  Lone Ranger: er, no, that's not how we're supposed to behave. We're Americans, not Taliban. That sort of thing done in the Philippines a hundred years ago didn't earn us any honor, and it wouldn't do so today.
Posted by: Steve White   2010-08-03 14:36  

#7  The Taliban will be advocating a version of an Afghan state in line with their own conservative views

They are NOT conservative. I am conservative. The Taliban is reactionary; they are zealots.
Posted by: Steve White   2010-08-03 14:34  

#6  Maybe instead of training and arming men for the Afghan Army we should train and arm the women. They seem to have a better idea of what's at stake.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2010-08-03 12:59  

#5  Targeted killings of Taliban leaders by special ops. Ramp it up ten or twentyfold.
Posted by: lex   2010-08-03 10:18  

#4  All I can think of is: I want to hear of the Taliban commander, the husband, and the brother-in-laws all being held down on the floor, one at a time, by a couple of burly SEALs, while another SEAL cuts the nose and ears off each one with a rusty knife - and then uses a blowtorch to remove just one testicle from each one.

Where's "Black Jack" Pershing when you really need him?
Posted by: Lone Ranger   2010-08-03 10:10  

#3  That's the real issue for the rest of the world.

Indeed. 'Twas Pakistan's ISI that sent the Taliban to conquer Afghanistan the last time, and supported them while they hosted Al Qaeda. What odds Pakistan would not take advantage of the situation to send all their problem jihadi groups across the border, there to practice their techniques on the native Afghans instead of Pakistani citizens?
Posted by: trailing wife   2010-08-03 09:54  

#2  We are not going to be sending troops and spending money [there] forever.
Of course Afghanistan is likely to continue to foster jihad and slavishly adhere to militant Islam once we remove our troops & stop spending our money there. That's the real issue for the rest of the world.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2010-08-03 09:30  

#1  --- Ten years ago Aisha would have merely been killed out of hand. Mutilation sends a more persistent message.
--- They will have to de-mine Afghanistan before it's safe for anyone to walk around there. --- Perhaps training Afghan women in martial arts & arming them with handguns might do more immediate good. Of course the Taliban might simply take the weapons from them.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2010-08-03 09:28  

00:00