You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
White House appears ready to drop 'public option'
2009-08-17
Drudge has this white flag -- but we had it first!
Bowing to Republican pressure and an uneasy public, President Barack Obama's administration signaled Sunday it is ready to abandon the idea of giving Americans the option of government-run insurance as part of a new health care system.

Facing mounting opposition to the overhaul, administration officials left open the chance for a compromise with Republicans that would include health insurance cooperatives instead of a government-run plan. Such a concession probably would enrage Obama's liberal supporters but could deliver a much-needed victory on a top domestic priority opposed by GOP lawmakers.

Officials from both political parties reached across the aisle in an effort to find compromises on proposals they left behind when they returned to their districts for an August recess. Obama had wanted the government to run a health insurance organization to help cover the nation's almost 50 million uninsured, but didn't include it as one of his three core principles of reform.

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said that government alternative to private health insurance is "not the essential element" of the administration's health care overhaul. The White House would be open to co-ops, she said, a sign that Democrats want a compromise so they can declare a victory.

Under a proposal by Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., consumer-owned nonprofit cooperatives would sell insurance in competition with private industry, not unlike the way electric and agriculture co-ops operate, especially in rural states such as his own.

With $3 billion to $4 billion in initial support from the government, the co-ops would operate under a national structure with state affiliates, but independent of the government. They would be required to maintain the type of financial reserves that private companies are required to keep in case of unexpectedly high claims.

"I think there will be a competitor to private insurers," Sebelius said. "That's really the essential part, is you don't turn over the whole new marketplace to private insurance companies and trust them to do the right thing."
Posted by:Fred

#9  It's a trap!
Posted by: Admiral Ackbar   2009-08-17 18:42  

#8  The CO-OP alternative being proposed would have government funding, government regulations and government-subsidized management. It's a Trojan Horse designed to put the effective and overwhelming public opposition back to sleep. Don't fall for the ambush. No good solutions can come out of Washington except tort-reform and interstate portability and universal health care tax relief...
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2009-08-17 18:37  

#7  Mandatory 'minimums' on personal, auto, business liability, etc. are already being discussed and implemented in some states.

More payout to the lawyers.
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2009-08-17 11:32  

#6  I imagine they'll still come up with some sort of mandatory coverage that would be worse than a decent public option for a large part of the country. Like mandatory insurance purchases for small businesses.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2009-08-17 11:18  

#5  Agreed, P2K. "If it don't work, CHROME IT!"
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2009-08-17 08:51  

#4  Expect rebranding.
Soon....New Coke!
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-08-17 08:42  

#3  Yet tort Reform is the most important thing.
It's like lefties don't want more people to be able to afford their own healthcare!
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2009-08-17 07:56  

#2  First that "traitorous" op-ed by the Whole Foods guy, and now this! What will the poor little nutroots do?

(newc, tort reform ain't ever gonna happen. No way will they piss off one of their most reliable donor groups....)
Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie   2009-08-17 07:12  

#1  This is not a victory. Tort reform, reduction in state mandates and cross border competition would be.


A true reform in medicare would soldify us all.

Not hard to solve real problems.
Posted by: newc   2009-08-17 00:16  

00:00