| Submit your comments on this article |
| Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
| Iran Rejects EU Threat Of U.N. Sanctions |
| 2005-09-05 |
| Note to EU-3, You are a bunch of piss ants Iran said Sunday that it won't stop uranium reprocessing work, rejecting a European threat that Tehran had less than two weeks to halt uranium conversion or face referral to the U.N. Security Council for possible sanctions. Iran resumed uranium reprocessing activities at its uranium conversion facility in Isfahan in central Iran last month. The facility converts uranium concentrate ore, known as yellowcake, into uranium hexafluoride gas, the feedstock for enrichment. In the next stage, Iran could feed the gas into centrifuges used to enrich uranium at its uranium enrichment plant in Natanz, also in central Iran. Iran says it won't restart uranium enrichment for now in Natanz, where it was suspended in 2003 under a deal with Europeans, but insists it will never again suspend uranium conversion in Isfahan. Uranium enriched to low level is used to produce nuclear fuel used to generate electricity, but further enrichment makes it suitable for use in nuclear weapons. The U.S. accuses Iran of using its civilian nuclear program as a cover to secretly produce nuclear weapons. Iran has rejected the charges saying its nuclear program is geared merely towards generating electricity, not creating a bomb. Iran restarted work in Isfahan after it rejected a European package of proposals that had called on Iran to permanently stop its uranium enrichment program in return for a supply of nuclear fuel and economic incentives. Tehran said the proposals were against the spirit of NPT and against previous agreements between Iran and the Europeans, which had recognized Iran's right to use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. Iran says it won't give up uranium enrichment, a right granted to it under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. A report by Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said on Friday that Tehran had recently produced about seven tons of the gas it needs to enrich uranium – a possible pathway to a nuclear weapon – after restarting work in Isfahan. Britain, Germany and France, negotiating on behalf of the 25-nation European Union, have said they may get involved in drafting the language of a resolution demanding that Iran be referred to the Security Council if Tehran fails to stop uranium conversion in Isfahan by the upcoming IAEA board meeting on Sept. 19. "The issue of Isfahan is a thing of the past," Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi told reporters Sunday. Mr. Asefi said Mr. ElBaradei's report does not justify Iran's referral to the Security Council and said the Europeans must stop threatening Iran. "The era of threats to force Iran to give up its rights is over. We have said it and say it again, that threat and resorting to two-sided language won't help Europe," he told a press conference. Meanwhile, an Iranian official noted that Mr. ElBaradei's report gave Iran credit for cooperating with the agency, but also included sections that would give Europeans the excuse to bring political pressures on Iran. "ElBaradei confirms that traces of highly enriched uranium, which had been used by America as a sign that Iran was moving towards nuclear weapons, were due to contaminated equipment imported into Iran. This is a big victory for Iran," Mohammad Saeedi, Deputy Head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, told state-run television Sunday. "But it has also used a language that gives Europeans the pretext to pressure Iran, which is not acceptable," he said. Mr. Saeedi said Iran won't answer some questions by Mr. ElBaradei simply because the demands he made are beyond his agency's responsibilities. "They have asked us to explain where we keep dual-use equipment we have imported and similar demands. These demands are beyond IAEA's responsibility," he said. |
| Posted by:Captain America |
| #8 First off I love this new Iranian gov they are just no PR at all they just thought Bush was a no PR cowboy now they got a real enemy that is just short of demanding EU surrender and subjication well maybe that would be a little drastic at the moment extortion payments like the old Muslim pirates used to get would be OK for now. This new Iranian leadership is great. http://iraqthemodel.blogspot.com/2005/09/reproducing-orwells-mill-in-iran.html hat tip to Iraq the Model got a great story on Iran's mullahs a*s backwards logic. by the way the option 3 I would like would be "decapitation and Disarmament" followed quickly by total air cover weapons to the Kurds in the North. The Iranian diplomatic forces will either see oportunity and join the Kurds and get weapons or be killed by the Iranian revolution guard left over. I think this would drive the diplomatic forces out of hiding into full warefare if by nothing but self preservation and survival. |
| Posted by: C-Low 2005-09-05 23:48 |
| #7 The MSM and Iran already said or denoted it > the EU3 per se are NOT and NEITHER Iran's only partners, nor are they the only nations Iran can negotiate with and use as defense ags the USA - read, Russia-China, and any anti-US mil intervention therefrom. IRAN AND NK CAN ADMIT TO AS MANY NUKES AS THEY WANT - THE ANTI-US AGENDISTS WILL STILL BLAME THE USA AND ONLY THE USA FOR NOT HAVING "PERFECT INTEL", OR DOING AHYTHING "PERFECTLY". |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2005-09-05 21:56 |
| #6 So, boys, whatcha gonna do now? They're gonna consider a strongly worded letter threatening the possibility of debating sanctions! |
| Posted by: Robert Crawford 2005-09-05 20:42 |
| #5 Betcha the Euros change it to four weeks... |
| Posted by: Darrell 2005-09-05 20:27 |
| #4 Iran said Sunday that it won't stop uranium reprocessing work, rejecting a European threat that Tehran had less than two weeks to halt uranium conversion or face referral to the U.N. Security Council for possible sanctions. So, boys, whatcha gonna do now? |
| Posted by: Bomb-a-rama 2005-09-05 20:24 |
| #3 As an example: they give Tehran two weeks, when it takes a few hours to shut the production line down. |
| Posted by: Ptah 2005-09-05 08:12 |
| #2 These guys aren't dumb: they can spot a toothless tiger as easily as we do. |
| Posted by: Ptah 2005-09-05 08:11 |
| #1 Time to let our little pit bull off the leash; have him bring back an ear! |
| Posted by: smn 2005-09-05 04:37 |