You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Fox News Sunday, Interview With President Bill Clinton, 9/22/06 (Rough Transcript)
2006-09-24
extended transcript - quit digging when you're trying to excavate a sinking legacy
Posted by:Frank G

#7  LOL. The tiniest pinch and he squeals like a little gurl.
Posted by: Speater Flump2829   2006-09-24 16:48  

#6  And I won't even rant about what you and your minion (Halfbright) managed to do to us in North Korea.
Posted by: Darrell   2006-09-24 15:09  

#5  And while I'm at it, Monica's Boy, how many thousands of anti-Western terrorists were trained in Al Qaeda's camps while you were busy pushing national health care, gay rights in the military, Kyoto folly, and refinement of the definition of "sex"?
Posted by: Darrell   2006-09-24 15:08  

#4  "This country only has one person whoÂ’s worked on this terror. From the terrorist incidents under Reagan to the terrorist incidents from 9/11, only one: Richard Clarke."
I doubt Clarke worked alone, but I hold Clinton personally responsible that he kept Clarke in that position for eight years while terrorists blew up everything from the Black Hawks (1993) to the WTC (1993) to the Riyadh facility (1995) to the Khobar Towers (1996) to the African embassies (1998) to the USS Cole (2000) and his response was pathetic. Perhaps Clarke was working alone. He may as well have been. Clinton, you are as useless as Jimmy Carter, so don't start poking your bony finger at us, you dishonest scold.
Posted by: Darrell   2006-09-24 15:04  

#3  Just saw a snippet on FOX - they're having fun with the interview!

So President Clinton wanted to get bin Laden, but the CIA and FBI wouldn't 'certify" he was responsible?

Who set the bar that high, Mr. President? The Constitution? Congress? Or someone who didn't want to take any risks because he was worried about his "legacy"?

And now you blame those who couldn't meet your impossible standards for proof. How typical.
Posted by: Bobby   2006-09-24 13:01  

#2  the transcript won't show the purple faced rage™ (HT Drudge), the accusing tone and smarmy sneering. He's a petulant child
Posted by: Frank G   2006-09-24 12:09  

#1  But all the commenters at the end think WIlly did just grand - he's a towering intellect, and did much better than Bush would have.....
Posted by: Bobby   2006-09-24 11:16  

00:00