You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa: Horn
Sudanese airstrike in Darfur killed 100
2005-01-30
An airstrike by the Sudanese Air Force on villagers in southern Darfur killed or wounded nearly 100 people in a serious violation of a fragile cease-fire in the conflict-torn region, the United Nations said yesterday. The bombardment Wednesday of villages outside Shangil Tobaya sent thousands of people fleeing, UN spokeswoman Radhia Achouri said by telephone from Khartoum, Sudan's capital. UN Secretary General Kofi Annan was "deeply disturbed" by the bombing, UN spokesman Fred Eckhard said in New York.
"Deeply, deeply disturbed."
"This is the latest in a series of grave cease-fire violations that have resulted in a large number of civilian casualties, the displacement of thousands of people, and severe access restrictions for relief workers," Eckhard said in a statement. Achouri said African Union observers at the scene had reported "almost 100 casualties" but did not specify how many were dead and how many wounded. "But 100 casualties is 100 too many, be they wounded or dead," she said. "It is definitely one of the most serious violations of the cease-fire" signed by the government and the Darfur rebels last year.
"We're hoping the next violation doesn't have quite that many."
The United Nations' deputy chief envoy to Sudan, Taye-Brook Zerihoun, spoke to the Sudanese Foreign Ministry about the bombardment, but had not received a reply, Achouri said. Sudan's government had issued no statement about the incident by last night. The chief spokesman of the Foreign Ministry did not answer his cellphone yesterday, the Islamic sabbath.
"We gots nuttin' to say. Piss off."
Aid workers based in Shangil Tobaya, 40 miles south of El Fasher, said they saw bombs exploding on the ground Wednesday afternoon and an air force Antonov, a Soviet-built aircraft, circling overhead. Later Wednesday, the African Union, which has 1,400 cease-fire monitors and protection troops in Darfur, confirmed the aerial bombardment, calling it a "major violation" of the cease-fire. "The government of Sudan always says aerial bombardments are not government policy and that President Omar el-Bashir has issued firm instructions that there should be no use of Antonovs for aerial bombardment," Achouri said.
Couldn't have been them, then, right?
The Sudanese government often has been accused of employing its air force against civilians in Darfur, and it has usually denied the allegations. It is rare that the African Union confirms an aerial bombardment. Achouri also said that rebels were believed to be responsible for the destruction of Hamada village in southern Darfur last week. Earlier this week, the United Nations announced the attack on Hamada, singling it out as the worst case of the escalated fighting in Darfur. More than 100 people, mainly women and children, were feared killed. Hamada and Shangil Tobaya lie in the northeast part of South Darfur. Fighting has displaced more than 10,000 people there in the past two weeks, the UN said.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#9  No, any member of SC can [call a special session].

Yes, but Russia is doing its hair, and France has a hot date...
Posted by: Pappy   2005-01-30 9:35:16 PM  

#8  Sudanese airstrike in Darfur killed 100

This crap ain't gonna end until there's a nice little airstrike while Khartoum's in full session. Genocide needs to be met with annihilation for those who perpetrate it.
Posted by: Zenster   2005-01-30 2:08:22 PM  

#7  JFM, no, no, no, of course not, but they promise to talk about it sometime ... really they do ... cross their hearts ... mutter, mutter ... natter, natter ...
Posted by: Steve White   2005-01-30 12:52:55 PM  

#6  Anyone heard of leftists staging a demo in front of the Sudan embassy? Asking for sanctions? Burning the Soudanese flag? Putting themselves in front of Soudanese bulldozers?
Posted by: JFM   2005-01-30 12:25:22 PM  

#5  Oh!
Posted by: Shipman   2005-01-30 9:52:10 AM  

#4  No, any member of SC can.
Posted by: Steve   2005-01-30 9:50:26 AM  

#3  Is the US the only member that can call a special session? If so that's way too much power in one seat.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-01-30 9:25:35 AM  

#2  We'll see if the USA asks for such a meeting.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester   2005-01-30 8:44:30 AM  

#1  I expect an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council, tonight.
Posted by: gromgorru   2005-01-30 8:28:58 AM  

00:00