You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
White House Near Decision to Close Gitmo
2007-06-22
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Bush administration is nearing a decision to close the Guantanamo Bay detainee facility and move its terror suspects to military prisons elsewhere, The Associated Press has learned. Senior administration officials said Thursday a consensus is building for a proposal to shut the center and transfer detainees to one or more Defense Department facilities, including the maximum-security military prison at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., where they could face trial.

President Bush's national security and legal advisers had been scheduled to discuss the move at a meeting Friday, the officials said, but after news of it broke, the White House said the meeting would not take place that day and no decision on Guantanamo Bay's status is imminent. ``It's no longer on the schedule for tomorrow,'' said Gordon Johndroe, a spokesman for the National Security Council. ``Senior officials have met on the issue in the past, and I expect they will meet on the issue in the future.''

Previous plans to close Guantanamo ran into resistance from Cheney, Gonzales and former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld. But officials said the new suggestion is gaining momentum with at least tacit support from the State and Homeland Security departments, the Pentagon and the Intelligence directorate. Cheney's office and the Justice Department have been against the step, arguing that moving ``unlawful'' enemy combatant suspects to the U.S. would give them undeserved legal rights.

In Congress, recently introduced legislation would require Guantanamo's closure. One measure would designate Fort Leavenworth, located about 30 miles northwest of Kansas City in northeast Kansas, as the new detention facility. Another bill would grant new rights to those held at Guantanamo Bay, including access to lawyers regardless of whether the prisoners are put on trial. Still another would allow detainees to protest their detentions in federal court, something they are now denied.
Dumb, dumb, dumb: the Constitution grants no rights to unlawful combatants captured on foreign soil. If we're to close Gitmo, fine, but ship these mooks to a prison camp at Bagram.
Military officials told Congress this month that the prison at Fort Leavenworth has 70 open beds and that the brig at a naval base in Charleston, S.C., has space for an additional 100 prisoners.
Posted by:Steve White

#25  I expect some serious legal kookiness to ensue once these folks are stateside. I would distribute them as widely as possible so that the kookiness is front and center on every local news channel. Here by SF I expect that there are probably judges who would release the hardest of these crazies directly onto the street. America needs to see our justice system for what it is. It is pretty disgusting to see a dog eat its own fecal material. This will be worse, but it may be instructive for those who refuse to pay attention.
Posted by: Super Hose   2007-06-22 23:43  

#24  Badanov, yea, I know. Actually, more like php... but essentially a logic construct using some perl/php syntax. The question is not whether it would throw exceptions, but whether it is understood. ;-)
Posted by: twobyfour   2007-06-22 22:18  

#23  How about "Gitmo Detainee Adoption Homes" program for bleeding heart libruls?
Posted by: zazz   2007-06-22 21:15  

#22  My brother's experience with those animals makes him of the opinion and I concur that every last one of those pigs held there should be shot first.
Then close it.


Well, all righty then. Let's "close" it!
Posted by: Zenster   2007-06-22 20:36  

#21  BTW Ship, my younger bro has moved on to "greener" pastures. There is always work for jarheads of his stripe.
Posted by: JerseyMike   2007-06-22 20:21  

#20  My brother's experience with those animals makes him of the opinion and I concur that every last one of those pigs held there should be shot first.
Then close it.
Posted by: JerseyMike   2007-06-22 20:16  

#19  Much simpler solution -

Give them back to the Afghans, and assign them to Dostum.

Out of sight, out of mind.
Posted by: buwaya   2007-06-22 17:21  

#18  McLean, VA is VERY nice. I'm sure Mr. Moran would LOVE to have some of the detainees in his district.
Posted by: eLarson   2007-06-22 12:58  

#17  BArge full of concrete, open water, large bomb. Problem solved...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2007-06-22 10:23  

#16  Fine idea. Put them in the US general prison population and have the guards go for a cigarette break.
Posted by: ed   2007-06-22 08:58  

#15  Oh, fine idea. Let's put them in the US prison system with full legal rights and let them proseletyze to their heart's content. Certainly the least we can do for them.
Posted by: KBK   2007-06-22 08:41  

#14  Close Gitmo, but relocate all detainees 150 nautical miles northeast.

I would prefer 2-3 miles straight up. Let Allan support their sorry asses.
Posted by: Large Omolutle9646   2007-06-22 08:40  

#13  Transfer the detainees to Martha's Vineyard.

Oooohhhhh... I like it. There's gotta be someplace else we can put them, too. Maybe someplace in San Francisco? Or maybe a nice building overlooking Central Park...
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2007-06-22 08:34  

#12  I say outsource the lot of 'em to Mexico.
Posted by: doc   2007-06-22 07:51  

#11  Transfer the detainees to Martha's Vineyard. I imagine there's a Coast Guard station they can stay at. A few tents on the adjacent beach should do it. If it gets too crowded I am certain Senator Kennedy would extend some hospitality.
Posted by: Glenmore   2007-06-22 07:19  

#10  twobyfour: In perl your code would throw at least three exceptions I can see.
Posted by: badanov   2007-06-22 07:16  

#9  It's the Guardian. I vote for wishful thinking.
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-06-22 06:05  

#8  Unfortunately, the President is thinking for the next administration, which he assumes will be Democrat. The Clinton loved his dhimmi up to Albania, on Kosovo.

Is Bush afraid of personal legal consequences if he doesn't close Gitmo? If so, that is taking the low road. Whatever is happening, the public is being excluded from the issue.
Posted by: McZoid   2007-06-22 04:57  

#7  Well, as I once said:

i = ;
if (!Gitmo){
take_no_prisoners = paw[i];}
Posted by: twobyfour   2007-06-22 04:41  

#6  Do not give in to this stupidity.
Posted by: newc   2007-06-22 04:32  

#5  Well, there is still Baffin Island. I heard it has winters quite lovely, no ROUSes, but friendly polar bears that love smoochin. Add savings on barbed wire.
Posted by: twobyfour   2007-06-22 04:16  

#4  Gitmo is vital to American military interests. In no way should these vermin be brought onto continental American soil. Such an act would inspire possible hostage taking and other terrorist attacks aimed at freeing their Islamic cohorts.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-06-22 02:19  

#3  This is an attempt by some to force the White House's hand on Gitmo. However, other reports say that the White House is NOT considering a closure : http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,285733,00.html.
Posted by: Shieldwolf   2007-06-22 01:21  

#2  Is JerseyMikes brother going to be out of work?
Posted by: Shipman   2007-06-22 01:14  

#1  Close Gitmo, but relocate all detainees 150 nautical miles northeast.
Posted by: Woozle Elmeter2970   2007-06-22 01:06  

00:00