| Submit your comments on this article |
| -Short Attention Span Theater- |
| New Cars in California Must Display Global Warming Score |
| 2008-07-07 |
| OAKLAND, Calif. -- California is making it mandatory for cars to be labeled with global warming scores, figures that take into account emissions from vehicle use and fuel production. And this helps our international competetiveness precisely how? The Green Gestapo--destroying personal liberty by virtue of myth. Sounds like a cult. The law requiring the labels goes into effect at the start of next year for all 2009 model cars, though its expected the labels will be popping up on cars in the coming months. So then buying a used car would be better for the environment because there is no environmental cost to produce it. It saves the raw materials and energy necessary to build a new one The labeling law forces cars for sale to display a global warming score, on a scale of one to 10, which is based on how vehicles in the same model year compare to one another. The higher the score, the cleaner a car is. The score takes into account emissions related to production of fuel for each vehicle as well as the direct emissions from vehicles. How about the emissions produced to make the car? The score will be displayed next to the already-required smog score, which also rates cars one to 10 for how many smog-forming emissions they emit. For both scores, an average vehicle will have a score of five. California is the first state of pass such as law, and a similar law will take effect in New York for 2010 model year vehicles. Global warming scores will be included on the state's DriveClean website. While this law is intended to help consumers take into account emissions while purchasing cars, a proposed law in the European Union would require E.U. public sector bodies put a price on emissions. That's coming next here. A law endorsed by the European Parliament's Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety would make governments put a monetary cost on the emissions of vehicles they plan to purchase, and add that to expense calculations. The law would exclude certain types of vehicles, such as ambulances and fire trucks. |
| Posted by:Deacon Blues |
| #3 The labeling law forces cars for sale to display a global warming score This will be funny as hell during the coming mini ice age. |
| Posted by: SteveS 2008-07-07 21:59 |
| #2 Our family has a 1972 Malibu with a built-up small bock, 850 cfm carb, Flow-Tech headers and 3" dual exhaust. We also have a 1985 1-Ton 'Dually' with a 512 Big Block, Hooker headers, double-twin 2-1/2" exhaust and 800 cfm carb. Both can do the 1/4 in around 12-13 seconds (or a bit under for the '72 - yes, it has a 'cage'). We can drive both on the streets legally. These would be 'negative score' vehicles. CO2 subsidies would do us rather well. (Yes, on a 'run' you can see the fuel gauge move) |
| Posted by: Mullah Richard 2008-07-07 20:43 |
| #1 Yep. Those cars that emit the most CO2 should be paid the most subsidy. After all they are feeding plants the most! This externality from farmers should be taxed for the benefit of the drivers of vehicles. |
| Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2008-07-07 19:36 |