You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa: North
Egypt's Top Cleric Rails Against Terrorism
2005-07-30
Egypt's top Islamic cleric delivered a fierce sermon against terrorism Friday at the main mosque in Sharm el-Sheik, the Red Sea resort struck in deadly bombings a week ago.
"Kill all the terrorists, Brethren and Sistern! Chop their heads off! Blow up their cars! Kill their families!... No... Wait... Ummm..."
Even the Lebanese guerrilla group Hezbollah, branded as terrorist by Washington, says Muslim clerics have to act to curb extremism.
"We ain't extreme, of course. But those other guys are..."
After the unflagging bloodshed in Iraq and this month's London bombings, the Sharm attack has deepened what has been a growing debate in the Muslim world over how Islam should deal with terrorists who act in its name.
This? It barely even qualifies as a discussion. "Debates" in the Muslim world come with body counts...
Mohammed Sayyed Tantawi, grand imam of Al-Azhar — one of the Sunni world's most prestigious institutions — delivered the sermon at Friday prayers in Sharm el-Sheik's "Peace Mosque," packed with hundreds of worshippers still reeling from the July 23 bombings, which killed scores of Egyptians and foreign tourists. Tantawi told worshippers that "even polytheists who come to Egypt to see its civilization, who didn't come to harm you, you have to protect them and treat them in a good way." The cleric used the Arabic word "mushrikin" — "polytheists" — a term heavy with negative connotations in Islam. The Quran, Islam's holy book, repeatedly denounces "mushrikin," while accepting Jews and Christians as fellow monotheists. Islamic radicals often rail against polytheism and its followers.
And toss Christians and Jews and Shiites and Qadianis and atheists and agnostics and that guy down the street with the wrong color turban into the definition...
Those who killed dozens of innocents, "have no justification," and if they claim they are obeying orders of Islam, "then they are liars, liars and charlatans, and Islam disavows them," he said. "The aggressors who blow up themselves, their cars and bombs against innocent men, women and children will not be given any mercy by God ... they will be cursed by God and his angels," Tantawi said.
Even when they do it in Israel? And Kashmir? And Chechnya? Or only in Egypt?
Tantawi has emerged as a strong voice against terrorism in recent months. In early July, he harshly condemned Islamic insurgents in Iraq — who even some moderate Muslims feel are fighting for a just cause against U.S. occupation — saying all Iraqis and Arabs should unite to purge Iraq of "their filth and viciousness."
Hokay. We have the words. Any deeds to back them up?
Egyptian investigators have been focusing on the likelihood that homegrown Islamic militant cells in Sinai — possibly with international links — carried out the Sharm bombings, in which two car bombs and a knapsack bomb ripped through a luxury hotel, a neighborhood full of Egyptians and the entrance to a beach promenade. The official death toll stands at 64, but hospitals say bodies still uncounted could bring it to 88. With every terror attack, Arabs and Muslims have been struggling to strike a balance between condemning bloodshed and pointing to U.S. policies in Iraq and Israel they say fuel Islamic militant violence.
The argument, never very strong to start with, gets weaker every time it's used, doesn't it? By now it's kind of like an Islamic mantra. That and a $12 amulet is guaranteed to ward off the hairy eyeball...
Debate has focused on whether reform is needed to purge extremist teachings. In Lebanon, the militant Shiite Muslim Hezbollah said immediately after the Sharm attack that "mass murder attacks against innocent people ... require a decisive stance by (Muslim) clerics" against violence.
"Unless they're one of our heroic operations, of course..."
The group's stance on violence is becoming more nuanced.
"Nuance"=spit||go blind dichotomy...
It sharply opposes the U.S. troop presence in Iraq — but with its Iraqi Shiite brethren frequently falling victim in bombings, it has grown more vocal in condemning the insurgency in Iraq. Lebanon's most senior Shiite cleric, Grand Ayatollah Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah — who had past connections with Hezbollah, but broke with the group — said after the Sharm attacks that all Muslims must condemn such attacks, which he blamed on "backward minds that do not understand Islamic texts." But in his sermon Friday, he said the "evil phenomenon" of terrorism "stems from the policy of arrogance (by the United States and Israel)."
But he is well protected from the old mal'occhia...
At a small mosque in Cairo's Heliopolis suburb, the Friday preacher appealed to his congregation, trying to explain the proper meaning of "jihad" — a word often translated as "holy war" but more broadly meant as a "struggle" for Islam against oppression. Jihad, he said, is by word, not by action. "Oppression should be fought, but every thing has rules," he said in a sermon blared by loudspeaker across the neighborhood. "The world has become a small village, and with good words, we can influence and impress the rest of the world, not by horrific actions."
Posted by:Fred

#4  I don't see the contradiction here. He's opposed to terrorism, the killing of innocents.

But Joooooooos are all guilty by definition, so it's not "terrorism" to blow them up. And the Allies are occupiers, so that's not "terrorism" either. And the Iraqis? Um, they're the wrong kind of muslim or apostate or something. So, it's not terrorism to kill them, either.

See? No conflict.
Posted by: Jackal   2005-07-30 23:20  

#3  Nice teeth - is he British?
Posted by: Raj   2005-07-30 12:33  

#2  The problem with those who speak for Islam is that most of them are (clinically certifiable) sociopaths. This fact is nowhere clearer than when they are scared into "condemning" terrorism.
Posted by: gromgoru   2005-07-30 09:23  

#1  Saw this story in alG - it's an AP piece making the rounds in the symp press...

I'd like to see a simple valid translation in its entirety - sans the cherry-picking and spin. This sounds really good, but I don't buy it in this form.

It flies in the face of the last 4 years of real-life actions by alQ types the world over in general, and almost 60 years of hatred and murderous acts specifically against Israel.

It only came after Egypt was hit.

It's probably very skimpy on the goodies, such as naming names, recognizing peace is inherent in democratic institutions - not the Islamic ideology, that Islam is the home, safe harbor, facilitator, and financier of terrorism, including the Jews as deserving peace the same as everyone else, etc. etc. etc.

They have to do more than talk, they have to back it all up with consistent actions. I hold them to no higher standard than I do myself or my friends.
Posted by: .com   2005-07-30 03:05  

00:00